Re: [lisp] Fwd: Re: Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis-20: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

(A) Desirable, because LISP-SEC provides improved security for the protocol, and depending on the deployment scenario and its threat model, one should have the option of using it, so MtI would be a welcome improvement. I am an author of LISP-SEC. Best, Vina On 9/28/18, 3:38 PM, "lisp on

Re: [lisp] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lisp-vendor-lcaf

I believe the document is ready for handing to the AD. I am an author on this document. Best, Vina From: lisp mailto:lisp-boun...@ietf.org>> on behalf of Luigi Iannone mailto:g...@gigix.net>> Date: Friday, July 6, 2018 at 3:06 AM To: "lisp@ietf.org list"

Re: [lisp] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis-12

I have reviewed the document and support handing it to the AD. Best, Vina From: lisp > on behalf of Luigi Iannone > Date: Thursday, April 5, 2018 at 7:17 AM To: "lisp@ietf.org list"

Re: [lisp] The LISP WG has placed draft-rodrigueznatal-lisp-pubsub in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"

As an author, I support adoption of this document. The need for a publish subscribe mechanism has arisen in many past and current LISP use cases and deployments. I believe it is in the interest of the WG to provide such a pub/sub extension. Vina > On Apr 3, 2018, at 7:22 PM, Victor Moreno

Re: [lisp] RFC6830bis and multiprotocol support

+1 on proposed extension. This would enable LISP to carry L2 payload and NSH as well, which are all implemented in FD.io (VPP) and and interoperable with ODL Mapping Server. Best, Vina From: lisp > on behalf of Dino Farinacci

Re: [lisp] Call for WG Adoption of Vendor Specific LCAF [draft-rodrigueznatal-lisp-vendor-lcaf-00.txt]

Hi All, I support adoption of this draft as a WG document. Best, Vina From: lisp > on behalf of Luigi Iannone > Date: Wednesday, July 26, 2017 at 2:41 AM To: LISP mailing list list

Re: [lisp] WG Last Call fo document draft-ietf-lisp-signal-free-multicast-02.txt

Support. Vina From: lisp > on behalf of Luigi Iannone > Date: Monday, March 27, 2017 at 9:06 AM To: LISP mailing list list > Cc:

Re: [lisp] Call for WG Adoption of document draft-farinacci-lisp-te-12.txt

Support. Vina From: lisp > on behalf of Florin Coras > Date: Thursday, April 13, 2017 at 9:49 AM To: Luigi Iannone > Cc:

Re: [lisp] Call for WG Adoption of document draft-meyer-lisp-mn-16.txt

Support. Vina From: lisp > on behalf of Florin Coras > Date: Thursday, April 13, 2017 at 9:49 AM To: Luigi Iannone > Cc:

[lisp] Changing the title of draft-ietf-lisp-yang

Hello, During IETF96 WG meeting a change of title from "LISP Configuration YANG Model" to "YANG Model for LISP" was proposed by authors for draft-ietf-lisp-yang such that the tile reflects operational models being included. This is to request comment form the list on this change. Thanks,

Re: [lisp] Call for adoption of draft-boucadair-lisp-type-iana-01

I support creating a registry for the LISP messages. + 1 on reserving at least one entry for experimentation. Regards, Vina From: lisp > on behalf of Luigi Iannone > Date: Friday, July 15, 2016 at 4:56 AM

Re: [lisp] YANG in draft-ietf-lisp-yang-02: compilation errors

Thanks Benoit. I¹ll submit an update soon. Best, Vina On 6/20/16, 4:47 AM, "Benoit Claise (bclaise)" wrote: >Dear draft-ietf-lisp-yang authors, > >You posted a new version of draft-ietf-lisp-yang. >Note that, while the previous version compiled fine from YANG point, >this

Re: [lisp] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lisp-ddt-05.txt

This seems fine to me, including the changes suggested by Joel. We¹ll change the text in DDT to 32 bits for IID and referencing LCAF for more details, in the next revision. Best, Vina On 5/2/16, 10:10 AM, "lisp on behalf of Dino Farinacci"

Re: [lisp] Instance-IDs in draft-ietf-lisp-lcaf-12

On 4/18/16, 10:12 AM, "lisp on behalf of Dino Farinacci" wrote: >> While reviewing draft-ietf-lisp-lcaf-12 I realized that if we want >>instance-id support for other LCAF types then we must support recursive >>LCAFs, i.e., use Type 2 and

Re: [lisp] Update Proposed CHarter

Thanks Luigi, this version looks great. Best, Vina On 1/6/16 6:42 AM, "Luigi Iannone" wrote: >Hi All, > >Hereafter a new version of the charter with the comments received so far. > >Please send more feedback. Would be good if we can send the charter to >our AD by next week. >

Re: [lisp] Update Proposed CHarter

Hello Chairs, Thanks for the text. One minor comment: in addition to Fabio's suggestion, perhaps we can also include a wording that explicitly includes control plane protocol extensions needed to accommodate the new mapping functions. I have captures both additions in << >> below. - Alternative

Re: [lisp] YANG data models in LISP: extraction and compilation feedback

Hi Beniot, Thanks for the notification. The errors below should be fixed in the new revision draft-ietf-lisp-yang-01 published today. I also tested the new version with yangvalidator, and all seems to be fine. Thank you, Vina From: "Benoit Claise (bclaise)"

Re: [lisp] LISP Overlay Model

Yes to extending the overlay model to support multiple data plane encap types. Vina On 8/9/15 3:05 PM, Luigi Iannone g...@gigix.net wrote: Hi, LISP provides a rather complete and powerful control-plane, where by means of LCAF, possibly any existing namespace can be mapped on each other.

[lisp] FW: New Version Notification for draft-ermagan-lisp-yang-01.txt

Dear WG, Please find below a new version of the LISP YANG model draft. The main changes in this revision include removing the feature/if-feature references for various LISP device types, and breaking the model into smaller modules for each LISP role. Looking forward to comments from the WG on