Yes to extending the overlay model to support multiple data plane encap types.
Vina On 8/9/15 3:05 PM, "Luigi Iannone" <[email protected]> wrote: >Hi, > >LISP provides a rather complete and powerful control-plane, where >by means of LCAF, possibly any existing namespace can be mapped >on each other. >However, the data-plane is not as flexible. The current specifications >allow only IPv4 over IPv6 and vice versa. > >In order to create what Sharon Barakai defined ³map assisted overlays² >more work is needed. > >In this context the WG should also decide whether just an >extended/enhanced >data-plane is sufficient/needed. Or should the scope be slightly larger >and >allow as well to support multiple headers type? >Such header are not necessarily defined by the LISP WG >(e.g. VXLAN-GPE, GENEVE, GUE, etc.) > >Would the WG be interested in working in extending the LISP overlay model >in order to provide data-plane support for what the control plane already >allows? >And what should be the scope? > >Joel & Luigi > > >_______________________________________________ >lisp mailing list >[email protected] >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
