Re: [lisp] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lisp-vendor-lcaf

HI All, the WG LC for this document is now closed. We received several email in support of the document, confirming the consensus reach in London. As usual the shepherd writeup will follow and the document will then be handed over to our AD. Ciao L. > On 6 Jul 2018, at 06:06, Luigi

Re: [lisp] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lisp-vendor-lcaf

nt to the AD > > > > *From: *lisp on behalf of > Luigi Iannone > *Date: *Friday, July 6, 2018 at 3:06 AM > *To: *"lisp@ietf.org list" > > *Cc: *"lisp-cha...@ietf.org" > > *Subject: *[lisp] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lisp

Re: [lisp] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lisp-vendor-lcaf

quot; *Cc: *"lisp-cha...@ietf.org" *Subject: *[lisp] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lisp-vendor-lcaf Folks, As Alberto mentioned in a previous mail, in London there was consensus to move forward draft-ietf-lisp-vendor-lcaf [https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-lisp-vendor-lcaf-02] (

Re: [lisp] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lisp-vendor-lcaf

+1 On 19/7/18 23:35, Marc Portoles Comeras (mportole) wrote: I also support handing this document to the AD *From: *lisp on behalf of Luigi Iannone *Date: *Friday, July 6, 2018 at 3:06 AM *To: *"lisp@ietf.org list" *Cc: *"lisp-cha...@ietf.org" *Subject: *[lisp] WG

Re: [lisp] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lisp-vendor-lcaf

I also support handing this document to the AD From: lisp on behalf of Luigi Iannone Date: Friday, July 6, 2018 at 3:06 AM To: "lisp@ietf.org list" Cc: "lisp-cha...@ietf.org" Subject: [lisp] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lisp-vendor-lcaf Folks, As Alberto mentione

Re: [lisp] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lisp-vendor-lcaf

I support handing this document to the AD. Florin > On Jul 6, 2018, at 3:06 AM, Luigi Iannone wrote: > > Folks, > > As Alberto mentioned in a previous mail, in London there was consensus to > move forward draft-ietf-lisp-vendor-lcaf >

Re: [lisp] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lisp-vendor-lcaf

I agree that this document is ready to be handed to the AD. From: lisp on behalf of Luigi Iannone Date: Friday, July 6, 2018 at 6:09 AM To: "lisp@ietf.org list" Cc: "lisp-cha...@ietf.org" Subject: [lisp] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lisp-vendor-lcaf Folks, As Alberto men

Re: [lisp] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lisp-vendor-lcaf

I support handing this document to the AD. -Johnson > On Jul 6, 2018, at 3:06 AM, Luigi Iannone wrote: > > Folks, > > As Alberto mentioned in a previous mail, in London there was consensus to > move forward draft-ietf-lisp-vendor-lcaf >

Re: [lisp] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lisp-vendor-lcaf

I support handing this document to the AD. It's pretty straightforward, and I'm aware of implementations that plan to take advantage of this feature. Fabio On 7/6/18 6:06 AM, Luigi Iannone wrote: Folks, As Alberto mentioned in a previous mail, in London there was consensus to move forward

Re: [lisp] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lisp-vendor-lcaf

> list" mailto:lisp@ietf.org>> Cc: "lisp-cha...@ietf.org<mailto:lisp-cha...@ietf.org>" mailto:lisp-cha...@ietf.org>> Subject: [lisp] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lisp-vendor-lcaf Folks, As Alberto mentioned in a previous mail, in London there was consen

Re: [lisp] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lisp-vendor-lcaf

On Jul 6, 2018, at 12:06 PM, Luigi Iannone mailto:g...@gigix.net>> wrote: Folks, As Alberto mentioned in a previous mail, in London there was consensus to move forward draft-ietf-lisp-vendor-lcaf [https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-lisp-vendor-lcaf-02] (after the few fixes that I asked).

Re: [lisp] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lisp-vendor-lcaf

As an author, I believe this document is ready for the review of the AD. Thanks, Alberto On Fri, Jul 6, 2018 at 3:06 AM Luigi Iannone wrote: > Folks, > > As Alberto mentioned in a previous mail, in London there was consensus to > move forward draft-ietf-lisp-vendor-lcaf [ >

Re: [lisp] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lisp-vendor-lcaf

I agree that it is ready for handing to the AD. Dino > On Jul 6, 2018, at 3:06 AM, Luigi Iannone wrote: > > Folks, > > As Alberto mentioned in a previous mail, in London there was consensus to > move forward draft-ietf-lisp-vendor-lcaf >

[lisp] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lisp-vendor-lcaf

Folks, As Alberto mentioned in a previous mail, in London there was consensus to move forward draft-ietf-lisp-vendor-lcaf [https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-lisp-vendor-lcaf-02 ] (after the few fixes that I asked). Fixes are