[lisp] Announcing the first public release of LISPmob

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 The LISPmob development team is pleased to announce the first public release of LISPmob for Linux. LISPmob was developed by Cisco Systems and it is now being released under the GPLv2, hosted and maintained at the Technical University of Catalonia

Re: [lisp] Can not reach IPv6 site via LISP network

on the ipv6-test.com web site? I certainly cannot telnet to port 80 of www.ipv6-db.com. Regards, -Lori Thank you Markus - Original Message - From: Lori Jakab lja...@ac.upc.edu To: Markus Moeller mar...@moeller.plus.com Cc: lisp@ietf.org; lisp-supp...@cisco.com Sent: Sunday, December 11

Re: [lisp] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lisp-deployment-04.txt

This version contains mainly editorial changes, improving clarity. Also, all references have been made informational, since this is an informational draft. -Lori On 09/12/12 22:19, internet-dra...@ietf.org wrote: A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.

Re: [lisp] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lisp-deployment-05.txt

This revision only updates the references, as previsously discussed here. Regards, -Lori Jakab On 10/20/12 21:45, internet-dra...@ietf.org wrote: A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol

Re: [lisp] draft-ietf-lisp-deployment review

Hi Joel, Thank you for reviewing. See inline for answers. On Dec 13, 2012, at 4:02 AM, Joel M. Halpern wrote: In conjunction with the WG last call on this document, I performed my own review. It appears that the text in section 3.1 on Map Server deployment asserts that (for EIDs

Re: [lisp] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lisp-deployment

Hi Damien, Many thanks for the review. See responses inline: On 01/15/13 00:15, Damien Saucez wrote: Hello, Comments inline [...] LISP site: A single host or a set of network elements in an edge network under the administrative control of a single organization, delimited

Re: [lisp] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lisp-deployment

On 01/21/13 19:06, Damien Saucez wrote: comments inline On 21 Jan 2013, at 10:42, Lori Jakab lja...@ac.upc.edu wrote: Hi Damien, Many thanks for the review. See responses inline: On 01/15/13 00:15, Damien Saucez wrote: Hello, Comments inline [...] LISP site: A single host

Re: [lisp] Should we use Locator-Status-Bits in Internet deployment?

On 01/22/13 12:22, Damien Saucez wrote: On 22 Jan 2013, at 10:15, Luigi Iannone g...@gigix.net mailto:g...@gigix.net wrote: Hi All, the definition of LSB as of the to-be-soon-rfc lisp specification is: LISP Locator Status Bits (LSBs): When the L-bit is also set, the locator status

Re: [lisp] comments on 'draft-ietf-lisp-deployment-06'

Sender: lisp-boun...@ietf.org On-Behalf-Of: lja...@ac.upc.edu Subject: Re: [lisp] comments on 'draft-ietf-lisp-deployment-06' Message-Id: 512e3492.9010...@ac.upc.edu Recipient: buxt...@cintas.com ---BeginMessage--- Hi Fred, Thank you very much for the feedback. See responses in-line below: On

Re: [lisp] Shepherd writeup for draft-ietf-lisp-deployment-07

Hi Wassim, On 04/27/2013 08:34 AM, Wassim Haddad wrote: Dear all, I am the document shepherd for draft-ietf-lisp-deployment-07. In order for me to complete the shepherd writeup, I would like first to ask the authors and the WG if any and all appropriate IPR disclosures required for full

Re: [lisp] AD Evaluation: draft-ietf-lisp-deployment

On 05/28/2013 11:38 PM, Templin, Fred L wrote: -Original Message- From: Paul Vinciguerra [mailto:pvi...@vinciconsulting.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2013 12:58 PM To: Templin, Fred L; Lori Jakab; Brian Haberman Cc: draft-ietf-lisp-deploym...@tools.ietf.org; lisp@ietf.org Subject: RE

Re: [lisp] AD Evaluation: draft-ietf-lisp-deployment

Hi Fred, On 05/29/2013 08:32 PM, Templin, Fred L wrote: Hi Lori, -Original Message- From: Lori Jakab [mailto:lja...@ac.upc.edu] Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2013 9:58 AM To: Templin, Fred L Cc: Paul Vinciguerra; Lori Jakab; Brian Haberman; draft-ietf-lisp- deploym...@tools.ietf.org

Re: [lisp] Android feature request for LISP

Hi Rene, While not integrated deep into the Android operating system, there is an open source project implementing LISP for Android:http://lispmob.org/ Not sure if you're already familiar with it, but you may want to take a look. HTH, -Lori On Nov 7, 2013, at 4:56 PM, Rene Bartsch

Re: [lisp] LISP SDN

Hi Alberto, Robert, I'm really excited to LISP used as an SDN enabler!! A few initial comments: On 02/18/2014 12:15 PM, Alberto Rodriguez-Natal wrote: Hi Robert, On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 4:14 AM, Robert Raszuk rob...@raszuk.net mailto:rob...@raszuk.net wrote: [...] But I must ask

Re: [lisp] LISP SDN

On 02/18/2014 01:17 PM, Alberto Rodriguez-Natal wrote: Hi Lori, Thanks for the comments, see below. On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 7:57 PM, Lori Jakab l...@lispmob.org mailto:l...@lispmob.org wrote: [...] Besides, please note that we may won't cover the same types that OF covers. We

Re: [lisp] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lisp-threats/

I think this draft is complete and ready to go to the IESG. -Lori On 03/20/2014 08:23 PM, Joel M. Halpern wrote: The draft LISP Threats Analysis has been significantly revised following the WG last call in November. The working group seems happy with the results of the revision. This email

Re: [lisp] Proposing Encapsulation Format LCAF type

On Nov 27, 2014, at 5:34 PM, Luigi Iannone g...@gigix.net wrote: Hi All, I would like to encourage the WG to post their thoughts about Dino’s proposal of a new LCAF type for Encapsulation Format. Also, a couple of corrections/Additions to Dino’s mail. About point (1) of Dino’s mail:

Re: [lisp] [EXTENDED] draft-saucez-lisp-impact-07 - Call for WG Adoption

Hi, I support option #1. -Lori On 12/22/2014 05:12 PM, Joel M. Halpern wrote: To amplify Luigi's comment, we have several choices: 1) We can use this document as the basis for the working group action to address the milestone. 2) We can use something else as a basis for working group action

Re: [lisp] draft-ietf-lisp-ddt-02

On 01/24/2015 12:39 AM, Fabio Maino wrote: Agree. It was recently refreshed from expiration, and I believe it's ready for last call. +1 There are several implementations, that have been thoroughly tested for interoperability, so I support this document going into working group last call.

Re: [lisp] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lisp-ddt-02.txt

Hi, I read the draft and I think it is ready to be handed to the AD. Regards, -Lori On 01/29/2015 05:36 PM, Luigi Iannone wrote: Hi All, The authors of draft-ietf-lisp-ddt-02 [http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-lisp-ddt-02], as well as several active WG participants, requested the WG

Re: [lisp] draft-ermagan-lisp-yang-01.txt - Call for WG Adoption

On 8/10/15 12:57 AM, Luigi Iannone wrote: Hi All, The authors of the document draft-ermagan-lisp-yang-01.txt [https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ermagan-lisp-yang-01] asked for WG adoption. I support WG adoption of this document. -Lori This message begins the two weeks call for WG

Re: [lisp] LISP Overlay Model

On 8/10/15 1:05 AM, Luigi Iannone wrote: Hi, LISP provides a rather complete and powerful control-plane, where by means of LCAF, possibly any existing namespace can be mapped on each other. However, the data-plane is not as flexible. The current specifications allow only IPv4 over IPv6

Re: [lisp] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lisp-lcaf-12

On 4/8/16 4:27 PM, Luigi Iannone wrote: > Hi All, > > During our meeting yesterday, the authors of the LISP LCAF document > [https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-lisp-lcaf-12] > asked for Last Call. The room showed consensus and no objections were > raised. > > This email starts the usual two

Re: [lisp] Changing the title of draft-ietf-lisp-yang

On 7/25/16 7:41 AM, Damien Saucez wrote: > This new title is perfect. +1 -Lori > > Damien Saucez >> On 25 Jul 2016, at 14:12, Vina Ermagan (vermagan) wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> During IETF96 WG meeting a change of title from “LISP Configuration YANG >> Model” to “YANG

Re: [lisp] Call for adoption of draft-boucadair-lisp-type-iana-01

On 7/15/16 6:56 AM, Luigi Iannone wrote: > His All, > > the chairs have review the WG discussion during the adoption call. > > We are concerned by the low level of support. > We also observed significant discussion around the experimental > allocation. > So we are re-issuing and clarifying

Re: [lisp] Call for adoption draft-farinacci-lisp-rfc6833bis

I support this document becoming a WG item. -Lori On 11/16/16 4:58 AM, Luigi Iannone wrote: > Folks, > > The chairs received a request for the following document to be > adopted as a WG item: > > _https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-farinacci-lisp-rfc6833bis/_ > > Here starts a 14 day call

Re: [lisp] Call for adoption draft-farinacci-lisp-rfc6830bis

I support this document becoming a WG item. -Lori On 11/16/16 4:57 AM, Luigi Iannone wrote: > Folks, > > The chairs received a request for the following document to be > adopted as a WG item: > > _https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-farinacci-lisp-rfc6830bis/_ > > Here starts a 14 day call

Re: [lisp] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lisp-sec-12.txt

On 12/2/16 6:50 PM, Luigi Iannone wrote: > Hi All, > > feedback for this last call has been quite low. For this reason we > decide to extend the last call for another two weeks, ending December 16th. > > Please state your opinion on whether this document is ready for publication. Yes, please

Re: [lisp] Call for WG Adoption of document draft-portoles-lisp-eid-mobility-02.txt

Hi, On 4/12/17 12:28 PM, Luigi Iannone wrote: > Hi All, > > During the 98th IETF authors of the > document draft-portoles-lisp-eid-mobility-02.txt > [https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-portoles-lisp-eid-mobility-02] > asked for WG adoption. Meeting participants expressed consensus on adoption. >

Re: [lisp] WG Last Call fo document draft-ietf-lisp-signal-free-multicast-02.txt

Hi, I support draft-ietf-lisp-signal-free-multicast-02 to be handed to the AD. Regards, -Lori On 3/27/17 7:06 PM, Luigi Iannone wrote: > Folks, > > the chairs did not receive any feedback concerning this call. > > Remember that silence is not consensus. > > We extend the WG Last Call until

Re: [lisp] [ERRATA] Call for WG Adoption of Vendor Specific LCAF [draft-rodrigueznatal-lisp-vendor-lcaf-00.txt]

Support. -Lori On 7/26/17 2:16 PM, Luigi Iannone wrote: > The call ends August 10th 2017 ! > > Luigi > >> On 26 Jul 2017, at 11:41, Luigi Iannone > > wrote: >> >> Hi All, >> >> During the 99th IETF authors of the >> document

Re: [lisp] Call for WG Adoption of document draft-farinacci-lisp-predictive-rlocs-02.txt

Support On May 19, 2017 12:06:45 PM GMT+03:00, Luigi Iannone wrote: >Hi All, > >Authors of the document draft-farinacci-lisp-predictive-rlocs-02.txt >[https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-farinacci-lisp-predictive-rlocs/

Re: [lisp] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-iannone-6834bis-00.txt

Hi, I support this draft going to the AD. Best regards, -Lori On 5/20/18 8:17 PM, Joel Halpern wrote: > This starts a 4 week implicit adoption call and explicit last call for > the LISP Map Versioning draft revision with the purpose of moving this > work onto the standards track. > > Please

Re: [lisp] The LISP WG has placed draft-rodrigueznatal-lisp-pubsub in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"

Hi, I support adoption as a WG document. Regards, -Lori On 4/4/18 4:26 AM, Joel M. Halpern wrote: > This was discussed in London, and the authors have requested working > group adoption. > > Please comment on whether you think this document is ready for WG > adoption.  Which does not mean it is

Re: [lisp] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lisp-gpe-03

Hi, I have read the document, worked on implementation and inter-operability testing, and I think it is ready for handing to the AD. Regards, -Lori On 4/5/18 5:08 PM, Luigi Iannone wrote: > Hi All, > > During our last meeting, the authors of the LISP GPE document >  

Re: [lisp] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis-12

Hi, I think the document is ready to be handed to the AD. Best regards, -Lori On 04/05/2018 04:17 PM, Luigi Iannone wrote: > Hi All, > > During our last meeting it was apparent that the work on the LISP > document  [https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis-12 >

Re: [lisp] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6833bis-10

Hi, I think this document is ready to be handed to the AD. Best regards, -Lori On 04/05/2018 04:35 PM, Luigi Iannone wrote: > Hi All, > > During our last meeting it was apparent that the work on the LISP > document  [https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6833bis-10] > seems done and

Re: [lisp] Call fo adoption of draft-boucadair-lisp-rfc8113bis-01.txt

Hi, I read the draft, and support its adoption as a WG document. -Lori On 19/09/2018 17:04, Luigi Iannone wrote: Folks, here is another piece of the work done in our WG that needs to be moved to PS. It is the updated version of RFC 8113, nothing changed just updated coherently with the

Re: [lisp] Moving draft-ietf-lisp-name-encoding to standard track?

Support. -Lori On 1/22/24 11:55 PM, Marc Portoles Comeras (mportole) wrote: I also support moving this document to Standard track *From: *lisp on behalf of Victor Moreno *Date: *Friday, January 12, 2024 at 7:57 AM *To: *Jordi Paillissé *Cc: *lisp@ietf.org *Subject: *Re: [lisp] Moving

Re: [lisp] Support draft-nexagon wg adoption

I agree, I also support adopting this as a working group document. -Lori On 11/19/19 06:49, Dino Farinacci wrote: I think this use-case is a great one to make use of all the functionality LISP already supports. I support adoption as a working group draft with a goal to publish the draft as

Re: [lisp] I-D Action: draft-farinacci-lisp-name-encoding-10.txt

Hi, Just wanted to mention to the WG that support for decoding Distinguished Name Encoding in Wireshark was accepted into the master branch and will be part of the 3.4.x stable release series. https://gitlab.com/wireshark/wireshark/-/commit/dc4a5b5addcf990589f7a1afa6963d9de9a5f2b2

Re: [lisp] Request for WG document - draft-farinacci-lisp-name-encoding

On Sep 27, 2020, at 9:36 AM, Dino Farinacci wrote: > > I did not see any objections for this request but I didn’t see any specific > support either. Can we get some replies if you support this. Otherwise, it > will continue to reside for more than 4 years as an individual submission. I’m

Re: [lisp] Moving forward with lisp-nexagon

Hi Sharon, I think this draft addresses some really interesting use cases, so I would like to see it advanced. -Lori > On Aug 2, 2020, at 6:44 PM, Sharon Barkai > wrote: > > We have presented the nexagon > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-lisp-nexagon-04  >

Re: [lisp] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lisp-pubsub

Hi, I think the document is ready to be handed to the AD. Best regards, -Lori On 1/13/21 8:20 AM, Luigi Iannone wrote: Hi All, The authors of draft-ietf-lisp-pubsub submitted a new version addressing the issues raised during SECDIR review. The document seems mature and stable and authors are

Re: [lisp] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lisp-nexagon

Hi, I think the document is ready to be handed to the AD. Best regards, -Lori > On Feb 3, 2021, at 6:57 PM, Sharon Barkai > wrote: > > Thank you Luigi Joel. > > We are working to add LISP based digital-twin interface for road segments to > the AECC auto-edge. The roll of this interface is