Support.
-Lori
On 1/22/24 11:55 PM, Marc Portoles Comeras (mportole) wrote:
I also support moving this document to Standard track
*From: *lisp <[email protected]> on behalf of Victor Moreno
<[email protected]>
*Date: *Friday, January 12, 2024 at 7:57 AM
*To: *Jordi Paillissé <[email protected]>
*Cc: *[email protected] <[email protected]>
*Subject: *Re: [lisp] Moving draft-ietf-lisp-name-encoding to standard
track?
I support moving this document to the standards track.
Victor
On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 3:51 AM Jordi Paillissé
<[email protected]> wrote:
Support!
Jordi
El 11/1/24 a les 18:34, Fabio Maino (fmaino) ha escrit:
I support moving this document to standard track
Fabio
*From: *lisp <[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected]> on behalf of Luigi Iannone
<[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]>
*Date: *Thursday, January 11, 2024 at 4:53 AM
*To: *LISP mailing list list <[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected]>
*Cc: *[email protected] <[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected]>
*Subject: *[lisp] Moving draft-ietf-lisp-name-encoding to
standard track?
Hi All,
Happy new year!
As you may have seen from Alberto’s shepherd review of the
name encoding document, it is suggested to move the document
to standard track.
Jim Guichard (our AD) is OK as long as the WG is OK with this
change and that deployment experience is added to the document.
Hence, this email opens a two weeks call to check if you agree
with the change.
Please reply to this email stating whether you are in favor or
you are against.
(Silence does not count)
Please reply.
Ciao
L.
Begin forwarded message:
*From: *"Alberto Rodriguez-Natal \(natal\)"
<[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected]>
*Subject: [lisp] Shepherd's review of
draft-ietf-lisp-name-encoding*
*Date: *December 28, 2023 at 12:00:33 GMT+1
*To: *"[email protected]" <mailto:[email protected]>
<[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]>
Hi all,
The shepherd’s review of the LISP Distinguished Name
Encoding has been posted. The document is in good shape
and minor identified nits have been fixed. Please find the
review here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lisp-name-encoding/shepherdwriteup/
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lisp-name-encoding/shepherdwriteup/>
However, as part of the review, it was raised the question
if the document is in the right stream (currently in
Experimental). Given that there are known implementations
of the spec and that it has been running in production for
some time, my suggestion is to consider moving this
document to Standards track instead.
Thanks,
Alberto
_______________________________________________
lisp mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
<https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>
_______________________________________________
lisp mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
_______________________________________________
lisp mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
_______________________________________________
lisp mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
