Re: [lisp] Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on draft-ietf-lisp-lcaf-17: (with COMMENT)
Hi Dino, On 10/14/2016 08:04 AM, Dino Farinacci wrote: >> Thanks for taking care of my DISCUSS points. I will clear but I note that >> the COMMENT points below still seem pertinent. > > Thanks again for your comments Suresh. No problem. I had already cleared as my DICSUSS points were addressed. Thanks for taking care of these comments as well. Regards Suresh ___ lisp mailing list lisp@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
Re: [lisp] Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on draft-ietf-lisp-lcaf-17: (with COMMENT)
> Thanks for taking care of my DISCUSS points. I will clear but I note that > the COMMENT points below still seem pertinent. Thanks again for your comments Suresh. > * Can you please clarify why Rsvd2 is reserved for future use but this > document already ends up specifying it under “Segmentation" I have done fixed this. > * I think the reference for AFI is not correct. Shouldn't it be > http://www.iana.org/assignments/address-family-numbers/address-family-numbers.xhtml? > The current reference leads to a generic IANA page. I missed this on your first set of comments. Added now. > * Section 4.8: > > Is the explanation for the AFI correct? The source dest lookups don't > seem to be multicast addresses. > > "When a specific AFI has its own encoding of a multicast address, this > field must be either > a group address or a broadcast address.” I fixed this to refer to “y” for the destination prefix only. Thanks, Dino ___ lisp mailing list lisp@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
