On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 1:18 AM, Jan j...@agetty.de wrote:
Hi,
on my local pfSense installation running 2.0.1 I'm using pfflowd to send
netflow datagrams to a centralized collector, which works like a charm.
However, pfflowd doesn't seem to include tcp flags as well. I already tried
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 2:29 AM, Bill Yuan byc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
on pfsense ,actually is using fwd 127.0.0.1:8080 to redirect the traffic to
the captive portal when the ip is not allow to go through.
but is it possible to add an extra parameter there, like i want to have a
MAC address
Thanks,
Yes you are right, But if I want to get VLAN number on the captive portal ,
then how ?
on ipfw rule , there has no way to pass parameter, right ?
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 2:34 PM, Chris Buechler c...@pfsense.org wrote:
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 2:29 AM, Bill Yuan byc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Setting up pfsense on a physical server with 2 onboard NICs. The
available bandwidth is more than enough (gigabit interfaces for a 10mbps
WAN and 100mbps LAN). I think I should do an LAGG interface, then put
VLAN interfaces on it, but is the added redundancy worth the hassle?
Thanks,
Am 4. April 2012 14:47 schrieb Ugo Bellavance u...@lubik.ca:
Hi,
Setting up pfsense on a physical server with 2 onboard NICs. The
available bandwidth is more than enough (gigabit interfaces for a 10mbps
WAN and 100mbps LAN). I think I should do an LAGG interface, then put VLAN
interfaces
Dyn.com's free service has been working well for me for years.
--
David
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 9:16 AM, Gavin Will gavin.w...@exterity.com wrote:
Hi there,
Can people please give me their experience / recommendations with regards
to a 3rd party DynDNS service that will work with PFsense.
On Apr 4, 2012, at 10:25 AM, David Miller wrote:
Dyn.com's free service has been working well for me for years.
--
David
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 9:16 AM, Gavin Will gavin.w...@exterity.com wrote:
Hi there,
Can people please give me their experience / recommendations with regards to
a
Any way, If only you use dyndns the service will be continue free
Atte.,
Antonio Cortés Alhambra
From: list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org [mailto:list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org]
On Behalf Of David Miller
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2012 2:31 PM
To: pfSense support and discussion
Subject:
I think you're missing the last point in the section from their website.
You get to keep 1 host name for free for trying their pro product. So
there is still a free option from Dyn it's just limited to a single host
and you have to sign up for a pro trial and then cancel it.
--
David
On Wed,
On 2012-03-22 08:32, Adam Thompson wrote:
Ok, but are there drawbacks compared to an alias VIP?
None that I've run into personally. The one I can think of is that you
can't (or rather, shouldn't) run CARP on the same network (or VLAN, or...)
as any Cisco HSRP devices because they use the same
Dear friends:
last week I replaced my old pfSense 1.2.3 with a new hardware with pfSense
2.0.1
I made a new configuration similar to the previous firewall. Same WAN IP
and LAN IP than older.
I have an FTP server on the LAN, which meets requirements active and
pasives.
In the pfSense 2.0.1 I
I would like to add Pfsense monitoring to my managed services software,
but I can't seem to find any mibs for it anywhere. If I can get a set
of mibs and build a monitoring script I think more managed services
would adopt Pfsense over some of the other firewalls.
On 4/4/2012 4:07 PM, Drew Lehman wrote:
I would like to add Pfsense monitoring to my managed services software,
but I can't seem to find any mibs for it anywhere. If I can get a set
of mibs and build a monitoring script I think more managed services
would adopt Pfsense over some of the other
On 4/4/2012 9:29 AM, Ugo Bellavance wrote:
Hmm, theoretically, I think my idea may work, but I think in practice it
is not possible to configure an lagg interface without having at least
one (temporary) nic available during the configuration.
It depends on your switch.
I don't recall what the
Ok, but are there drawbacks compared to an alias VIP?
In virtual environments you have to take care that the virtual switches
allow/permit this type of traffic. (p.e. on ESX )
the same rule is valid for physical environments, but the most do it out of
the box.
--
= = =
Am 4. April 2012 15:29 schrieb Ugo Bellavance u...@lubik.ca:
On 2012-04-04 09:19, Michael Schuh wrote:
Am 4. April 2012 14:47 schrieb Ugo Bellavance
u...@lubik.ca
mailto:u...@lubik.ca:
Hi,
Setting up pfsense on a physical server with 2 onboard NICs. The
available bandwidth
To connect from the Internet in passive mode, with pfSense 1.2.3 works
perfectly, however with pfSense 2.0.1 there is not response to a ls or dir
command, and I can not transfer files.
What is the difference? What other settings must be configured manually in
version2.0.1?
Hi. Do you have a
I apologize if this goes twice. I sent it out with a screenshot then
figured that would probably not go through the list.
On 4/4/2012 7:00 PM, Drew Lehman wrote:
Thanks Jim,
I'm a bit new to this SNMP business. I'm trying to enter the data
into some monitoring software. It's asking for
On 4/4/2012 7:20 PM, Drew Lehman wrote:
I apologize if this goes twice. I sent it out with a screenshot then
figured that would probably not go through the list.
On 4/4/2012 7:00 PM, Drew Lehman wrote:
Thanks Jim,
I'm a bit new to this SNMP business. I'm trying to enter the data
into
any other ideas?
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 7:36 AM, Brian Henson marin...@gmail.com wrote:
yes it is checked and i have unchecked and rechecked it just for good
measure.
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 6:59 AM, Seth Mos seth@dds.nl wrote:
Op 3-4-2012 9:04, Brian Henson schreef:
Another strange
20 matches
Mail list logo
