Re: [pfSense] naive suggestion: conform to US laws

2013-10-15 Thread Alex DiMarco
I have been following this discussion since the start and I have to say that it has been very informative (mostly from a social perspective), but I have been disappointed with the, um, vigorous responses from all sides. The original post was somewhat blunt and probably could be labeled as

Re: [pfSense] not all backdoors are NSA backdoors

2013-10-15 Thread Chris Buechler
On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 12:03 PM, Jim Thompson j...@netgate.com wrote: But first, on the tail of the recent thread that erupted here, consider this backdoor that someone (?) recently (?) discovered (?) in the firmware for certain D-link routers:

Re: [pfSense] not all backdoors are NSA backdoors

2013-10-15 Thread Vincent Hoffman
pkgng allows signed binary packages on FreeBSD and poudriere makes maintaining a repo stupidly simple if that helps. https://glenbarber.us/2012/06/11/Maintaining-Your-Own-pkgng-Repository.html Vince On 15/10/2013 11:08, Jim Thompson wrote: Once upon a time I was the CTO of Wayport. We put a

Re: [pfSense] not all backdoors are NSA backdoors

2013-10-15 Thread Rainer Duffner
Am Tue, 15 Oct 2013 12:24:42 +0100 schrieb Vincent Hoffman vi...@unsane.co.uk: pkgng allows signed binary packages on FreeBSD and poudriere makes maintaining a repo stupidly simple if that helps. https://glenbarber.us/2012/06/11/Maintaining-Your-Own-pkgng-Repository.html AFAIK, it's not an

Re: [pfSense] naive suggestion: conform to US laws

2013-10-15 Thread Robert Skinner
You would have hated the 90s then. Though annoying at times, these displays on mailing lists have also sparked some great technology projects too. Those around in the early BSD days recall such episodes. Not that I am promoting or encouraging such behavior. You will always have “that guy”, at a

Re: [pfSense] NAT-port-forwading problem in combination with SIP/RTP/VoIP

2013-10-15 Thread Vick Khera
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 7:48 AM, Claudio Thomas claudio.tho...@ezi.dewrote: So my guess is that NAT+Portforwarding is not working correctly. Can anyone help? Thanks, Claudio PS: annexed some details... asterisk - siproxd 0.8.0_2/pfSense 2.1(i386) - sipgate 10.150.0.14 -

Re: [pfSense] SIP problems.

2013-10-15 Thread Jon Gerdes
I use these parameters which seem to work regardless of where the phone is (NAT or VPN) nat=yes for all devices whether internal (VPN) or external Set the RTP ports to the same as the Asterisk server or make the server range a superset of the device's ranges Enable symmetric RTP Enable keep

Re: [pfSense] naive suggestion: conform to US laws

2013-10-15 Thread Alex DiMarco
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 8:20 AM, Robert Skinner rob...@robertskinner.comwrote: You would have hated the 90s then. Interesting time that was, no particular hate though for that period.. Now the 80's on the other hand :*) Though annoying at times, these displays on mailing lists have also

Re: [pfSense] naive suggestion: conform to US laws

2013-10-15 Thread Jim Thompson
On Oct 15, 2013, at 8:53 AM, Alex DiMarco a...@cs.toronto.edu wrote: On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 8:20 AM, Robert Skinner rob...@robertskinner.com wrote: You would have hated the 90s then. Interesting time that was, no particular hate though for that period.. Now the 80's on the other hand

Re: [pfSense] naive suggestion: conform to US laws

2013-10-15 Thread Alex DiMarco
Interesting time that was, no particular hate though for that period.. Now the 80's on the other hand :*) It was only the music that sucked in the 80s… Oh, and the clothing / hair styles, and the politics, and … :-) I do have a soft spot for the music So what excuse do I have,

Re: [pfSense] NAT-port-forwading problem in combination with SIP/RTP/VoIP

2013-10-15 Thread Vick Khera
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 10:04 AM, Claudio Thomas claudio.tho...@ezi.dewrote: BTW: What do you mean with client and not peer? Allowed sip-types are peer, user or friend (http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/Asterisk+sip+type ) My asterisk (actually it is Switchvox GUI running asterisk