Re: [pfSense] pfsense + carp + ha

ation Synchronization Settings (XMLRPC Sync)" there is a > >> "Remote System Username" field. That field is ignored, and "admin" is > >> always used. > >> > >> -- > >> > >> Steve Yates > >> ITS, Inc. > >> > >>

Re: [pfSense] pfsense + carp + ha

t;> "Remote System Username" field. That field is ignored, and "admin" is >>>> always used. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> >>>> Steve Yates >>>> ITS, Inc. >>>> >>>> -Original

Re: [pfSense] pfsense + carp + ha

hronization Settings (XMLRPC Sync)" there is a > >> "Remote System Username" field. That field is ignored, and "admin" is > >> always used. > >> > >> -- > >> > >> Steve Yates > >> ITS, Inc. > >> >

Re: [pfSense] pfsense + carp + ha

org> Subject: Re: [pfSense] pfsense + carp + ha ok. does it also sync all settings like ipsec and openvpn keys? Eero ___ pfSense mailing list https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold

Re: [pfSense] pfsense + carp + ha

ation Synchronization Settings (XMLRPC Sync)" there is a > >> "Remote System Username" field. That field is ignored, and "admin" is > >> always used. > >> > >> -- > >> > >> Steve Yates > >> ITS, Inc. > >> > >>

Re: [pfSense] pfsense + carp + ha

essage- >> From: List [mailto:list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org] On Behalf Of Eero >> Volotinen >> Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2016 2:20 PM >> To: pfSense Support and Discussion Mailing List <list@lists.pfsense.org> >> Subject: [pfSense] pfsense + carp + ha >>

Re: [pfSense] pfsense + carp + ha

t [mailto:list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org] On Behalf Of Eero > Volotinen > Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2016 2:20 PM > To: pfSense Support and Discussion Mailing List <list@lists.pfsense.org> > Subject: [pfSense] pfsense + carp + ha > > Hi List, >

Re: [pfSense] pfsense + carp + ha

Yates ITS, Inc. -Original Message- From: List [mailto:list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org] On Behalf Of Eero Volotinen Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2016 2:20 PM To: pfSense Support and Discussion Mailing List <list@lists.pfsense.org> Subject: [pfSense] pfsense + carp + ha Hi List, What are re

Re: [pfSense] pfsense + carp + ha

I use commodity x86 (64-bit) hardware. I tend to make my pairs identical, so I know the backup can handle the load if the primary keels over. There's no hard requirement for that, though. On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 3:19 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote: > Hi List, > > What are

[pfSense] pfsense + carp + ha

Hi List, What are requirements for pfsense ha clustering? does any of x86 hardware work with ha? does hardware need to be identical? -- Eero ___ pfSense mailing list https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list Support the project with Gold!

Re: [pfSense] Pfsense CARP

Just to close the case. I'm using LAGG in all my carp interfaces and I was using LOAD BALANCE algorithm. I changed to FAILOVER and it seems to be working well. It was something on my switch (Dell N Series), but I'll investigate later. Thanks! On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 10:45 AM, Sergio Mira -

[pfSense] Pfsense CARP

Hello all, I'm working at a scenario where all my interfaces are using CARP over lagg. When I disable (on switch) a lagg linked to my primary pf, that interface becomes *INIT *on primary node and *MASTER *on my secondary node. Problem is the other interfaces (such as WAN) does not become