On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 01:39, Jim Thompson wrote:
>
> Hmm, No, close, but not really correct.
>
> *all* flash will eventually fail if you write to it enough. It's physics.
I do not disagree of course. Fine with theory.
> SLC NAND flash is typically rated at about 100k cycles, while MLC NAND
On 21-3-2012 18:08, Adam Piasecki wrote:
> What hard drive is recommended for pfSense. Or can someone tell me what
> your running.
Any ide or sata drive should do.
If you really want a SSD drive I recommend the Intel 320 series SSD
drives. These have a capacitor inside which means it will surviv
On 21-3-2012 18:40, Jeppe Øland wrote:
>> I deployed about a dozen Kingston 64G SSDs about a
>> year and a half ago (in laptops and desktops) and I've seen about a quarter
>> of them fail with different symptoms in each case. Garbage
>
> Totally agree. I have gone through 2 Kingston 4GB industria
On 2012-03-21 21:22, Adam Thompson wrote:
Based on that very high-level summary:
-assuming the /28 isn't a true routed /28,
I would have to ask my ISP to get the answer?
What is a true routed subnet? It means that every IP address in the
subnet is availabie in a switch in which you connect y
> On 2012-03-21 21:22, Adam Thompson wrote:
> > Based on that very high-level summary:
> > -assuming the /28 isn't a true routed /28,
>
> I would have to ask my ISP to get the answer?
>
> What is a true routed subnet? It means that every IP address in the
> subnet is availabie in a switch in which
On 3/22/2012 2:43 AM, David Burgess wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 12:17 AM, Chris Buechler wrote:
>>
>>
>> That's not the same scenario you described in the previous thread
>> unless it's just not explained as thoroughly.
>
> In the previous thread I included a second pfsense, but didn't menti
On Mar 22, 2012, at 2:08, Dimitri Alexandris wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 01:39, Jim Thompson wrote:
>>
>> Hmm, No, close, but not really correct.
>>
>> *all* flash will eventually fail if you write to it enough. It's physics.
>
> I do not disagree of course. Fine with theory.
Theory
Hi,
Any recommendations for free software for sflow/netflow data analysis?
Thanks,
Ugo
___
List mailing list
List@lists.pfsense.org
http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
> To: list@lists.pfsense.org
> From: u...@lubik.ca
> Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 10:02:58 -0400
> Subject: [pfSense] sflow/netflow software
>
> Hi,
>
> Any recommendations for free software for sflow/netflow data analysis?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ugo
>
the cisco tool is free
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/pr
Hi,
have you tried PFlowd for PFsense?
Choose it in the packetmanager for install.
-m.
Am 22.03.2012 15:02, schrieb Ugo Bellavance:
> Hi,
>
> Any recommendations for free software for sflow/netflow data analysis?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ugo
>
> ___
> List
The only free one I have used is ntop. I don't think it does sflow but it does
support netflow.
-Original Message-
From: list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org [mailto:list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org] On
Behalf Of Ugo Bellavance
Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2012 10:03 AM
To: list@lists.pfsense.org
http://www.networkmanagementsoftware.com/5-free-netflow-analyzer-tools-for-windows
Am 22.03.2012 15:02, schrieb Ugo Bellavance:
> Hi,
>
> Any recommendations for free software for sflow/netflow data analysis?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ugo
>
> ___
> List mailin
On 2012-03-22 10:10, OSN | Marian Fischer wrote:
Hi,
have you tried PFlowd for PFsense?
Choose it in the packetmanager for install.
Not really, but
- I wouldn't want the software to run on my pfsense, as it would gather
(s|net)flows from my switches as well.
- Isn't pfflowd just a software
On 3/22/2012 9:52 AM, Jim Thompson wrote:
Yes, and I discussed this, but better than this is wear-leveling, which works
to avoid the issue, rather than reacting to failure. Combine this with some of
the advanced error correction, and you can greatly extend the lifetime of
(especially MLC-base
For everyone, real world write tests (with synthetic writes), notice most
drives able to write hundreds of TiB some approaching a PiB --
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?271063-SSD-Write-Endurance-25nm-Vs-34nm
Adam - If you partition free space (under provision) the modern drives
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 9:15 AM, Adam Piasecki
wrote:
> 1) Windows has TRIM support for ware-leveling. Does FreeBSD include this?
I can't speak to FreeBSD, but pfsense does not as of 2.0
> 2) If 8.1 does not support ware-leveling, would it be recommend that we not
> use SSD for pfSense until i
NFsen - http://nfsen.sourceforge.net/
and
FlowViewer - http://ensight.eos.nasa.gov/FlowViewer/
FlowViewer (NASA) seems to be down at the moment though.
Mike
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 7:20 AM, Ugo Bellavance wrote:
> On 2012-03-22 10:10, OSN | Marian Fischer wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> have you trie
On 3/22/2012 12:06 PM, David Burgess wrote:
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 9:15 AM, Adam Piasecki
wrote:
1) Windows has TRIM support for ware-leveling. Does FreeBSD include this?
I can't speak to FreeBSD, but pfsense does not as of 2.0
2) If 8.1 does not support ware-leveling, would it be recomm
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Adam Piasecki
wrote:
> O
> I have two questions,
>
> 1) Windows has TRIM support for ware-leveling. Does FreeBSD include this?
> Looking at the wiki page for TRIM (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TRIM) it
> does not for 8.1, only for low level formatting.
>
> 2) If 8
On Mar 22, 2012, at 10:15 AM, Adam Piasecki wrote:
> On 3/22/2012 9:52 AM, Jim Thompson wrote:
>> Yes, and I discussed this, but better than this is wear-leveling, which
>> works to avoid the issue, rather than reacting to failure. Combine this
>> with some of the advanced error correction, an
On 3/22/2012 7:00 PM, Jim Thompson wrote:
> No, but FreeBSD 9.0 (which is to be the base for pfSense 2.1) does
> support TRIM for ffs.
> http://www.freebsd.org/releases/9.0R/relnotes-detailed.html#FS
Not quite. We're going with 8.3. Too many problems with 9 for a timely
release.
8.3 should also h
FYI-
2.1 snapshots are going again.
http://snapshots.pfsense.org/
If you want to track via auto update...
pfSense i386 2.1 DEVELOPMENT snapshots
http://snapshots.pfsense.org/FreeBSD_RELENG_8_3/i386/pfSense_HEAD/.updaters
pfSense amd64 2.1 DEVELOPMENT snapshots
http://snapshots.pfsense.org/Free
Hi All, bit of a curly one here today.
We've had a Pfsense instance that's filled up it's disk, (via squid,
that seems to be configured to only let 1gig be cached - which is an
issue also) - but the odd thing is that the when the disk filled up, the
pfsense machine seemed to hang. stopping al
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 6:32 AM, Jim Pingle wrote:
> Is this your only WAN?
No. It is one of a load-balanced pair.
> Does your rule passing out traffic to this server
> have a gateway set?
Yes. All traffic from the LAN to this server is policy routed through
the correct gateway.
> If that is
24 matches
Mail list logo
