On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 2:27 AM, Erik Friesen wrote:
> Yeah, thanks. I looked around the developer site for a code overview but
> didn't see much.
>
> Where do you think the crux of the matter lies, in racoon, setkey, or the
> way freebsd is handling it?
>
>
racoon + setkey.
There is all that is
I was under the impression that unbound would be faster do to its
caching. dnsmasq doesn't cache does it? I actually notice a difference
once the initial lookup is done but over all unbound seems really flaky.
It also doesn't appear to be very stable.
On 2/16/2014 9:55 AM, Adam Thompson wrote:
I was about to post the same question. Thanks Brian, been facing a problem
with this in my 2 pfsense setup.
On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 7:20 PM, Brian Candler wrote:
> I have a question about pfsync failover.
>
> Suppose you have a master/slave firewall pair; the master is broadcasting
> updates t
On 14-02-16 08:11 AM, Brian Caouette wrote:
What do you recommend for settings? Can you provide some screen shots?
I also noticed the stats this morning show nothing in the unbound
cache. No mater how many sites I visit nothing shows up in there.
Yesterday when it first started working there w
What do you recommend for settings? Can you provide some screen shots?
I also noticed the stats this morning show nothing in the unbound cache.
No mater how many sites I visit nothing shows up in there. Yesterday
when it first started working there were thousands. Not sure whats going
on with
I have a question about pfsync failover.
Suppose you have a master/slave firewall pair; the master is
broadcasting updates to its state table and the slave is picking them
up. Then you reboot the master firewall. The slave firewall takes over.
When the master firewall comes back, its state ta
