[pfSense] allow all except one port

2014-09-11 Thread Faisal Gillani
Hello everyone I am a newbie with pfSense, I want to create a firewall rule which will allow any port except one or two port. So far I am unable to find such option, can you help ? Regards Faisal ___ List mailing list List@lists.pfsense.org

Re: [pfSense] allow all except one port

2014-09-11 Thread Usama Ahmad
Hello Faisal, You will need a rule to allow all ports and above that, rules for each port you wish to block. PfSense goes through rules in a sequence from top to bottom. So it will block the ports specified in each rule and let the rest pass. hope that helps, Usama On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 2:22

Re: [pfSense] allow all except one port

2014-09-11 Thread Tim Dickson
Or even better... ONLY put the two specific allow rules. PfSense blocks by default so the rest will be blocked. (And rules are top down) This would be on the rules tab for the interface you are connecting from (usually LAN) On Sep 10, 2014 11:42 PM, Usama Ahmad u.us...@gmail.com wrote: Hello

Re: [pfSense] allow all except one port

2014-09-11 Thread khmasood
Create a block rule and place it above allow all port rule. Regards, Khurram Hello everyone I am a newbie with pfSense, I want to create a firewall rule which will allow any port except one or two port. So far I am unable to find such option, can you help ? Regards Faisal

Re: [pfSense] menu bar in safari on 2.1.5

2014-09-11 Thread Toni Garcia
Hello, I solved the issue by hiding the new Gold menu, by commenting lines 334-341 in file /usr/local/www/fbegin.inc I will wait for next release to check again, when this file will be overwritten. - Mensaje original - De: Josh Reynolds j...@spitwspots.com Para:

Re: [pfSense] allow all except one port

2014-09-11 Thread Faisal Gillani
Thank you all :) From: Usama Ahmad [mailto:u.us...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2014 11:42 AM To: faisal.gill...@akesp.org; pfSense Support and Discussion Mailing List Subject: Re: [pfSense] allow all except one port Hello Faisal, You will need a rule to allow all ports

Re: [pfSense] Upgrade to 2.1.5 looses packages

2014-09-11 Thread Odette Nsaka
Here are the packages were not reinstalled Alix 1): $ df -hm Filesystem1M-blocks Used Avail Capacity Mounted on /dev/ufs/pfsense0 1845 175 152210%/ devfs 00 0 100%/dev /dev/ufs/cf 4973816%/cf /dev/md0

Re: [pfSense] understand the CARP advskew option

2014-09-11 Thread Espen Johansen
advbase: This optional parameter specifies how often, in seconds, to advertise that we're a member of the redundancy group. The default is 1 second. Acceptable values are from 1 to 255. advskew: This optional parameter specifies how much to skew the advbase when sending CARP advertisements. By

[pfSense] 2 WAN connection and GRE tunnel on 01 WAN

2014-09-11 Thread Lu Nix
Hello all, I am have 02 WAN connections, let's say WAN1 and WAN2 and 01 remote site name SITE_B. I'm am configured WAN1 as default gateway and WAN1 having a GRE tunnel to SITE_B and LANs between 02 sites communicate well via GRE tunnel. At the moment, if I change default gateway to WAN2, LAN

Re: [pfSense] understand the CARP advskew option

2014-09-11 Thread Martin T
Espen, I see, thanks! However, while not the best practice, one could determine the master/backup role solely with advbase, couldn't he? Thats because host with the lowest advbase+advskew value(not just the advskew value) should be the preferred one? thanks, Martin On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at

Re: [pfSense] understand the CARP advskew option

2014-09-11 Thread Jim Pingle
On 9/11/2014 7:23 PM, Martin T wrote: I see, thanks! However, while not the best practice, one could determine the master/backup role solely with advbase, couldn't he? Thats because host with the lowest advbase+advskew value(not just the advskew value) should be the preferred one? Someone