Re: [pfSense] OpenVPN: Unable to contact daemon error
On 1/19/2015 1:27 PM, Erik Anderson wrote: On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 3:16 PM, Oliver Hansen oliver.han...@gmail.com wrote: A bit of a guess but when I've had an issue with the OpenVPN GUI it was something in my OpenVPN Advanced Configuration section that I had added long ago and was no longer necessary or conflicting in some way. Thanks, Oliver. I double-checked that config section, and it's empty. -Erik ___ pfSense mailing list https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold Long ago I had to add a line something like 'management 127.0.0.1 ' was a port number I don't recall. I looked inside one of my openvpn server conf file (/var/etc/openvpn/server1.conf) and saw the line management /var/etc/openvpn/server1.sock unix Make sure you have something similar in pfsense generated conf file. Check logs for messages 'socket bind failed' . -- Jason ___ pfSense mailing list https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold
Re: [pfSense] Triple WAN
On 9/8/2014 10:07 AM, Joe Laffey wrote: Hi, Anyone using Load Balancing for a triple WAN setup? This work OK in pfSense? What about older 1.2.3 systems? Thanks, Yes. I've used triple wan since 2.0, I had dual wan during 1.2.3 versions. I would recommend using the latest version pfSense. It is much easier to setup load balancing/fail-over than 1.2.3. https://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/Multi-WAN_2.0 ___ List mailing list List@lists.pfsense.org https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
Re: [pfSense] Intel Pro/1000 PT Quad Port PCI-e Gigabit Ethernet
On 5/9/2014 3:02 PM, Dave Warren wrote: Anyone have experience with a Intel Pro/1000 PT Quad Port PCI-e Gigabit Ethernet Server Adapter EXP19404PT on pfSense? From wandering the forums it looks like it should be supported in pfSense 2, but I can't find any confirmation that it actually works. Or alternatively, can anyone else recommend a quad port that's available at a reasonable price for a small deployment? I have Intel Pro/1000PT Quad port (low-profile if that matters) in my home pfSense box. I just installed it 2 weeks ago actually (recent cheap ebay find). I have has no issue so far, but I am not a too demanding user. Check out the FreeBSD 8.3 HCL for supported network cards. http://www.freebsd.org/releases/8.3R/hardware.html#ETHERNET ___ List mailing list List@lists.pfsense.org https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
Re: [pfSense] 2.0.1-RELEASE, dual-WAN with loadbalancing
On 2/19/2013 1:54 PM, Chris Bagnall wrote: I'm using 2.0.1-RELEASE, in a dual-WAN configuration with loadbalancing. Some websites that require a login apparently do not like that, as I'm constantly being asked to re-authenticate. Is there a way to make pfSense remember the pairs of source and destination IP, and only use the other WAN interface after a timeout of 5 minutes or so has been exceeded, if the same IP pairs want to talk to each other again? You may find enabling 'sticky connections' in Advanced Settings might do what you wish. Kind regards, Chris I also had this issue while back. But I solved it differently (although sticky connections would fix this for sure). I made the assumption that most websites are using https for authentication. So I forced https traffic through a fail-over routing group instead of load balancing. For me turning on sticky connections prevents connection load-balancing for torrents, and other multi-part downloads (ex. Steam and Origin game clients). -- Jason ___ List mailing list List@lists.pfsense.org http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
Re: [pfSense] Per-Host Current Throughput?
On 2/28/2012 1:40 PM, Oliver Hansen wrote: On Feb 28, 2012 12:27 PM, "Adam Piasecki" apiase...@midatlanticbb.com wrote: On 2/28/2012 3:12 PM, Tim Nelson wrote: Greetings- I remember around the time of the 2.0 betas (or as an addon to the 1.x branch), there was a way to see the bandwidth used per host. It was displayed next to the SVG graph for the selected interface. However, I'm completely unable to see how this was previously done. Am I missing something completely obvious? --Tim _ This works for me on 2.0.1. No packages needed. Thanks, Adam -- Adam M Piasecki MidAtlanticBroadband Office: 410-727-8250 x 123 Cell: 940-224-4837 Fax: 410-727-8245 ___ List mailing list List@lists.pfsense.org http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list You do need to access the traffic graph page. It doesn't show on the dashboard iirc. ___ List mailing list List@lists.pfsense.org http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list Maybe the OP has a similar issue to what I have. Status - Traffic Graph - LAN Interface I never see any entries in the table to the right of the graph. I have this issue on multiple 2.0.1 boxes. It has been an problem for me since 2.0 RC. Last time I have seen it worked was 1.2.3 with the Rate package installed. -- Jason ___ List mailing list List@lists.pfsense.org http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
