I am sure that I did something wrong here and I was wondering if someone
could explain what. I have a cable connection that is rated at 50/10 Mb.
If I let it go on it's own I will get about 60/12 Mb but I will also get
bufferbloat in the range of 2000 to 3000 ms. To deal with this I wanted to
sound like using Proxy ARP would be the best choice. But
are there any disadvantages? What about performance?
Regards.
On 3/8/2015 7:42 AM, PiBa wrote:
Says it all:
https://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/What_are_Virtual_IP_Addresses
Which is better, that depends on what you need it to do.
Tim
blah blah.
ED.
On 2015, Mar 6, at 4:16 PM, Tim Hogan t...@hoganzoo.com wrote:
I am looking for some advice from the group about the best way to put pfSense
in my environment so that it can filter all traffic. The cable provider that I
use has given me a /29 of static IP address
Yes, I guess I want to know if the bridge is set up correctly when one
of the interfaces in the bridge has an IP address that is being used for
the NAT address for my internal LAN.
Regards,
Tim
On 3/6/2015 3:07 PM, WebDawg wrote:
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 2:16 PM, Tim Hogan t...@hoganzoo.com
I am looking for some advice from the group about the best way to put
pfSense in my environment so that it can filter all traffic. The cable
provider that I use has given me a /29 of static IP address and one of
those addresses is assigned to the cable modem. When I asked about
putting the
Hello All,
I am using pfSense v2.2 and I have been seeing a bunch of firewall log
entries blocking traffic to the 169.254.0.0/16 netblock. This traffic
seems to be created by an older NAS that I have and I really do not want
these message in my logs. So, my thought was that I would create a
I was able to get vnstat to work by running the following commands
cd /var
mkdir lib
cd lib
ln -s /cf/conf/vnstat
After running those commands all of my previous data was available.
Regards,
Tim
On 1/25/2015 3:54 AM, Doug Lytle wrote:
Brian Caouette wrote:
Lightsquid and vnstat2 do not
