Re: [pfSense] lagg

2012-04-05 Thread Ugo Bellavance
On 2012-04-04 18:05, Michael Schuh wrote: Am 4. April 2012 15:29 schrieb Ugo Bellavance mailto:u...@lubik.ca>>: On 2012-04-04 09:19, Michael Schuh wrote: Am 4. April 2012 14:47 schrieb Ugo Bellavance mailto:u...@lubik.ca>

Re: [pfSense] lagg

2012-04-04 Thread Michael Schuh
Am 4. April 2012 15:29 schrieb Ugo Bellavance : > On 2012-04-04 09:19, Michael Schuh wrote: > >> >> >> Am 4. April 2012 14:47 schrieb Ugo Bellavance >> > >: >> >> >>Hi, >> >>Setting up pfsense on a physical server with 2 onboard NICs. The >>available bandwidth is

Re: [pfSense] lagg

2012-04-04 Thread Moshe Katz
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 9:29 AM, Ugo Bellavance wrote: > On 2012-04-04 09:19, Michael Schuh wrote: > >> >> >> Am 4. April 2012 14:47 schrieb Ugo Bellavance >> > >: >> >> >>Hi, >> >>Setting up pfsense on a physical server with 2 onboard NICs. The >>available bandw

Re: [pfSense] lagg

2012-04-04 Thread Jim Pingle
On 4/4/2012 9:29 AM, Ugo Bellavance wrote: > Hmm, theoretically, I think my idea may work, but I think in practice it > is not possible to configure an lagg interface without having at least > one (temporary) nic available during the configuration. It depends on your switch. I don't recall what t

Re: [pfSense] lagg

2012-04-04 Thread Ugo Bellavance
On 2012-04-04 09:19, Michael Schuh wrote: Am 4. April 2012 14:47 schrieb Ugo Bellavance mailto:u...@lubik.ca>>: Hi, Setting up pfsense on a physical server with 2 onboard NICs. The available bandwidth is more than enough (gigabit interfaces for a 10mbps WAN and 100mbps LAN).

Re: [pfSense] lagg

2012-04-04 Thread Michael Schuh
Am 4. April 2012 14:47 schrieb Ugo Bellavance : > Hi, > > Setting up pfsense on a physical server with 2 onboard NICs. The > available bandwidth is more than enough (gigabit interfaces for a 10mbps > WAN and 100mbps LAN). I think I should do an LAGG interface, then put VLAN > interfaces on it, b

[pfSense] lagg

2012-04-04 Thread Ugo Bellavance
Hi, Setting up pfsense on a physical server with 2 onboard NICs. The available bandwidth is more than enough (gigabit interfaces for a 10mbps WAN and 100mbps LAN). I think I should do an LAGG interface, then put VLAN interfaces on it, but is the added redundancy worth the hassle? Thanks,