[REBOL] Re: Console GUI functions? Re:(8)

1999-12-18 Thread ejolson
Hello, On 13-Dec-99, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>> 2. I don't think the console will support graphical ANSI >>> characters in the forseeable future. > > I guess fonts and gfx engines spcifications become the main problem of > multi-platform compatibility of REBOL. For example how do you

[REBOL] "logical" value referencing ... Re:(7)

1999-12-18 Thread Petr . Krenzelok
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Let's consider now another version of the Mystery Function that has > been discussed in this thread. > > >> container: ["" "x"] > == ["" "x"] > > This word just holds a block of data. The first element of the block > is a reference to an empty string; the se

[REBOL] "logical" value referencing ... Re:(4)

1999-12-18 Thread joel . neely
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > ... > > Therefore my feeling is that the problem you formulate in order to > propose a solution is one you just happily constructed. > The problem I observed (not formulated) was the amount of discussion, and apparent confusion, over the behavior of REBOL in cases su

[REBOL] "logical" value referencing ... Re:(6)

1999-12-18 Thread joel . neely
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I find it much easier to understand to call > "123456" - the series, and > 'a / 'b - indexes into the series > > To me this seems to show better the difference between actions on > the index ('next, ...) and on the series (insert, ...) > A small qualm I have there

[REBOL] "logical" value referencing ... Re:(6)

1999-12-18 Thread joel . neely
Sorry to take so long in replying... [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I believe that in essence we differ on whether the two example functions, > next and insert (and with them all other series related functions), can be > fully, and can only be explained by reviewing how they apply to your case > i

[REBOL] "logical" value referencing ... Re:(6)

1999-12-18 Thread joel . neely
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > On 12/16/1999 at 12:17 AM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > [...] > > On the other hand, I prefer to keep the vocabulary needed to > > describe REBOL to a minimum. I also like to exploit the similarity > > of principles, to keep the volume of information needed to reason >

[REBOL] adding one

1999-12-18 Thread hmf
howdy guys, in the following, set '++ func ['word] [set word (get word) + 1] yabba: 2 dabba: rejoin [{}now/date{}] how would I get ++ yabba to continually increase, from 3 to 4, etc? thanks! -- -t

[REBOL] User Guide in PDF 8) Re:(8)

1999-12-18 Thread allenk
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Saturday, 18 December 1999 9:52 Subject: [REBOL] User Guide in PDF 8) Re:(7) >Allen > My next project will involve realtime conversion of database >output to pdf.. > >Interesti

[REBOL] User Guide in PDF 8) Re:(8)

1999-12-18 Thread slong
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Allen > My next project will involve realtime conversion of database > output to pdf.. > > Interesting idea. Is this to create cross-platform reports? > > So, if Acrobat were installed, and we could output to PDF, Acrobat > could be used it as a print/preview and pr

[REBOL] "logical" value referencing ... Re:(11)

1999-12-18 Thread lmecir
Merry Christmas and Happy New Millenium to you, Russell, You discovered a rather special property of REDUCE: a: "" same? a reduce a insert reduce a "1" print a Results: >> a: "" == "" >> same? a reduce a == true >> insert reduce a "1" == "" >> print a 1 a: [] same? a reduce a insert reduce a "

[REBOL] Re: Parsing Paragraphs

1999-12-18 Thread giesse
Hello [EMAIL PROTECTED]! On 17-Dic-99, you wrote: B> I can easily perform this function with practically no B> programming in Perl, but I need to do it in REBOL, and I'd B> like to do it with a single 'PARSE statement. I've tried With PARSE? One way could be: parse/all text [ any [

[REBOL] Re: Towards Christmas

1999-12-18 Thread giesse
Hello [EMAIL PROTECTED]! On 18-Dic-99, you wrote: d> dup: func [ s [string!] n [integer!] /local i r ] [ r: copy "" d> i: 0 while [ i <= n ] [ i: i + 1 append r s ] r ] What about: dup: func [s [string!] n [integer!]] [head insert/dup copy "" s n] Regards, Gabriele. -- o---

[REBOL] "logical" value referencing ... Re:(10)

1999-12-18 Thread rryost
Hi Ladislav Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, December 17, 1999 4:32 PM Subject: [REBOL] "logical" value referencing ... Re:(9) > Hi, Russell, you wrote: > > But I must admit I'm "flabbergasted" at how the func

[REBOL] "logical" value referencing ... Re:(9)

1999-12-18 Thread joel . neely
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Hi Elan. > > Hi Russell, > > The function: > > >> f: func [/local a] [a: "" insert a 1 a] ... > > But I must admit I'm "flabbergasted" at how the function 'f as defined > immediately above, works on repeated > applications... > > It appears that the interpreter is m

[REBOL] "logical" value referencing ... Re:(6)

1999-12-18 Thread joel . neely
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Hi Joel, > > I see that (so far) you chose to ignore my invitation in a previous > message, to comment on whether the logic of my argument is acceptable > to you. My question was addressed personally to you and not > anonymously to the list. > > I conclude that sinc

[REBOL] User Guide in PDF 8) Re:(8)

1999-12-18 Thread bpaddock
> My next project will involve realtime conversion of database >output to pdf.. "HTMLDOC" that you can get from http://www.easysw.com/ does this, as well as comes with source code if you want it. Might give a start to converting to Rebol... :-) >So, if Acrobat were installed, and we could outp

[REBOL] User Guide in PDF 8) Re:(7)

1999-12-18 Thread news . ted
Allen > My next project will involve realtime conversion of database output to pdf.. Interesting idea. Is this to create cross-platform reports? So, if Acrobat were installed, and we could output to PDF, Acrobat could be used it as a print/preview and print module. Hmm, this could fill the ga

[REBOL] "logical" value referencing ... Re:(10)

1999-12-18 Thread news . ted
On 12/17/1999 at 1:04 PM Elan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Much ado about nothing? Perhaps. Much ado, but * not * about nothing. One of the striking things about REBOL is that it moves from the general to the specific, where other languages, I think, may move from the specific to the general.