Yeah, I ran into this as well. It just caused my to not be able to resolve
anything :(
On Thu, 5 Apr 2018, at 11:01 AM, Bryan D. wrote:
> Re: https://www.netgate.com/blog/dns-over-tls-with-pfsense.html
> ---
> Applying the suggested "Custom Options" to the Unbound/DNS Resolver
> configuration
Sorry, mine was indeed on 2.4.X. The daemon appeared to start up but any
queries returned no records.
On Thu, 5 Apr 2018, at 11:20 AM, Steve Yates wrote:
> Wild guess, but did you try it in 2.4.x?
>
> --
>
> Steve Yates
> ITS, Inc.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: List On Behalf Of Br
Hello,
I've got a REST API based application sitting behind a pfSense Load Balancer
(works great!). I want to perform some scaleability testing using pfSense's
traffic shaping capabilities. I was able to configure pfSense to limit total
throughput for a given interface but what I really want
Jason James is no longer with the School District of Milton. If you need
to email the Technology Department please correct your contact list to
hol...@mail.milton.k12.wi.us
If you need to contact Jason James directly his contact email is
jja...@janesville.k12.wi.us
Jason James is no longer with the School District of Milton. If you need
to email the Technology Department please correct your contact list to
hol...@mail.milton.k12.wi.us
If you need to contact Jason James directly his contact email is
jja...@janesville.k12.wi.us
I've been part of the pfsense lists for months but have never really spoken up
about anything. I tried to implement dansguardian in v2.0.1 but failed aswell.
Has anyone found a reliable best practice or guide for this?
James
From: list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org [mailto:list
Absolutely, some of the best support I've had for a software solution to date.
James
-Original Message-
From: list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org [mailto:list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org] On
Behalf Of bsd
Sent: July-03-12 3:24 PM
To: pfSense support and discussion
Subject: Re: [pf
s I'm missing some rule somewhere that I might need but I've tried
fiddling and come up empty.
Can anyone give me some advice on this?
Cheers,
James
___
List mailing list
List@lists.pfsense.org
http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
face.
I'm happy with the config as I have it now but maybe this is a bug or it cannot
work and the documentation might want to mention this?
Cheers,
James
On 30 Jul 2012, at 19:17, Moshe Katz wrote:
> Moshe
___
List mailing list
List@list
How difficult would it be to replace PPTP implementations with OpenVPN for
mobile users?
James
-Original Message-
From: list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org [mailto:list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org] On
Behalf Of Jim Pingle
Sent: July-31-12 7:20 AM
To: pfSense support and discussion
Subject
Hi Gavin,
I've 2 IPSec tunnels and both of the other ends are Cisco ASA devices so
OpenVPN wouldn't be an option. It is working fine with how I've configured it
now, not using PPPoE.
Must just be that it's not possible with PPPoE currently with multiple IP's.
Cheers,
What would this look like connecting from a windows xp/7 client. Would it
still use the PPTP protocol or would it be setup differently?
James
-Original Message-
From: list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org [mailto:list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org] On
Behalf Of Jim Pingle
Sent: July-31-12 9:31
Firewalls' and their ability to better manage your network traffic.
I'd hate to think that they have anything the open source community has not
already had for some time :). Regardless, any insight would be really
appreciated. Thanks guys!
James
y bad situation, merely trying
to provide an intelligent response to someone else's inquiry. The second bit I
was looking to see is a breakdown of where the traffic is coming from, such as
HTTP, P2P, etc, and what IP ranges are the primary culprits as they have
several VLANS. Chee
https://www.untangle.com/store/policy-manager-conf.html
https://www.untangle.com/store/reports.html
A couple of links that I came across that prompted the question this morning.
James
-Original Message-
From: list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org [mailto:list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org] On
Awesome work guys, looking forward to 2.1!
Regards,
James
Sent from my BlackBerry
- Original Message -
From: Chris Buechler [mailto:c...@pfsense.org]
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2012 08:39 AM
To: pfSense support and discussion
Subject: [pfSense] 2.0.2 release now available
info here
I'm always a little leary of the 'beta' term. Once you guys stamp it as a
release quality build I'll move up to it no problem.
James
-Original Message-
From: list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org [mailto:list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org] On
Behalf Of Eugen Leitl
Sent: Decem
That's great to know it's been thoroughly tested out in the wild already and
still considered in beta. If it's already stable enough to run as your primary
version, what's left before 2.1 goes release?
James
-Original Message-
From: list-boun...@lists.pfsense.o
I had a similar situation that I resolved using nprev2 package and nagios,
I sent a ping from the pfsense box to my sip providers ip, we charted the
latency and found that it was in the neighborhood of 80ms on average, that
prompted us to switch up to a different ISP at the location and once that
w
Has anyone had any kind of success running an open source or commercial
alternative to riverbed for WAN optimization? It would be great if some of
solution like this was available and even better if we could run it inside of
pfsense. Cheers.
James
Hi Jim,
That’s very interesting. If not directly integrated into pfsense how do you
envision it might take shape? What do you think of Glenn Kelley’s comment
about the very impressive numbers he’s been getting using Traffic Squeezer?
James
From: list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org [mailto:list
and one when it goes up.
(Also, given my first query, all my TCP connections will stop working
again!).
Many thanks,
James.
___
List mailing list
List@lists.pfsense.org
http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
the exact same hardware) seems
to the running very slow. I have shell access via a serial cable and I
can see with the 'top' command that CPU usage is low, but browsing the
web interface is very slow especially for pages relating to CARP and
Virtual IP setting
On 15 April 2013 15:29, James Bensley wrote:
> Although my tests
> aren' proving successful so far.
I meant to say; I am pulling a file via SCP from a host in the LAN to
a host on the WAN. If I disable CARP on the master to force a fail
over to the backup, there is a pause, and th
backup to fail. Otherwise we have two
outages.
Cheers,
James.
___
List mailing list
List@lists.pfsense.org
http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
ut I can't. I think I will leave it.
Cheers,
James.
___
List mailing list
List@lists.pfsense.org
http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
Jason,
I think what you want is the pflog0 interface.
--
James Records | Principle Network Engineer
M 425.984.4349 E ja...@northshoresoftware.com
W www.northshoresoftware.com
On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 9:46 AM, Jason Pyeron wrote:
> **
> Yes the interface for packet capture is nice
Jason,
Take a look at this:
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/logging.html
Should help you out a bit.
--
James Records | Principle Network Engineer
M 425.984.4349 E ja...@northshoresoftware.com
W www.northshoresoftware.com
On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 1:21 PM, Jason Pyeron wrote:
> **
>
l on Pfsense, though I've never done
this, but with some tweaking, you can probably get this to do what you want
without the need for remote ssh access.
--
James Records | Principle Network Engineer
M 425.984.4349 E ja...@northshoresoftware.com
W www.northshoresoftware.com
On Sun, Apr
ect that is going to need
~35, so a templatized image is a much better solution for me than normal
configs.
--
James Records | Principle Network Engineer
M 425.984.4349 E ja...@northshoresoftware.com
W www.northshoresoftware.com
On Sat, May 4, 2013 at 9:32 AM, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
> Wh
some of this in
the UI, but I'm doing fine with ssh access to these commands for now.
--
James Records | Principle Network Engineer
M 425.984.4349 E ja...@northshoresoftware.com
W www.northshoresoftware.com
On Sat, May 4, 2013 at 11:18 AM, Mehma Sarja wrote:
> dd is fine unle
This may be a stupid question but are you looking in the motherboard bios or
the raid card bios?
Regards,
James
Sent from my BlackBerry
From: pfu...@hushmail.com [mailto:pfu...@hushmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2013 10:43 PM
To: pfSense support and discussion
Subject: Re: [pfSense
Fantastic job all, keep up the great work! My team and I are extremely
appreciative as always.
James
-Original Message-
From: list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org [mailto:list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org] On
Behalf Of Chris Buechler
Sent: September-15-13 2:50 AM
To: pfSense support and
nd click Execute
include("shaper.inc");
include("upgrade_config.inc");
include("rrd.inc");
upgrade_080_to_081();
-Done
James
___
List mailing list
List@lists.pfsense.org
http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
I have one particular firewall that keeps dropping its connection to its
partner. It's a client node connecting to a server. The error seen on the
dashboard is 'No Management Daemon'. If anyone has experience with this your
insight would be appr
Check again. I found that the new servers that google deployed were not
working properly. They would receive the PMTU packet² packet to big² and
would not scale down. They had over 200 servers that had a problem.
___
List mailing list
List@lists.pfsens
Has anyone ever experienced the gui hang or get very sluggish entering NAT
rules and subsequently applying changes afterwards?
James
___
List mailing list
List@lists.pfsense.org
http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
Turned out to be bad/dieing hardware. Replaced the firewall with a new Dell
server and everything is back to normal.
Thanks,
James
From: list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org [mailto:list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org] On
Behalf Of Chris Buechler
Sent: February-23-14 6:16 PM
To: pfSense support and
remain outside the web interface as
much as possible due to the load that it puts on the system.
Any thoughts or experience is appreciated.
James
<>___
List mailing list
List@lists.pfsense.org
https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
og type solution so that
we're not only gathering network data but also logs/health from the routers
themselves? Any tips here before I dive headlong into this?
Thanks,
James
From: List [mailto:list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org] On Behalf Of Chuck Mariotti
Sent: April-07-14 1:04 PM
To: pfS
Amd64 is the 64 bit version that you would want to use on that proc. I386 is
32 bit.
James
-Original Message-
From: List [mailto:list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org] On Behalf Of Brian Caouette
Sent: May-19-14 4:37 PM
To: pfSense support and discussion
Subject: [pfSense] Poweredge 2850
Further to what Walter has said - Double NATB!
___
List mailing list
List@lists.pfsense.org
https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
Not sure if this is exactly what your asking but I have a dashboard setup
for pf logs, I made a reddit post about it a while back:
http://www.reddit.com/r/PFSENSE/comments/2rlm8h/pfsense_docker_elk/
I also use nagios (which i was going to try to package in docker as well
when I get around to it)
This would be useful, I've made a monitoring tool (still unofficial until i
figure out how to get it in the proper package repo) here that I might play
with and see if I can get an alert setup for this by simply loading the
cert page and parsing the expire date.
http://www.reddit.com/r/PFSENSE/com
Is anyone aware of a pfSense config/recipe to safely allow remote SIP
phones to connect a local asterisk PBX?
Regards,
*James Ronald*
<http://www.drewtech.com>
___
pfSense mailing list
https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
Support the p
What is the default gateway of the destination (is there a route back to
pfSense)?
- Jim
On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 1:46 PM, Marco wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Feb 2018 11:59:09 -0600
> Steven Spencer wrote:
>
> > On 02/12/2018 11:43 AM, Marco wrote:
> > > On Mon, 12 Feb 2018 10:21:08 -0600
> > > Steven S
Yılmaz,
Sorry, but why not attach the Airprint to both VLANs?
- Jim
Regards,
*James Ronald*
Drew Technologies, Inc.
3915 Research Park Dr Ste 10A
Ann Arbor, MI 48108
734-222-5228 x617
www.drewtech.com
On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 1:58 PM, Raphaël RIGNIER wrote:
> Le 30/03/2018 à 19:03, Yıl
There is a smoking gun on one of random number generators.
There is strong circumstantial evidence, reason for suspicion, on
suggested Suite B.
AES and SHA look to be fine, but using them gives the appearance to end
users that you might be playing footsie with NIST. Cryptographer Jon
Callas
48 matches
Mail list logo
