On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 1:01 AM, Chris Buechler c...@pfsense.org wrote:
That is the problem. Delete one of the bridges and add all the
interfaces to the other, and you'll be back to the behavior you had in
1.2.3.
http://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/1903
Done and done, wireless is now fixed.
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 1:43 AM, wayne abroue plet...@gmail.com wrote:
To add to this mystery, Could u tell us whats on opt1? And why is it
bridged with LAN?
I couldn't afford a new 16-port switch, so I am using OPT1 and LAN for 2
8-port switches which I already posses.
--
Chris Brennan
A:
On Mon, 2011-09-26 at 10:53 -0400, Chris Brennan wrote:
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 1:43 AM, wayne abroue plet...@gmail.com wrote:
To add to this mystery, Could u tell us whats on opt1? And why
is it
bridged with LAN?
I couldn't afford a new 16-port switch, so I am
On Sep 24, 2011, at 11:44 PM, Chris Brennan wrote:
On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 1:58 AM, Chris Brennan xa...@xaerolimit.net wrote:
As far as I know, it is bridged. I was looking around today but I
couldn't find any kind of bridging interface in the pfsense GUI. I'm
not home right now, but will be
On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 2:57 AM, Chris L c...@viptalk.net wrote:
Yes, it certainly seems that both the LAN and Wireless interfaces should be
in the same bridge group.
Interfaces-(assign)-Bridges
According to that location, the web interface says bridge1 is WLAN and
LAN...
On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 3:30 PM, Chris L c...@viptalk.net wrote:
It doesn't make sense to me to have the LAN interface in two different
bridge groups.
If you want LAN, WLAN, and OPT1 in the same bridge, why not put them in one
bridge?
I've been asking myself that very same question now. I
On Sep 25, 2011, at 12:48 PM, Chris Brennan wrote:
On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 3:30 PM, Chris L c...@viptalk.net wrote:
It doesn't make sense to me to have the LAN interface in two different bridge
groups.
If you want LAN, WLAN, and OPT1 in the same bridge, why not put them in one
bridge?
On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 5:06 PM, Chris L c...@viptalk.net wrote:
I don't know. If it were me I'd delete and rebuild the bridge interfaces.
If your config is otherwise simple, I might just default the whole thing
and reconfigure from scratch.
NEAT! Problem solved. I added opt1, LAN and WLAN
On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 3:26 PM, Chris Brennan xa...@xaerolimit.net wrote:
On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 2:57 AM, Chris L c...@viptalk.net wrote:
Yes, it certainly seems that both the LAN and Wireless interfaces should
be in the same bridge group.
Interfaces-(assign)-Bridges
According to that
On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 9:26 PM, Chris Brennan xa...@xaerolimit.net wrote:
On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 2:57 AM, Chris L c...@viptalk.net wrote:
Yes, it certainly seems that both the LAN and Wireless interfaces should
be in the same bridge group.
Interfaces-(assign)-Bridges
According to that
did u put a firewall rule to allow traffic on this interface ?
2011/9/24 Chris Brennan xa...@xaerolimit.net
I've got pfSense 2.0 running and for the wired side of my LAN, it works
fine. The problem is my Wireless LAN. I can associate just fine, but none of
my wireless devices (Blu-Ray Player,
On Sep 23, 2011, at 11:45 PM, Chris Brennan wrote:
I've got pfSense 2.0 running and for the wired side of my LAN, it works fine.
The problem is my Wireless LAN. I can associate just fine, but none of my
wireless devices (Blu-Ray Player, Sony TV, iPod, Android Phone) cannot browse
to the
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 2:52 AM, Alexandre Paradis
alexandre.para...@gmail.com wrote:
did u put a firewall rule to allow traffic on this interface ?
Yes, this was an upgrade, it was working fine in pfSense-1.2.3 and when I
upgraded, it stopped working and that's what I can't figure out. Why and
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 2:52 AM, Chris L c...@viptalk.net wrote:
Umm.
On the wireless clients, check:
Assigned addresses
Assigned netmask
Assigned default gateway
Assigned DNS servers
There's not much more to it.
Yes, all the clients are assigned IP's via DHCP, so that wouldn't matter
With my setup, i had to add a rule to allow DNS (53)
IPv4 UDPWLAN net*192.168.6.153 (DNS)*none
But i still have some issue ... at least web browsing is working.
2011/9/24 Chris Brennan xa...@xaerolimit.net
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 2:52 AM, Alexandre Paradis
alexandre.para...@gmail.com
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 3:12 AM, Alexandre Paradis
alexandre.para...@gmail.com wrote:
With my setup, i had to add a rule to allow DNS (53)
IPv4 UDP WLAN net * 192.168.6.1 53 (DNS) * none
But i still have some issue ... at least web browsing is working.
No such luck, no change. I have a
On Sep 24, 2011, at 12:07 AM, Chris Brennan wrote:
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 2:52 AM, Chris L c...@viptalk.net wrote:
Umm.
On the wireless clients, check:
Assigned addresses
Assigned netmask
Assigned default gateway
Assigned DNS servers
There's not much more to it.
Yes, all the
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 3:34 AM, Chris L c...@viptalk.net wrote:
Yes, all the clients are assigned IP's via DHCP, so that wouldn't matter
anyway.
It matters if they're given wrong info.
I've double-checked and even triple-checked all my defaults. My clients
get an IP in the right range,
On Sep 24, 2011, at 8:22 AM, Chris Brennan wrote:
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 3:34 AM, Chris L c...@viptalk.net wrote:
Yes, all the clients are assigned IP's via DHCP, so that wouldn't matter
anyway.
It matters if they're given wrong info.
I've double-checked and even triple-checked all
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 4:31 PM, Chris L c...@viptalk.net wrote:
On Sep 24, 2011, at 8:22 AM, Chris Brennan wrote:
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 3:34 AM, Chris L c...@viptalk.net wrote:
Yes, all the clients are assigned IP's via DHCP, so that wouldn't
matter
anyway.
It matters if
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 4:31 PM, Chris L c...@viptalk.net wrote:
On Sep 24, 2011, at 8:22 AM, Chris Brennan wrote:
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 3:34 AM, Chris L c...@viptalk.net wrote:
Yes, all the clients are assigned IP's via DHCP, so that wouldn't
matter
anyway.
It matters if
On Sep 24, 2011, at 5:29 PM, Chris Brennan wrote:
Oh and here is a screenshot of my Wireless firewall settings -
http://i.imgur.com/wFgnn.png, If more information is needed, please,
let me know and I will provide it.
Are you trying to use the same IP network on the Wireless interface as
22 matches
Mail list logo
