Re: [pfSense] pfsense 2.3 -> 2.4 upgrade?

2017-12-01 Thread Steve Yates
fSense] pfsense 2.3 -> 2.4 upgrade? inplace upgrade from 2.3 to 2.4 looks fragile. is there way to upgrade system to latest 2.3.* series without reinstalling? online upgrade wants to update 2.4.2.. Eero 1.12.2017 16.27 "Alberto Moreno" <ports...@gmail.com> kirjoitti: > The last

Re: [pfSense] pfsense 2.3 -> 2.4 upgrade?

2017-12-01 Thread Eero Volotinen
inplace upgrade from 2.3 to 2.4 looks fragile. is there way to upgrade system to latest 2.3.* series without reinstalling? online upgrade wants to update 2.4.2.. Eero 1.12.2017 16.27 "Alberto Moreno" kirjoitti: > The last version from 2.3.x is 2.3.5 u can stick with latter

Re: [pfSense] pfsense 2.3 -> 2.4 upgrade?

2017-12-01 Thread Alberto Moreno
The last version from 2.3.x is 2.3.5 u can stick with latter u can test 2.4.2 upgrade. On Sun, Nov 26, 2017 at 4:04 AM, Eero Volotinen wrote: > just planning to upgrade my sg-8860 from pfsense 2.3 to 2.4. is there any > known issues? > > it's not so complex setup, but

Re: [pfSense] pfsense 2.3 -> 2.4 upgrade?

2017-11-30 Thread Steve Yates
[mailto:list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org] On Behalf Of Ryan Coleman Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2017 1:54 PM To: pfSense Support and Discussion Mailing List <list@lists.pfsense.org> Subject: Re: [pfSense] pfsense 2.3 -> 2.4 upgrade? Anything that isn’t a maintenance release (2.x.y … the “y” her

Re: [pfSense] pfsense 2.3 -> 2.4 upgrade?

2017-11-29 Thread Ryan Coleman
gt; >>> Steve Yates >>> ITS, Inc. >>> >>> -Original Message- >>> From: List [mailto:list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org] On Behalf Of Eero >> Volotinen >>> Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2017 12:02 PM >>> To: pfSense Support and

Re: [pfSense] pfsense 2.3 -> 2.4 upgrade?

2017-11-29 Thread Eero Volotinen
fsense.org] On Behalf Of Eero > Volotinen > > Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2017 12:02 PM > > To: pfSense Support and Discussion Mailing List <list@lists.pfsense.org> > > Subject: Re: [pfSense] pfsense 2.3 -> 2.4 upgrade? > > > > yes. looks like very similar p

Re: [pfSense] pfsense 2.3 -> 2.4 upgrade?

2017-11-29 Thread Ryan Coleman
-boun...@lists.pfsense.org] On Behalf Of Eero Volotinen > Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2017 12:02 PM > To: pfSense Support and Discussion Mailing List <list@lists.pfsense.org> > Subject: Re: [pfSense] pfsense 2.3 -> 2.4 upgrade? > > yes. looks like very similar problem :) >

Re: [pfSense] pfsense 2.3 -> 2.4 upgrade?

2017-11-29 Thread Steve Yates
:list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org] On Behalf Of Eero Volotinen Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2017 12:02 PM To: pfSense Support and Discussion Mailing List <list@lists.pfsense.org> Subject: Re: [pfSense] pfsense 2.3 -> 2.4 upgrade? yes. looks like very similar problem :) Eero 2017-11-29 18:59 G

Re: [pfSense] pfsense 2.3 -> 2.4 upgrade?

2017-11-29 Thread Tom Müller-Kortkamp
st <list@lists.pfsense.org>; > j...@netgate.com > Subject: Re: [pfSense] pfsense 2.3 -> 2.4 upgrade? > > Hi, > > Looks like "online" upgrade (2.3.5 -> 2.4.2) trashes sg-8860 unit to > "non-working state". (ie. ssl libraries missing and so on) >

Re: [pfSense] pfsense 2.3 -> 2.4 upgrade?

2017-11-26 Thread Eero Volotinen
Hi, Looks like "online" upgrade (2.3.5 -> 2.4.2) trashes sg-8860 unit to "non-working state". (ie. ssl libraries missing and so on) Where I can file critical bug ticket? :D -- Eero 2017-11-26 19:53 GMT+02:00 Daniel : > I Updates 3 Firewalls all without any problems. > >

Re: [pfSense] pfsense 2.3 -> 2.4 upgrade?

2017-11-26 Thread Edward O. Holcroft
My 8860 upgrade was uneventful. Also running ipsec and openvpn. No issues. It did take quite a while to finish. Just don't interfere with it until it's done. I made sure I had a current backup and bootable 2.3.5 on hand before the upgrade in case I had to roll back. Never needed it though. Have

Re: [pfSense] pfsense 2.3 -> 2.4 upgrade?

2017-11-26 Thread Daniel
I Updates 3 Firewalls all without any problems. Am 26.11.17, 13:04 schrieb "List im Auftrag von Eero Volotinen" : just planning to upgrade my sg-8860 from pfsense 2.3 to 2.4. is there any known issues? it's