Hello everyone!
I was reading the changes from XHTML 1 to 2, and saw many intereseting
and improved things. I was surprised when I saw (despite beign very
different ways of coding) the backwards copatibility, at
http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-xhtml2-20060726/introduction.html#backCompat.
There it
On 8/11/06, TuteC [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There it says that almost 95% of the browsers can handle XHTML 2.0,
since it is an XML based anguage and those browsers are also XML
based. Neat!
So, what do you think? Can we just start using these improvements?
I'd say no for the time being, unless
Matthew Cruickshank wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
thank you for the definitive statement.
The blinked text was also in my second post.
now that you understand what i am trying to do, is it possible?
I still don't understand; you have conflicting requirements. Without
putting text in
TuteC wrote:
I was reading the changes from XHTML 1 to 2, and saw many intereseting
and improved things. I was surprised when I saw (despite beign very
different ways of coding) the backwards copatibility, at
http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-xhtml2-20060726/introduction.html#backCompat.
Don't
I recently discovered this article/thread:
http://www.sitepoint.com/forums/showthread.php?t=393445
A good read... and touches on your question a bit:
What about XHTML 2.0?
What about it? It shows no signs of becoming even a candidate
recommendation any time soon. We don't know what it will
Well, thank you all very much! I didn´t know you could do something like
!DOCTYPE html [
!ATTLIST section id ID #IMPLIED
!ATTLIST h id ID #IMPLIED
!ATTLIST div id ID #IMPLIED
!ATTLIST nl id ID #IMPLIED
]
there in the document.
Cheers!
Eugenio.
This was for me REALLY useful.
http://www.sitepoint.com/forums/showthread.php?t=393445.
Many basic things which are not taken seriously (at least by me).
Regards and thank you for the information;
Eugenio.
**
The discussion list for
Thanks to Eugenio, I was reading the article from sitepoint forum.
XHTML 1.1 deprecates the lang attribute (in favour of xml:lang)
and also the name attribute for a and map tags. It also adds a
number of elements for Ruby annotations.
I have a question about XHTM 1.1, Ruby annotations and
Tee G. Peng wrote:
Thanks to Eugenio, I was reading the article from sitepoint forum.
XHTML 1.1 deprecates the lang attribute (in favour of xml:lang) and
also the name attribute for a and map tags. It also adds a number
of elements for Ruby annotations.
I have a question about XHTM 1.1,
TuteC wrote:
Well, thank you all very much! I didn´t know you could do something like
!DOCTYPE html [
!ATTLIST section id ID #IMPLIED
!ATTLIST h id ID #IMPLIED
!ATTLIST div id ID #IMPLIED
!ATTLIST nl id ID #IMPLIED
]
there in the document.
It's called an 'internal subset'. Theoretically, you
RegardsSteve WhiteWebsdezined.comPO Box 931Paris, IL
61944Tel No: (217) 686-4115www.websdezined.com
-Original Message-From: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Friday, August 11, 2006 11:29
PMTo: wsg@webstandardsgroup.orgSubject: digest for
On 8/11/06, Steve White [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Congratulations: You've won most things to do wrong in a single mail
1 ) You can unsubscribe here: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/ (as
stated on the lists' homepage)
2) Even if there were a request unsubscribe functionality, it would
be in the
Dont mail me any more messages to me. I want to unsubscribe from this group.
Please leave me alone.
**The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to
Now that's hillarious11On 8/11/06, Steve White [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
RegardsSteve WhiteWebsdezined.com
PO Box 931Paris, IL
61944Tel No: (217) 686-4115www.websdezined.com
-Original Message-From: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
OMG This is getting better by the minute Should I have put OT in the subject?!!?!?1Nah that would remove from the original sin!!!hahahhahaOn 8/11/06,
dheeraj kothapalli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dont mail me any more messages to me. I want to unsubscribe from this group.
Please leave
Dont mail me any more messages to me. I want to unsubscribe from this group.Wayne Douglas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: OMG This is getting better by the minute Should I have put OT in the subject?!!?!?1Nah that would remove from the original sin!!!hahahhaha On 8/11/06, dheeraj kothapalli
Richard Czeiger wrote:
Hi all :o)
Just thought I'd throw a bit of code out there and see if anyone
thinks it's useful..
Unobtrusive Semantic Branding
http://www.grafx.com.au/dik/branding.html
Basically it allows you to dynamically style a company's brand name
every time it appears on a
That is a nice little chunk of code. I might find that useful in the near
future!
I salute thee.
Joseph Bernhardt
Web Applications Developer
Incomprehensibilities, Inc.
406.587.4875 - Office
406.570.2004 - Cellular
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From:
STOP PLEASE STOP, FOR THE LOVE OF GOD...On 8/11/06, mir ali [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dont mail me any more messages to me. I want to unsubscribe from this group.
Wayne Douglas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote: OMG This is getting better by the minute Should I have put OT in the subject?!!?!?1
Nah
Maybe it is a setting on my end? Not working for me:
Opera
Version9.01
Build8552
PlatformWin32
SystemWindows XP
and I default to fuchsia background-color.
Best,
~dL
It doesn't work on Opera for me, either. But, it works great in FF! :)
Joseph Bernhardt
Web Applications Developer
Is this a joke? Sometimes its hard
to portray sarcasm in an email
Joseph Bernhardt
Web Applications Developer
Incomprehensibilities, Inc.
406.587.4875 - Office
406.570.2004 - Cellular
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
From:
listdad@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wayne,Go to http://webstandardsgroup.org/manage/index.cfm, login and then proceed to the unsubscribe page.Daz
On 11/08/06, Wayne Douglas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
STOP PLEASE STOP, FOR THE LOVE OF GOD...On 8/11/06, mir ali
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dont mail me any more messages to me. I want to
Whether its a joke or not its
highly irritating (both the unsubscribe messages and the lolling
at it). Its making me wonder if its actually worthwhile to be
subscribed to this list at all.
F
FRANCES
BERRIMAN
From:
listdad@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:[EMAIL
On 11/08/06, Wayne Douglas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
STOP PLEASE STOP, FOR THE LOVE OF GOD...
Wayne,
Go to http://webstandardsgroup.org/manage/index.cfm, login
and then proceed to the unsubscribe page.
Daz
I think he was refering to people just not grasping that concept...
I don't want to unsubscribe - I meant stop the unsubscribe messages - they're comming in every 2 minutes!!!On 8/11/06, Darren West
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Wayne,Go to
http://webstandardsgroup.org/manage/index.cfm, login and then proceed to the unsubscribe page.Daz
On 11/08/06, Wayne Douglas
This reminds me of an email a couple years
ago, I think it was to this list. Someone sent a message to her friend about
workplace gossip, friends, and oh my god, can you believe Sharon is pregnant
Just when you get to the point of pulling
your hear out over z-index issues in IE6 a
On 8/11/06, Frances Berriman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Whether it's a joke or not it's highly irritating (both the unsubscribe
messages and the lolling at it). It's making me wonder if it's actually
worthwhile to be subscribed to this list at all.
Funny, po-faced top-posting has the same
Richard Czeiger wrote:
Hi all :o)
Just thought I'd throw a bit of code out there and see if anyone
thinks it's useful..
Unobtrusive Semantic Branding
http://www.grafx.com.au/dik/branding.html
Yes, it's interesting - but is there an advantage over pure CSS? see
[1]. It seems simple,
Title: IE6 ignores white-space; normal?
Hi all,
I have a friend whos come across a problem I havent seen before. I was hoping the folks on this list might be able to help:
I have a block with white-space: nowrap, and within it, another block
with white-space: normal. My browsers (Safari and
And the number of stupid messages everyday makes me want to get away
from this verbosity as well.
A policy on who can send a dozen dumb emails a day to annoy everyone.
Sick of so much crap as well.
On 12/08/2006, at 2:11 AM, Frances Berriman wrote:
Whether it’s a joke or not it’s highly
On 8/11/06, Paul Novitski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Personally I think javascript is an odd choice for this.
...
Javascript is great for immediate user interaction, but for page
modification like this it seems slow, redundant, and inefficient. If
we're generating our pages server-side to begin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
actually, all i was trying to do was see if i could use z-indexing to
put the text over the graphic. i was not really trying for sizing of
the graphic and text. once i had the z-indexing working in all of the
browsers, then i would work on the scaling aspect.
I seem to be getting a peek-a-boo type bug (but in firefox 1.5 linux) with this web template http://delusr.bigpondhosting.com/kam/
. So im told i cannot comfirm this but I was informed by a reliable source.
I have also noticed that with in IE v6 on a MS platform using
XP SP2 there is an issue
33 matches
Mail list logo
