RE: [WSG] Pure CSS dropdown Menu, take II

2006-10-18 Thread Chris Taylor
I'm fine with people using this solution to develop web sites they're paid for. What I don't want to see is people packaging the menu to resell it or to include it in commercial web templates. Thanks Thierry, that's generous of you. One thing I'd like to ask (and I admit this may be

RE: [WSG] IE6 - IE7

2006-10-18 Thread Conyers, Dwayne
John Faulds ink wired: With the public release of IE7 nearly on us I'm just wondering whether it's better to download the fix to stop IE7 installing via automatic update and continue to use IE7 as a standalone, or let IE7 replace IE6 and then install a standalone for IE6.

RE: [WSG] IE6 - IE7

2006-10-18 Thread Dennis Lapcewich
Return Receipt Your RE: [WSG] IE6 - IE7 document:

[WSG] Sticky footer kinda sorta

2006-10-18 Thread Tom Livingston
Hi list, I am in need of a footer that sticks to the bottom of the viewport, but when content runs deep, the footer is pushed down accordingly. Here, for example: http://66.155.251.18/mlinc.com/06/ Can the footer be pinned to the bottom no matter how tall the viewport, but when copy, etc. is

Re: [WSG] Sticky footer kinda sorta

2006-10-18 Thread Clint Ecker
Not sure if this is applicable to your example (it seems as if it might) but A List Apart had an article on footers very recently: http://www.alistapart.com/articles/footers/ -- Clint Ecker | STONE WARD 440 N. Wells, Suite 750, Chicago, IL 60610 Boston | [ Chicago ] | Little Rock

Re: [WSG] Sticky footer kinda sorta

2006-10-18 Thread Matthew Pennell
On 10/18/06, Tom Livingston [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am in need of a footer that sticks to the bottom of the viewport, but whencontent runs deep, the footer is pushed down accordingly. http://www.sitepoint.com/forums/showthread.php?t=143801

Re: [WSG] Sticky footer kinda sorta

2006-10-18 Thread John Faulds
A couple of others: http://www.themaninblue.com/writing/perspective/2005/08/29/ http://garyblue.port5.com/webdev/footertest.html On Thu, 19 Oct 2006 05:54:19 +1000, Matthew Pennell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 10/18/06, Tom Livingston [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am in need of a footer that

Re: [WSG] IE6 - IE7

2006-10-18 Thread Philippe Wittenbergh
Looks like that thing has been released http://neowin.net/index.php?act=viewid=35665 Time to lock one of my VirtualMachines out of software update to keep IE 6, and have the other one allowed to proceed, me thinks. Philippe --- Philippe Wittenbergh http://emps.l-c-n.com

[WSG] Entity Name vs Entity Number

2006-10-18 Thread James Oppenheim
Hello all,A quick question. When marking up XHTML should I be using entity names or entity numbers? Is there a standard or best practice?Be one of the first to try Windows Live Mail. ***List Guidelines:

Re: [WSG] Pure CSS dropdown Menu, take II

2006-10-18 Thread Lachlan Hunt
Thierry Koblentz wrote: http://www.tjkdesign.com/articles/keyboard_friendly_dropdown_menu/ I just noticed one mistake in the JS. http://www.tjkdesign.com/articles/keyboard_friendly_dropdown_menu/TJK_keyBoardDropDown.js You've used HTML style comments (!-- //--) around the entire script for

Re: [WSG] IE6 - IE7

2006-10-18 Thread dwain . alford
Rahul Gonsalves wrote: I will not be allowing IE7 to be installed on my main computer, until most of the bugs have been worked out, and a couple of security updates have been applied :-). how do you go about doing this? dwain

Re: [WSG] Entity Name vs Entity Number

2006-10-18 Thread Lachlan Hunt
James Oppenheim wrote: A quick question. When marking up XHTML should I be using entity names or entity numbers? Is there a standard or best practice? The correct terminology for entity numbers is character reference, they are not entities. Read this whole article which explains everything

Re: [WSG] Entity Name vs Entity Number

2006-10-18 Thread Dmitry Baranovskiy
Hi James,Theoretically there is no difference. I prefer to use numbers so make it not only valid XHTML, but also valid XML (XSL). It is easier to copy/paste code later. Also Netscape 4.x doesn't work properly with named entities, but who cares… best regards,Dmitry Baranovskiy On 19/10/2006, at

RE: [WSG] Entity Name vs Entity Number

2006-10-18 Thread Herrod, Lisa
That's really interesting, Thanks Lachlan. I remember seeing them referred to as character entities in HTML 4.01 - was that an error in the publication, or is that what they were called back then...? Lisa -Original Message- From: Lachlan Hunt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday,

Re: [WSG] IE6 - IE7

2006-10-18 Thread John Faulds
On Thu, 19 Oct 2006 13:52:17 +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Rahul Gonsalves wrote: I will not be allowing IE7 to be installed on my main computer, until most of the bugs have been worked out, and a couple of security updates have been applied :-). how do you go about doing this? Do you

Re: [WSG] Entity Name vs Entity Number

2006-10-18 Thread John Faulds
http://lachy.id.au/log/2005/10/char-refs Looks like that article's gone missing. -- Tyssen Design Web print design services www.tyssendesign.com.au Ph: (07) 3300 3303 Mb: 0405 678 590 *** List Guidelines:

Re: [WSG] Entity Name vs Entity Number

2006-10-18 Thread Dmitry Baranovskiy
Even better than using references is to encode the file as UTF-8 and just enter the real characters. In ideal world, yes. Unfortunately I have to use entities because of legacy back-end scripts. I even wrote a small convertor[1] for this reason. 1.

Re: [WSG] IE6 - IE7

2006-10-18 Thread dwain . alford
John Faulds wrote: On Thu, 19 Oct 2006 13:52:17 +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Rahul Gonsalves wrote: I will not be allowing IE7 to be installed on my main computer, until most of the bugs have been worked out, and a couple of security updates have been applied :-). how do you go about