Kenny Graham wrote:
those aren't errors, they're warnings. it's still validating, and
just drawing your attention to things that have the potential to cause
problems in some circumstances.
**
The discussion list for
Jan Brasna wrote:
* {background-color : inherit} ?
Do you think this is really necessary? I mean - just for getting rid
of the warnings?
As the validator can't sense the DOM and cascade it can't guess how
the elements would act in the way of placement and contrast
respectively when
Felicity Farr wrote:
Put colour references in instead of ‘transparent’ and it will validate
- guaranteed.
-Original Message-
*From:* listdad@webstandardsgroup.org
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Cole Kuryakin
*Sent:* Thursday, 18 May 2006 3:14 PM
*To:*
Patrick H. Lauke wrote:
Shawn J. Cassick wrote:
i have tossed the class in there instead of the id, but then the css
for some reason wont render on screen.
Of course you need to change your CSS to reference classes rather than
ids. Without sounding patronising, may I suggest a beginners
Ted Drake wrote:
Don’t base your markup decisions on how the final product looks. Base your
markup decisions on what the content is and should be.
So, if the title test is the title of the page, it should be marked up with
a header tag. Placing it in a span, div, p, etc is not giving it the
Kevin Futter wrote:
On 10/5/06 9:45 AM, shawn cassick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i am currently recoding a page from sloppy html to xhtml 1.0
strict, my question is, how can i get around the span duplicate id
defined, as i use css to define a border around the title text,
yes i
Veine Vikberg wrote:
Greetings;
Well, with Ians help I got the looks that I want for the page, and it looks
right in both browsers, however - in IE the dropdowns doesn't show up.
Everything validates to the smallest detail both XHTML and CSS wise.
Any CSS help here would be greatly
Christian Montoya wrote:
On 5/7/06, Rick Faaberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/7/06 1:40 AM Curby [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent this out:
IIRC it was an April Fools post (
http://cssvault.com/gallery/microsoft.php - see site caption)...
though I think that's probably a bit harsh as MS have been
Germ wrote:
Again another thing that im not 100% sure on
the strict DTD for XHTML1.0 doesnt allow javascript right???
so if u want javascript included u wuld use the loose DTD??
Am i right in saying this???
you need to add another meta tag to define what form of text you are
using, if it
CK wrote:
Safari does not like the JS psudo protocol.
On Apr 10, 2006, at 6:34 AM, Fred Ehmann wrote:
I have this simple javascript in the head of a page:
!--
function newWindowMinorSwing()
{
window.open('minor_swing.html','jav','width=550,height=360,resizable=yes');
}
//--
In the
Joseph R. B. Taylor wrote:
Whats to review? a logo, 4 links and badges because you wrote 3 lines
of valid XHTML. It's a really great splash page.
Joseph R. B. Taylor
Sites by Joe, LLC
http://sitesbyjoe.com
(609)335-3076
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Shawn J. Cassick wrote:
http://24.130.225.20/DWS
http://24.130.225.20/DWS/index.htm
just lookin for some input on splash page until site in launched.
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to
Paul Bennett wrote:
Thanks for caring Mike,
I bet this dang GUI I stare at all day wastes a TON of power (dual-screen too -
I can hear the dams draining as I write). Now where's some of those old punch
card computers when we need them?
:)
Paul '2 cans and a piece of string' Bennett
Joseph Bernhardt wrote:
Nick Gleitzman wrote:
Christian Montoya wrote:
#fish { float:right; }
get it? fish floats... har har har. right.
Only fish I've seen floating round here are dead...
N ;(
Well...
#liberals { float: left; }
Sorry. I know we should keep politics out of WSG, but I
14 matches
Mail list logo
