, February 14, 2007 12:05 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: [WSG] Re: digest for wsg@webstandardsgroup.org - Confirmation
Request
This message was created automatically by my Spam Filtering
System at Actrix Networks.
Sorry, but you (wsg@webstandardsgroup.org) are not on my list of
pre
-Original Message-
From: listdad@webstandardsgroup.org
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Anthony David
Pritchard
Sent: Wednesday, 14 February 2007 16:05
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: [WSG] Re: digest for wsg@webstandardsgroup.org - Confirmation
Request
This message
On 12/18/06, Barney Carroll [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kay Smoljak wrote:
At least you will know where to look, instead of trying to work out
which combination of backslashes and asterisks fixed the particular
issue for which version.
One would hope that this information would already be
Thierry Koblentz wrote:
Erwin Heiser wrote:
!--[if gt IE 6]
link rel=stylesheet href=ie7.css media=screen ![endif]--
!--[if lte IE 6] link rel=stylesheet href=ie6.css
media=screen ![endif]--
Why not going with !--[if IE 7] rather than !--[if gt IE 6]
That way you don't have to
On 12/18/06, Geoff Pack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is precisely the problem with conditional comments: You don't know
in advance if any given bug will be fixed in IE8, so you can't know
which conditional you will need.
If you get it wrong, and the bug fix is still needed in IE8 (or is not
Erwin Heiser wrote:
!--[if gt IE 6]
link rel=stylesheet href=ie7.css media=screen
![endif]--
!--[if lte IE 6]
link rel=stylesheet href=ie6.css media=screen
![endif]--
Why not going with !--[if IE 7] rather than !--[if gt IE 6]
That way you don't have to worry about IE 8 :)
---
Regards,
Scroll down
Bruce Prochnau
- Original Message -
From: Carla Drago [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Sent: Sunday, August 20, 2006 7:11 PM
Subject: [WSG] RE: digest for wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
How do I unsubscribe from this list?
carla drago| producer| massive
v
