David Hucklesby wrote:
On Wed, 07 Jun 2006 13:05:35 +0100, Designer wrote:
[...] I have a site with the potential to print out some thirty
different pages, with each printout length between 1 page and 4. Each
page has small illustrations scattered unevenly amongst the text, and
I'm finding
Yeah Mark, thanks
This is the result of the team where noone is listening to the developer
and only think design
and client will be happy, someone has to pay...
Google are probably understanding that the same description and keywords
as well
as the content, are in the both websites... i
McLaughlin, Gail G [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...] Does anyone have html examples of some accessible forms using CSS
that I can reference? There is a need for a plain columnar style form, and
also a form that is a grid. [...]
---
Maybe this'll help you, Gail:
Have you thought of going down the list of proven benefits? Bandwidth savings, faster page load times, search engine optimization, less time spent in page maintenance, etc.? I agree, getting the discussion started the right way is key. I'm doing the same thing with my employer - trying to inject
Dan Treuter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...] What should my primary points be when emphasizing to them the
need for this site to be standards-compliant? [...]
---
Hello Dan,
Thought this is not directly related, it is closely so, thus this article
may still provide you with some needed
Outstanding site! That's going to be very helpful to me.
MACCAWS is actually not maintained any longer, lack of time I'd say, but
I hope we'll continue with the spreading of this message worldwide in
WaSP ILG as we have Stef Troeth (of the MACCAWS team) on board.
--
Jan Brasna ::
I would say the safest arguments would be:
1. Separation of design and content - programmers can't deny the value
of normalization which is the result, plus the ease of design changes on
your end looking forward.
2. The other is accessibility / mobile devices. If you can state a case
that
Thanks to Jan and everyone who replied. Great resources and advice.Dan Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2006 19:47:07 +0200 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: [WSG] selling web standards Outstandingsite!That'sgoingtobeveryhelpfultome.
Jan Brasna wrote:
Outstanding site! That's going to be very helpful to me.
MACCAWS is actually not maintained any longer, lack of time I'd say, but
I hope we'll continue with the spreading of this message worldwide in
WaSP ILG as we have Stef Troeth (of the MACCAWS team) on board.
I think
BTW on the topic of standards thru ASP.NET, this might be helpful as well:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/asp.net/reference/design/default.aspx?pull=/library/en-us/dnaspp/html/aspnetusstan.asp
http://www.456bereastreet.com/archive/200511/no_xhtml_10_strict_in_aspnet_20/
Joseph R. B. Taylor wrote:
Can I ask you linux and mac users to take a look at this design please?
http://wildwood.sitesbyjoe.com/template.htm
Please let me know if you discover any layout quirks or obvious
problems. Should be pretty clean though.
Looked good to me (even though I am not fond
Hi y'all
I'm wishing to persuade a client to produce accessible presentations by
eschewing PowerPoint and using Eric Meyer's S5 templates but I'm running
into the ease of use issue.
The client is not at all adverse to the idea, especially as she'll save
money on getting her PPTs converted
Nathan Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...] Additionally, I wouldn't mix serif / sans-serif the way you did
the in
example. :)
---
Hello Nathan,
I'm curious about the comment? Why not? I ask as I've done this before
myself thinking it was fine.
Say if I want Georgia as the primary type
Hi Dan,
My questions to the group are these: (1) Could they
argue that their development environment (ASP.Net) doesn't allow them to
produce standards-compliant markup and CSS and if they attempt to do that, what
should I reply with? (note: I don't have any practical experience with
My questions to the group are these: (1) Could they argue that their
development environment (ASP.Net) doesn't allow them to produce
standards-compliant markup and CSS and if they attempt to do that, what
should I reply with? (note: I don't have any practical experience with
ASP.Net, but I do w/
On 6/9/06, Mark Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At a pinch, I'll settle for text only but I'd like to show her something
that handles images as well.
Does anyone know of an editor or tool that hits this spot?
DISCLAIMER:
I dont know that much about Dreamweaver, nor do I use it these days
If web-based administration is an option, FCKeditor has a nice built-in
image uploader (text editor). Since she's going to be updating HTML, it
might be easiest to whip up a backend and stick the editor in there for
them to use.
It produces (mostly) clean code out of the box (it is free),
Here's a friendly site to help make the case for standards...
http://www.hotdesign.com/seybold/everything.html
.Matthew Cruickshank
http://docvert.org MSWord to Open Standards
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See
Ah, well as long as you're aware of the change. I tend to group serifs
together, etc. If it doesn't bother you, then there's really nothing
wrong with it. More power to ya. :)
-- Nathan
On 6/8/06, Mike at Green-Beast.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nathan Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
At 10:10 AM 6/8/2006, Matthew Cruickshank wrote:
... convert OpenDocument to HTML ...
Works best if you start with well structured documents, using a
template. Have a look at Peter Sefton's open source ICE system:
http://ice.usq.edu.au/.
For the rationale behind doing it this way and a
Title: Is there a way to stop a horizontal text-based Navbar breaking ...?
Im setting up a small site that will have horizontal text-based navigation at the top. Theres quite a lot of links so its almost certain to go onto two lines. Some of the links are two words ... Is there a way to stop a
James Laugesen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Mike, I could see the link correctly and sent you the email.
My email body was not poopulated correctly (GMail notifier mailto handler)
but I put the details in manually.
I'm interested in discussion on this topic... how did you determine this was
Alternatively you can put a no-break-space between the words instead of a
space. A no-break-space is the six-character string nbsp; so the link would
be something link Contactnbsp;Us
Steve Green
Director
Test Partners Ltd / First Accessibility
www.testpartners.co.uk
www.accessibility.co.uk
Thanks Steve - I should have thought of that!
And thanks Mathew for the info on the CSS white-space:nowrap value. I didn't
know about that ... :)
On 9/6/06 10:58 AM, Steve Green [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alternatively you can put a no-break-space between the words instead of a
space. A
Hi all,
I recall many moons ago a site which had multiple stylesheets (using the link
element). In Firefox, a small icon appeared at the bottom pane of the browser
and allowed the user to switch between stylesheets.
Can anyone point me to a site that uses this technique? I'd like to do a bit
Paul,
You check out this link, http://www.alistapart.com/stories/alternate/
Jon
Quoting Paul Bennett [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi all,
I recall many moons ago a site which had multiple stylesheets (using
the link element). In Firefox, a small icon appeared at the bottom
pane of the browser and
On 06/06/08 17:25 (GMT-0400) Mike at Green-Beast.com apparently typed:
Nathan Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...] Additionally, I wouldn't mix serif / sans-serif the way you did
the in
example. :)
I'm curious about the comment? Why not? I ask as I've done this before
myself
Mike at Green-Beast.com wrote:
I have written a PHP script which I hope will allow a person to post an
email address on a site without worrying about it being found and exploited
by bad'bots.
[1] http://mikecherim.com/gbcms_xml/news_page.php?id=6
Why do you think it's safe to assume that bad
Paul Bennett wrote:
I recall many moons ago a site which had multiple stylesheets (using
the link element). In Firefox, a small icon appeared at the bottom
pane of the browser and allowed the user to switch between
stylesheets.
Can anyone point me to a site that uses this technique? I'd like
Lachlan Hunt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...] Why do you think it's safe to assume that bad bots won't send
User-Agent headers claiming to be IE, Firefox or any other browser they
like? Even if some bots do send different UA strings, this script relies on
a false assumption and, thus,
Hello group,
It appears my experimental solution may be partially viable, but not fully
reliable due to user agent spoofing. In other words, until more testing and
tweaking can be done, the script should NOT be used unless you fully
undertstand that your email may be exposed.
I just wanted to
I've rarely seen weird user agents (suggesting spam bots) hitting any of my hosted sites, but definitely seen a lot of spam find it's way through them. So I dare-say yes, user agent spoofing is very common... I'd even say the norm.
All the user agent information is simply sent in the header of the
I suggest it wouldn't be too much of a stretch for a spambot to do a
bit of regex matching... I'll put it in php because that's what I
know.
First you'd preprocess the page using a javascript processor. This is
an effort but quite possible - perhaps steal some firefox code to do
this, which
-Original Message-
From: listdad@webstandardsgroup.org
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike at
Green-Beast.com
Sent: Friday, 9 June 2006 1:39 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Using PHP to hide email, script made,
testing needed
The sad part is, even
Mike at Green-Beast.com wrote:
Do all spam-bots disguise themselves as common UAs? Common or the exception
to the rule? Does anyone have a handle on numbers or some percentages?
That is impossible to determine because, by their very nature, there is
no apparent distinguishing feature between
35 matches
Mail list logo
