Re: [WSG] Printing business letters from a brower

2006-11-10 Thread Joshua Street
On 11/10/06, Nick Roper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ideally I don't want the user to have to go through any print setup operations each time they print, or to make too many assumptions about their current setup. For example, it would be good if filenames etc were not printed by default at the top

Re: [WSG] We do not support the Safari browser yet

2006-11-10 Thread Matthew Pennell
On 11/9/06, Tee G. Peng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Looking at its code, I do not understand why Safari browser is notsupported.Can someone enlighten me? Thanks!I believe Safari has some issues with certain _javascript_/Ajax implementations, maybe? Or maybe they only had earlier versions to test on

Re: [WSG] safari version of an IE underscore hack

2006-11-10 Thread Matthew Pennell
On 11/10/06, Bojana Lalic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does anyone know of a hack for safari that will enable the css to display ONLY in safari?#mydiv { width: 500px; /* for Safari */}/* all other browsers - Safari ignores rules with a hash/pound after the semi-colon */ #mydiv { width:

Re: [WSG] Printing business letters from a brower

2006-11-10 Thread Nick Roper
Hi Josh, Yeah, I guess that makes sense. I'll get my sleeves rolled up with PHP's PDF libraries. Thanks for the AU$0.02 Nick Joshua Street wrote: On 11/10/06, Nick Roper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ideally I don't want the user to have to go through any print setup operations each time they

Re: [WSG] Print Styles and Display:None

2006-11-10 Thread Rahul Gonsalves
Carolyn Diaz wrote: The layout has a left navigation, header, and footer in tables. I've styled the header and footer for print by using display:none;, but cannot get my main content all the way over to the left margin. It's as if the left navigation is somehow preventing it from moving all the

Re: [WSG] We do not support the Safari browser yet

2006-11-10 Thread Eystein Alnaes
On 11/10/06, Barney Carroll [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Matthew Pennell wrote: I believe Safari has some issues with certain _javascript_/Ajax implementations, maybe? Or maybe they only had earlier versions to test on and couldn't get the site to work in 1.2...Safari's _javascript_ support is very

Re: [WSG] Cynthia Reports Warnings 9.4 and 9.5 as relates to form

2006-11-10 Thread Mel
on 10/11/2006 05:03 [EMAIL PROTECTED] said the following: Please could someone tell me what I'm obviously missing? snip Your text for each input isn't enclosed by the label element so the explicit association is being lost. Instead of: label for=ainput type=radio value=0 name=answer

Re: [WSG] We do not support the Safari browser yet

2006-11-10 Thread Will Jensen Personal Public
Actually this particular site has been like this since a year ago at least when I first came across it. It is quite possible that the developer(s) may have his/her/their biases and used a browser sniffer to flush out the "unconverted" users and let them know how they can become "saved" - (I am not

Re: [WSG] Cynthia Reports Warnings 9.4 and 9.5 as relates to form

2006-11-10 Thread Mike at Green-Beast.com
Hello Sharon, I echo what Mel said, though I'd like to add that the label should probably be the same as the name (and the ID, if needed, may as well match too). label for=answerinput type=radio value=0 name=answer alt=make your mark id=answer /Text/labelbr / Respectfully, Mike Cherim

Re: [WSG] We do not support the Safari browser yet

2006-11-10 Thread Barney Carroll
Will Jensen Personal Public wrote: I caution all designers to never do anything on company or personal sites that may alienate a group of customers who frequently have little say in what browser is on their company-owned computer or who have limited knowledge of how to upgrade their current

RE: [WSG] Cynthia Reports Warnings 9.4 and 9.5 as relates to form

2006-11-10 Thread Patrick Lauke
Mike at Green-Beast.com I echo what Mel said, though I'd like to add that the label should probably be the same as the name (and the ID, if needed, may as well match too). Just being mindful that obviously, for radio buttons, the ID can't match the name, as the former needs to be

Re: [WSG] Cynthia Reports Warnings 9.4 and 9.5 as relates to form

2006-11-10 Thread David Dorward
On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 10:49:43AM -0500, Mike at Green-Beast.com wrote: I echo what Mel said, though I'd like to add that the label should probably be the same as the name (and the ID, if needed, may as well match too). You mean the text used to label the control with should be the same as

RE: [WSG] Cynthia Reports Warnings 9.4 and 9.5 as relates to form

2006-11-10 Thread Emma Sax
I echo what Mel said, though I'd like to add that the label should probably be the same as the name (and the ID, if needed, may as well match too). label for=answerinput type=radio value=0 name=answer alt=make your mark id=answer /Text/labelbr / Being picky, the name isn't actually

Re: [WSG] Cynthia Reports Warnings 9.4 and 9.5 as relates to form

2006-11-10 Thread Nick Fitzsimons
On 10 Nov 2006, at 16:11:14, Emma Sax wrote: label for=answerinput type=radio value=0 name=answer alt=make your mark id=answer /Text/labelbr / Being picky, the name isn't actually required (unless being used in scripts etc). The 'for' attribute of the label gets matched with the 'id'

Re: [WSG] Cynthia Reports Warnings 9.4 and 9.5 as relates to form

2006-11-10 Thread Mike at Green-Beast.com
Patrick wrote: [...] the ID can't match the name, as the former needs to be unique [...] Good point Patrick. Being it's a radio button you're right on. --- David wrote: You mean the text used to label the control with should be the same as the value of the name and id attributes? Actually I

[WSG] zefrank on web developers

2006-11-10 Thread Christian Montoya
Hey list. Just wanted to let you know that zefrank's videoblog yesterday was about web developers. It's really funny and maybe some can relate? Beware though, there's some bad language if I remember correctly, in case that's a problem. Here's the link:

Re: [WSG] Cynthia Reports Warnings 9.4 and 9.5 as relates to form

2006-11-10 Thread Mike at Green-Beast.com
Nick wrote: For other input fields, the name is needed if the form is going to be submitted to the server, as otherwise there's no way to form a name:value pair, and so the field can't be submitted. Good to know. I've always used the name attribute on form inputs. Now I know why ;-) Mike

Re: [WSG] zefrank on web developers

2006-11-10 Thread Mike at Green-Beast.com
Thanks for sharing that. I've seen his videos before and count myself as a fan. He does some great stuff. Okay, I'm off to the smoking terrace now. ;-) Mike - Original Message - From: Christian Montoya [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Sent: Friday, November 10, 2006

Re: [WSG] Font-sizing in quirksmode

2006-11-10 Thread Terrence Wood
On 10/11/2006, at 12:23 PM, David McKinnon wrote: I'm trying to get font sizing consistent between IE6 and Firefox. body { font-size: medium; } /* Make sure IE only sees this... use CC's if you want, I prefer * html */ * html body { font-size: small } /* use your favorite (non-keyword)

Re: [WSG] Cynthia Reports Warnings 9.4 and 9.5 as relates to form

2006-11-10 Thread Terrence Wood
On 11/11/2006, at 4:49 AM, Mike at Green-Beast.com wrote: the label should probably be the same as the name (and the ID, if needed, may as well match too). Disagree Mike, the name attribute on form controls is used server side to process the form. Example: radios should/could have the