On 2017-04-20 16:03, James Klassen wrote:
Speaking as a member of the GeoMoose PSC and as one of the people who
keeps
GeoMoose up to date in OSGeo-Live... It isn't clear to me what to do
about
it but for the record OpenHub seems to be pretty confused about
GeoMoose.
It is missing our early
All,
I just logged into OpenHub and tried to see what updates I could add in there,
and there’s not muchas far as options go for updating things manually, there
are some things. So I guess I’m on the fence about it for similar reasons to
those described by Jim. I’ll wander back into it as
Speaking as a member of the GeoMoose PSC and as one of the people who keeps
GeoMoose up to date in OSGeo-Live... It isn't clear to me what to do about
it but for the record OpenHub seems to be pretty confused about GeoMoose.
It is missing our early history (2005-2009). It is confused about our
Hi Activity Workshop,
Yes, you make some good points, there are a number of things we should
be considering when selecting a project for OSGeo-Live. A more detailed
list is provided in our application form:
https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Live_GIS_Disc_Apply
Cheers, Cameron
On 20/4/17 4:54 am,
On 14/04/17 21:00, live-demo-requ...@lists.osgeo.org wrote:
> While projects should rightly be concerned if OSGeo-Live only uses
> OpenHub metrics to assess project health, they should be significantly
> more concerned about the general public's assessment of their project.
You're correct to say
