Re: [Live-demo] "descoping" OSGeo-Live

2017-04-20 Thread Bas Couwenberg
On 2017-04-20 16:03, James Klassen wrote: Speaking as a member of the GeoMoose PSC and as one of the people who keeps GeoMoose up to date in OSGeo-Live... It isn't clear to me what to do about it but for the record OpenHub seems to be pretty confused about GeoMoose. It is missing our early

Re: [Live-demo] "descoping" OSGeo-Live

2017-04-20 Thread Basques, Bob (CI-StPaul)
All, I just logged into OpenHub and tried to see what updates I could add in there, and there’s not muchas far as options go for updating things manually, there are some things. So I guess I’m on the fence about it for similar reasons to those described by Jim. I’ll wander back into it as

Re: [Live-demo] "descoping" OSGeo-Live

2017-04-20 Thread James Klassen
Speaking as a member of the GeoMoose PSC and as one of the people who keeps GeoMoose up to date in OSGeo-Live... It isn't clear to me what to do about it but for the record OpenHub seems to be pretty confused about GeoMoose. It is missing our early history (2005-2009). It is confused about our

Re: [Live-demo] "descoping" OSGeo-Live

2017-04-20 Thread Cameron Shorter
Hi Activity Workshop, Yes, you make some good points, there are a number of things we should be considering when selecting a project for OSGeo-Live. A more detailed list is provided in our application form: https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Live_GIS_Disc_Apply Cheers, Cameron On 20/4/17 4:54 am,

Re: [Live-demo] "descoping" OSGeo-Live

2017-04-19 Thread Activity Workshop
On 14/04/17 21:00, live-demo-requ...@lists.osgeo.org wrote: > While projects should rightly be concerned if OSGeo-Live only uses > OpenHub metrics to assess project health, they should be significantly > more concerned about the general public's assessment of their project. You're correct to say