Re: [lldb-dev] Search C++ "virtual" objects

> On Aug 12, 2016, at 4:55 PM, Lei Kong via lldb-dev > wrote: > > On Linux, given a core dump file, an executable and its symbols, is it > possible to do the following in LLDB (maybe with a LLDB extension)? > > 1. Get the list of all C++ virtual types (classes

[lldb-dev] FW: Search C++ "virtual" objects

On Linux, given a core dump file, an executable and its symbols, is it possible to do the following in LLDB (maybe with a LLDB extension)? 1. Get the list of all C++ virtual types (classes with virtual function table) 2. Search the whole address space to find all instances of such objects?

Re: [lldb-dev] First hand support for musl-libc

I've merged r277997, r277999 and r278001 to 3.9 in r278540. Cheers, Hans On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 1:02 AM, Pavel Labath wrote: > Hi, > > I do run a basic set of tests (compile+run test suite) on linux from > time to time, but unfortunately I don't have time to be more active

Re: [lldb-dev] LLDB Evolution

> On Aug 12, 2016, at 5:23 AM, Pavel Labath via lldb-dev > wrote: > > On 12 August 2016 at 00:54, Chris Lattner via lldb-dev > wrote: >> I recommend approaching this in three steps: >> >> 1) get the less-controversial changes done that Greg

[lldb-dev] [Bug 28953] New: Xcode build: be explicit about which clang and LLVM .a files get linked into LLDB

https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=28953 Bug ID: 28953 Summary: Xcode build: be explicit about which clang and LLVM .a files get linked into LLDB Product: lldb Version: unspecified Hardware: PC OS: MacOS

Re: [lldb-dev] LLDB Evolution

On 12 August 2016 at 00:54, Chris Lattner via lldb-dev wrote: > I recommend approaching this in three steps: > > 1) get the less-controversial changes done that Greg was outlining. > 2) start a discussion in the llvm community about the concept of a > member/global

[lldb-dev] [Bug 28948] New: TestNamespaceDefinitions fails with gcc < 4.9

https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=28948 Bug ID: 28948 Summary: TestNamespaceDefinitions fails with gcc < 4.9 Product: lldb Version: unspecified Hardware: PC OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal

Re: [lldb-dev] First hand support for musl-libc

Hi, I do run a basic set of tests (compile+run test suite) on linux from time to time, but unfortunately I don't have time to be more active in this. I have just completed the test on the release branch with these changes cherry-picked and it seems to working fine. But I certainly agree that the