Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] [3.8 Release] Release Candidate 2 source and binaries available

2016-02-08 Thread Renato Golin via lldb-dev
On 6 February 2016 at 01:02, C Bergström wrote: > I worked on the port of llvm-OpenMP-formally-known-as-Intel to Aarch64 > - can it be included there as well? (I'm not sure what's precisely > involved - I'm willing to do my best fixing any bugs which pop up - Hi Chris,

Re: [lldb-dev] Question about TestMultipleDebuggers.py

2016-02-08 Thread Siva Chandra via lldb-dev
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 2:10 PM, Zachary Turner wrote: > Why though? Foremost, I think it is because the lldb driver built as part of the test is linked to the host lldb shared library. If you build a 32-bit driver, we will need a 32-bit lldb shared library as well is it not?

Re: [lldb-dev] Question about TestMultipleDebuggers.py

2016-02-08 Thread Zachary Turner via lldb-dev
Ahh yea I missed that. Makes sense On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 2:38 PM Siva Chandra wrote: > On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 2:35 PM, Zachary Turner wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 2:21 PM Siva Chandra > wrote: > >> > >> On Mon,

Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] [3.8 Release] Release Candidate 2 source and binaries available

2016-02-08 Thread via lldb-dev
  Original Message   From: Renato Golin Sent: Monday, February 8, 2016 21:13 To: C Bergström Cc: Hans Wennborg; llvm-dev; release-test...@lists.llvm.org; cfe-dev; openmp-dev (openmp-...@lists.llvm.org); LLDB Dev Subject: Re: [cfe-dev] [lldb-dev] [3.8 Release] Release Candidate 2 source and

Re: [lldb-dev] Question about TestMultipleDebuggers.py

2016-02-08 Thread Siva Chandra via lldb-dev
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 1:36 PM, Zachary Turner via lldb-dev wrote: > Why is this marked @skipIfI386? I don't see anything i386 specific about > this test. Can this decorator be removed? I think skipping for i386 is only because most developers are using 64-bit hosts

Re: [lldb-dev] Question about TestMultipleDebuggers.py

2016-02-08 Thread Siva Chandra via lldb-dev
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 2:35 PM, Zachary Turner wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 2:21 PM Siva Chandra wrote: >> >> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 2:10 PM, Zachary Turner wrote: >> > Why though? >> >> Foremost, I think it is because the

Re: [lldb-dev] Question about TestMultipleDebuggers.py

2016-02-08 Thread Zachary Turner via lldb-dev
Why though? Unless the test explicitly doesn't work on x86 architecture because it uses some unsupported feature, why skip it? If that were truly the reason, then we could just make the entire test suite disable support for i386. On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 2:08 PM Siva Chandra

Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] [3.8 Release] Release Candidate 2 source and binaries available

2016-02-08 Thread Hans Wennborg via lldb-dev
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 3:08 PM, Renato Golin wrote: > On 8 February 2016 at 22:56, wrote: >> Imho it's critical to get parallel programming working on ARMv8 ( even if >> it's crappy OMP) to start. Please enable it and I'll run the tests