Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [4.0 Release] Schedule and call for testers

On 5 December 2016 at 18:26, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers wrote: > I propose the following schedule for the 4.0 release: > > - 12 January 2017: Create the 4.0 branch. RC1 tagged soon thereafter. > > - 1 February: Tag RC2. All lose ends should have been tied up

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [Openmp-dev] [4.0 Release] Schedule and call for testers

On 5 December 2016 at 20:07, Hans Wennborg wrote: > I'm worried that users will, with some reason, think that the 4.1 and > 5.1 releases are the same kind as 2.1 and 3.1 :-/ IMO, this is too small of a worry to encumber us for the rest of our release days with silly zeroes.

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [Openmp-dev] [4.0 Release] Schedule and call for testers

On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 11:00 AM, Renato Golin wrote: > On 5 December 2016 at 18:56, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers > wrote: >> The idea is that Tom's stable releases will keep incrementing the >> "patch" part of the version numbers,

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [4.0 Release] Schedule and call for testers

Hi, plan looks good to me. At OpenMandriva, we're already on the 4.0 branch (rev. 287544 right now) because that's what our next major release (expected in late Q2/early Q3 2017) will ship with. No big issues here so far, except the LLVMAddAttribute removal (Mesa still relies on that API -- we've

Re: [lldb-dev] lldb-3.8.1 prebuilt binary for windows7

The only thing needed to build the installer should be having NSIS installed and building the "package" target generated by CMake. The other prerequisites are mostly for building the visual studio clang-format plugin. Having said that, you don't even have to build the installer to see what goes

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [Openmp-dev] [4.0 Release] Schedule and call for testers

On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 12:02 PM, Renato Golin wrote: > On 5 December 2016 at 19:56, Hans Wennborg wrote: >> I'd like to avoid 4.1 because of the potential for confusion about >> whether it's a major release (as it would have been under the old >>

Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] [llvm-dev] [4.0 Release] Schedule and call for testers

On 5 December 2016 at 19:08, Michał Górny via cfe-dev wrote: > Will this new version scheme mean that 4.1 (if ever released) will be > ABI-compatible with 4.0? If it will be so, we should update SONAMEs > accordingly. Yes. All 4.x will be ABI compatible with 4.0, just

[lldb-dev] [Bug 31104] Standalone LLDB build is broken because gtest is defined twice

https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=31104 Chris Bieneman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

Re: [lldb-dev] lldb-3.8.1 prebuilt binary for windows7

Hi Hans, I'd love to help, but I don't have half the tools that build_llvm_package.bat requires installed on my machine. My setup is to build llvm with msbuild. Is it possible to build the installer this way too? Can you point me to the specific CMake source that determines what's included in

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [Openmp-dev] [4.0 Release] Schedule and call for testers

On 5 December 2016 at 19:56, Hans Wennborg wrote: > I'd like to avoid 4.1 because of the potential for confusion about > whether it's a major release (as it would have been under the old > scheme) or a patch release. But if the versioning scheme is different, users will have

Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] [4.0 Release] Schedule and call for testers

On Mon, 5 Dec 2016 10:26:33 -0800 Hans Wennborg via llvm-dev wrote: > There's still plenty of time left, but I'd like to get the schedule > set before folks start disappearing for the holidays. > > Note that this release will also switch us to the new versioning >

Re: [lldb-dev] lldb-3.8.1 prebuilt binary for windows7

Is anyone working on this? I'm happy to include LLDB in the installer, but I'm really not the best person to be debugging it. If more files need to be included in the install, that's configured in the CMake files (what's installed by the 'install' build target is also what ends up going into the

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [Openmp-dev] [4.0 Release] Schedule and call for testers

On 5 December 2016 at 18:42, Dimitry Andric via Release-testers wrote: > Maybe I didn't pay enough attention, but where is the general outline > for this versioning scheme documented? And are we still going to do > 4.1, 4.2, etc? This is the thread:

[lldb-dev] [4.0 Release] Schedule and call for testers

Dear everyone, There's still plenty of time left, but I'd like to get the schedule set before folks start disappearing for the holidays. Note that this release will also switch us to the new versioning scheme where the major version is incremented for each major release (i.e., when the 4.0

Re: [lldb-dev] [Openmp-dev] [4.0 Release] Schedule and call for testers

On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 10:42 AM, Dimitry Andric wrote: > On 05 Dec 2016, at 19:26, Hans Wennborg via Openmp-dev > wrote: >> >> There's still plenty of time left, but I'd like to get the schedule >> set before folks start disappearing for the

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [Openmp-dev] [4.0 Release] Schedule and call for testers

On 5 December 2016 at 18:56, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers wrote: > The idea is that Tom's stable releases will keep incrementing the > "patch" part of the version numbers, just as today, so they would be > 4.0.1, 4.0.2, etc. Hum, this looks weird. I was under

Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] [Release-testers] [Openmp-dev] [4.0 Release] Schedule and call for testers

> On Dec 5, 2016, at 12:07 PM, Hans Wennborg via cfe-dev > wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 12:02 PM, Renato Golin > wrote: >> On 5 December 2016 at 19:56, Hans Wennborg wrote: >>> I'd like

Re: [lldb-dev] lldb-3.8.1 prebuilt binary for windows7

I am having no luck building LLDB with ninja, and there doesn't seem to be a "package" target in the generated msbuild solution file, but here's something interesting I found in cmake

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [Openmp-dev] [4.0 Release] Schedule and call for testers

On Mon, 5 Dec 2016 12:07:25 -0800 Hans Wennborg via lldb-dev wrote: > On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 12:02 PM, Renato Golin wrote: > > On 5 December 2016 at 19:56, Hans Wennborg wrote: > >> I'd like to avoid 4.1 because of the

Re: [lldb-dev] lldb-3.8.1 prebuilt binary for windows7

I'm OOO this week, but I can look into that when I get back. What issues are you having with building LLDB with Ninja? On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 4:04 PM Vadim Chugunov wrote: > I am having no luck building LLDB with ninja, and there doesn't seem to be > a "package" target in

Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] [Release-testers] [Openmp-dev] [4.0 Release] Schedule and call for testers

> -Original Message- > From: cfe-dev [mailto:cfe-dev-boun...@lists.llvm.org] On Behalf Of Michal > Górny via cfe-dev > Sent: Monday, December 05, 2016 3:33 PM > To: Hans Wennborg via lldb-dev > Cc: llvm-dev; Release-testers; openmp-dev (openmp-...@lists.llvm.org); > cfe-dev > Subject:

Re: [lldb-dev] Conditionally adding sources to the build

Hi, I am not aware of anyone ever trying that. In theory it should work if you copy the build and source folders to the other machine and run dotest.py with the right arguments there, but I guess that is not what you meant by "easy". The thing that I would try in this situation is to set it up so

[lldb-dev] [Bug 31267] New: Can't reference variable named 'template'

https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=31267 Bug ID: 31267 Summary: Can't reference variable named 'template' Product: lldb Version: unspecified Hardware: Macintosh OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal