On Oct 10, 2007, at 4:46 PM, Chris Lattner wrote:
On Oct 10, 2007, at 12:41 PM, Dan Gohman wrote:
1. if the name is short, print it as you propose.
2. if the name is long, print it with a number and optionally with a
subset of the name (last 10 chars?)
This could be implemented by just
The attached patch changes the names of internal labels used by
codegen. In place of the function number, which is a number that
codegen itself assigns specifically for this purpose, it uses the
(mangled) name of the function, which is already sufficiently unique.
For example, what currently
Dan,
I saw this in another compiler and liked it. Does anyone here
dislike it?
Patch looks pretty neat for me.
--
With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov.
Faculty of Mathematics Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University.
___
llvm-commits
My only concern is it won't look as pleasant if the function name is
long.
Evan
On Oct 10, 2007, at 7:36 AM, Dan Gohman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The attached patch changes the names of internal labels used by
codegen. In place of the function number, which is a number that
codegen itself
On Oct 10, 2007, at 9:33 AM, Evan Cheng wrote:
My only concern is it won't look as pleasant if the function name is
long.
Which happens with C++ mangled names all the time :(
a potentially solution to this (which may be over complex :) is to
have two options:
1. if the name is short,
My only concern is it won't look as pleasant if the function name is
long.
Which happens with C++ mangled names all the time :(
a potentially solution to this (which may be over complex :) is to
have two options:
1. if the name is short, print it as you propose.
2. if the name is
On Oct 10, 2007, at 12:41 PM, Dan Gohman wrote:
1. if the name is short, print it as you propose.
2. if the name is long, print it with a number and optionally with a
subset of the name (last 10 chars?)
This could be implemented by just adding a new ivar like
CurrentFunctionName that holds
