Re: [LMMS-devel] make some noise

2014-05-23 Thread Stian Jørgensrud
Hi oeai-2! I was one of the artists who provided a song for the album. I was also one of those who - kind of - made the contest and album come true, but the real credit must go to Avelocity (Uros and other artists). I am so rude that I toss my idea behind the album out: Promote the software LMMS a

Re: [LMMS-devel] Wiki revival

2014-05-23 Thread Tres Finocchiaro
It is quite ironic how easy it is to modify many lines of GPL source code yet how difficult it is to document that very same code into a wiki format. :) -- "Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For F

Re: [LMMS-devel] Wiki revival

2014-05-23 Thread Stian Jørgensrud
Oh fuck. You were sadly right. Attribution must be given, and we can't even licence these new pages different either if we use the old ones as references. What a licence hell we trapped ourself into just for the writing part. I guess I must provide a link to the history page of the old pages. Luk

Re: [LMMS-devel] Wiki revival

2014-05-23 Thread musikbear
arhh copyrighties... do *we* really have to go -there-, in respect to the community-help? /A simple disclaimer in the sign-up-to-wiki.. wouldent that do the trick?/ I cant see any problems for one public lmms wiki using pages from another public lmms wiki -Its not like someone copies pages from

Re: [LMMS-devel] Wiki revival

2014-05-23 Thread Lukas W.
Yes, that's the point. It's quite the same as on Wikipedia. You're not allowed to copy text from Wikipedia without attribution either. Most of Wikipedia's text is licensed under CC-BY-SA. 2014-05-22 16:44 GMT+02:00 Stian Jørgensrud : > Uhm, I thought this wiki worked in the same way as wikipedia?