[LMMS-devel] LMMS debugging instructions

So, I am trying to track the cause of the bug that DanWin describes on his PR[0]. Tres showed me a page on the wiki on how to compile LMMS with debugging symbols [1], but it still compiles with the O2 setting. When I try to print some value with GDB it prints "optimized out" probably because of t

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS 2.0 progress so far

diiz wrote > On 01/03/2015 01:14 AM, Stian Jørgensrud wrote: >> Were Pattern (Editor) also in use in other DAWs? > > Step sequencer is what it's usually called. "Pattern editor" I think is > mostly a FL studio thing. OK, I vote for Sequencer and Pattern Editor. -- View this message in context:

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS 2.0 progress so far

On 01/03/2015 01:14 AM, Stian Jørgensrud wrote: > Were Pattern (Editor) also in use in other DAWs? Step sequencer is what it's usually called. "Pattern editor" I think is mostly a FL studio thing. -- Dive into the World o

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS 2.0 progress so far

Well, since Sequencer is in use in other software it couldn't be that bad... Tres Finocchiaro wrote > Perhaps it's > not as important as I am making it though. :\ > > - > Tres.Finocchiaro@ Far more important is the clips/segments/patterns/Track containers. Better have one name everyone is u

Re: [LMMS-devel] Repo clean-up?

Thanks for the explanation. Uros PM'd me that he would cleanup the potentially offending CC0 content on Samples, so that's enough votes and initiative IMO to keep it. In regards to LSP2, I'll wait for Lukas to chime in. :) --

Re: [LMMS-devel] Repo clean-up?

Tres Finocchiaro wrote >> The sample repo is not inactive > > It has had 0 commits in 2 months... perhaps our definitions of "active" > differ... > > And this is different from my proposal how exactly? LMMS has been inactive at least six months without being deleted. I don't see why you would ju

Re: [LMMS-devel] Repo clean-up?

> > You didn't explain where the backup would go. If you take them away from > github > those projects would be harder to access, and most likely forgotten about. How does this help our discussion? Yes they'll be harder to access. Back it up now if you are worried. Forgotten about? Which rep

Re: [LMMS-devel] Repo clean-up?

You didn't explain where the backup would go. If you take them away from github those projects would be harder to access, and most likely forgotten about. The sample repo is not inactive, but we probably needs to start fresh, delete all the current samples. -- View this message in context: htt

lmms-devel@lists.sourceforge.net

My answer for you was going to be about the abundance of sites you already points on. If there was a site gathering them all, let's say, like this http://search.creativecommons.org/ it wouldn't be such a mess and hard to find the songs you want. -- View this message in context: http://linux-mul

[LMMS-devel] Repo clean-up?

Our GitHub repos "LMMS/Samples" and "LMMS/lsp2" are two GitHub repos we don't really work on. Can we backup the content somewhere and delete them (or hide them)? - *LMMS/Samples: *Lead mostly by "HDD" but he's A.W.O.L. (not responding to emails) and he was asked to clear up some licensing i

Re: [LMMS-devel] Mac version uses SDL.

On 01/02/2015 05:39 PM, Tres Finocchiaro wrote: > We do use CoreAudio on Mac. Yeah, but not directly... Again, if someone wants to code a direct CoreAudio backend, I see no reason to not include it. -- Dive into the Worl

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS 2.0 progress so far

Well, we were as close as we're ever going to get on "Sequence Editor", so we could milestone that, right? Toby liked Paul's recommendations here . You're right, this is a sensitive subject that's hard to agree on, but I feel that 2.0

Re: [LMMS-devel] mmp's xml syntax

> > We use Qt's xml parsing tools and formatting is decided by Qt. Feel free to > dive in to Qt docs to find out if there's any possibility to modify the > formatting. Otherwise nothing can be done. Perhaps, but XML parsers across languages tend to be almost identical to eachother. I've done thi

Re: [LMMS-devel] Mac version uses SDL.

[image: Inline image 1] - tres.finocchi...@gmail.com On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 10:39 AM, Tres Finocchiaro < tres.finocchi...@gmail.com> wrote: > We do use CoreAudio on Mac. > > -Tres > > -- Dive into the World of Parallel P

Re: [LMMS-devel] Mac version uses SDL.

We do use CoreAudio on Mac. -Tres -- Dive into the World of Parallel Programming! The Go Parallel Website, sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all things parallel software d

Re: [LMMS-devel] mmp's xml syntax

A simple google should give you qt documentation for whatever you need, and digging around github should show what version we use. iirc there was some talk of upgrading to some version but we decided to still use qt4? Feel free to correct me anyone who knows. ---

Re: [LMMS-devel] mmp's xml syntax

diiz wrote > We use Qt's xml parsing tools and formatting is decided by Qt. /That/ was useful, Thanks. Downstream i will see if i can find something there Are there different Qt versions? A link to the /right versions/ docs, would be apreciated -- View this message in context: http://linux

Re: [LMMS-devel] Mac version uses SDL.

Is there another platform that already has the back end implemented that i can see as an example? On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 1:58 PM, Vesa wrote: > On 01/02/2015 11:49 AM, Jonathan Aquilina wrote: > > I am curious how come for the mac version we arent using mac own core > > audio. I compiled stable

Re: [LMMS-devel] Mac version uses SDL.

On 01/02/2015 11:49 AM, Jonathan Aquilina wrote: > I am curious how come for the mac version we arent using mac own core > audio. I compiled stable 1.1 with source from the github repository > and everythign worked beautifully. On first load it prompted me which > audio back end to use be it jack p

Re: [LMMS-devel] mmp's xml syntax

We use Qt's xml parsing tools and formatting is decided by Qt. Feel free to dive in to Qt docs to find out if there's any possibility to modify the formatting. Otherwise nothing can be done. -- Dive into the World of Paral

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS 2.0 progress so far

On 12/31/2014 08:54 PM, Tres Finocchiaro wrote: > @Vesa, > > Should we consider either of these as part of 2.0? Eh, I don't know. Name changes are hard, we never reached any kind of consensus on any of the name change issues... personally, I'd be fine with renaming Song Editor -> Sequencer, but ca

Re: [LMMS-devel] mmp's xml syntax

Quoting musikbear : > you misunderstand. mmp is formally 'well formatted', it is /leagal/ to use > selfclosing tags, it is however making file opp. difficult, because there is > no reconiceable end-tag, and begin-tags can be difficult to reconize. This sounds like you're reading the XML through so

[LMMS-devel] Mac version uses SDL.

I am curious how come for the mac version we arent using mac own core audio. I compiled stable 1.1 with source from the github repository and everythign worked beautifully. On first load it prompted me which audio back end to use be it jack pulse or SDL and sdl was the chosen by default which worke