Re: [LMMS-devel] MinGW-X PPA update

@Toby, There may be a problem with this latest mingw-x build on precise per #1757 . I'll continue looking through changes since 1.1.0, but I suspect mingw is the culprit as the only change I can find to the codebase directly or indirectly touching VSTs wa

Re: [LMMS-devel] Sound Processing References/Course

On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 03:57:38PM +, Dave French wrote: > harry haaren also has some good blog posts worth a read. > > http://harryhaaren.blogspot.co.uk/2013/12/blog-status-moved-not-dead.html > http://openavproductions.com/ > > have a dig around on his 2 sites. There is stuff on RT audio a

Re: [LMMS-devel] Survey results

> > * Almost everyone got a 64 bit computer! No they don't. This is why we have to be careful with what we infer from survey results... Win32 download stats: - Approx *30,000* downloads since 12/23 Win64 download stats: - Approx *42,000* downloads since 12/23 OSX download stats (64-bi

Re: [LMMS-devel] Survey results

On 15-02-10 01:04 PM, Tres Finocchiaro wrote: I think the download numbers are lying more than the survey, How exactly? Do you think there is a 32-bit troll that keeps clicking on it for fun? What do you mean by this statement? the next time I should probably ask about 64/32 bit L

Re: [LMMS-devel] Survey results

Tres Finocchiaro wrote >> >> I think the download numbers are lying more than the survey, > > > How exactly? Do you think there is a 32-bit troll that keeps clicking on > it for fun? What do you mean by this statement? Sorry, realized that I should explained more after sending the mail. That t

Re: [LMMS-devel] Survey results

> > I think the download numbers are lying more than the survey, How exactly? Do you think there is a 32-bit troll that keeps clicking on it for fun? What do you mean by this statement? > the next time I should probably ask about 64/32 bit LMMS too. > I think that is the only valid informat

Re: [LMMS-devel] Survey results

Tres Finocchiaro wrote >> >> * Almost everyone got a 64 bit computer! > > > No they don't. This is why we have to be careful with what we infer from > survey results... > > Win32 download stats: > >- Approx *30,000* downloads since 12/23 > > Win64 download stats: > >- Approx *42,000*

Re: [LMMS-devel] Survey results

does 64bit lmms run 32bit vst's? On 10 February 2015 at 15:39, Tres Finocchiaro wrote: > Hmm... I just realized how misleading that question is... > > 64 bit computer > > > Users could have an AMD64 cpu running Windows XP and they wouldn't be > lying. > > Users could have a Core 2 Duo running Ub

Re: [LMMS-devel] Sound Processing References/Course

harry haaren also has some good blog posts worth a read. http://harryhaaren.blogspot.co.uk/2013/12/blog-status-moved-not-dead.html http://openavproductions.com/ have a dig around on his 2 sites. There is stuff on RT audio and mixers that is probably relevant to LMMS On 10 February 2015 at 14:01

Re: [LMMS-devel] Survey results

> > does 64bit lmms run 32bit vst's? Yes and this is true on both Linux (via Wine) as well as Windows (via 32-bit VST bridge) via: Win64/CMakeLists.txt#L4 and VstPlugin.cpp#L107

Re: [LMMS-devel] Survey results

Hmm... I just realized how misleading that question is... 64 bit computer Users could have an AMD64 cpu running Windows XP and they wouldn't be lying. Users could have a Core 2 Duo running Ubuntu 14.04 x86 and they wouldn't be lying. Users could have a first generation AMD64 cpu running Window

Re: [LMMS-devel] Sound Processing References/Course

On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 08:53:42AM -0500, Tres Finocchiaro wrote: > There is a disclaimer at the top about the revision 2 vs. 3 of the > liblv2-gui.  > Is that of concern? Yes, it does not work anymore, :-). This is the updated version: http://lv2plug.in/book/ The examples are really cool, a re

Re: [LMMS-devel] Sound Processing References/Course

That article is really good! In case that link every changes, here's a PDF backup of the article (8MB) https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B4PpvIwHd1U0RTc1Y0NwZkM4Nzg/view?usp=sharing There is a disclaimer at the top about the revision 2 vs. 3 of the liblv2-gui. Is that of concern? -Tres - tres.

Re: [LMMS-devel] Survey results

> > I see that I forgot to post a link to the survey to the mailing list. I > thought > I posted a reply to the original issue, oh well... sorry. Yeah, it didn't appear on my Facebook wall, so I missed out on it too. @Stian food for thought... we may also consider boosting the survey financiall

Re: [LMMS-devel] Survey results

Diego Rodrigues wrote > I didn't even knew there was a survey. > Is it still on or am I too late? > > > Best, > > Diego Rodrigues It has ended, we had 1 respondent answering yesterday until I ended it around nine o'clock. Total respondents are 120. I see that I forgot to post a link to the sur