Re: [LMMS-devel] 1.0.3 release...

Thank you kindly. Here are the counts. (I had a hard time getting curl to work with SF so I used tuxfamily instead). http://lmms.tuxfamily.org/counts.php source here: https://gist.github.com/tresf/df203d1952014aef930c Thinking forward (and off-topic to 1.0.3 thread) the nice thing about this

Re: [LMMS-devel] 1.0.3 release...

Thanks Tres. The download count on GitHub is only accessible using their API. https://help.github.com/articles/getting-the-download-count-for-your-releases https://developer.github.com/v3/repos/releases/ https://api.github.com/repos/LMMS/lmms/releases 2014-07-23 16:01 GMT+02:00 Tres Finocchiaro

Re: [LMMS-devel] 1.0.3 release...

@Lukas, Thanks. That worked. I see you've made the necessary changes already, thank you. I pasted in the release notes in from GitHub as well. Another question: Where is the download count on GitHub? @Stian, can we put something on Facebook about this release? - tres.finocchi...@gmail.com

Re: [LMMS-devel] 1.0.3 release...

The directory is not visible/listed on FTP, but you can still switch to it manually (blindly). 2014-07-23 15:21 GMT+02:00 Tres Finocchiaro : > Thanks, that got me to a directory listing but still no visibility of an > /home/project-web/lmms > > Are you sure the permissions were granted? Even the

Re: [LMMS-devel] 1.0.3 release...

Thanks, that got me to a directory listing but still no visibility of an /home/project-web/lmms Are you sure the permissions were granted? Even the SF portal doesn't give access to edit anything. - tres.finocchi...@gmail.com On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 6:03 AM, Lukas W. wrote: > It's written some

Re: [LMMS-devel] 1.0.3 release...

It's written somewhere in the (incredibly messy) docs of SourceForge. If i recall correctly, you should be able to connect to sftp:// web.sourceforge.net/ with your normal username and password. LMMS's htdocs should be in /home/project-web/lmms/htdocs or similar. 2014-07-22 16:56 GMT+02:00 Tres F

Re: [LMMS-devel] 1.0.3 release...

On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 10:05 AM, Lukas W. wrote: > You now should have access. > Is there a dedicated panel I need to use? I signed in and the page looks the same. Also tried SSH,SCP to (mostly) no avail. -- Want fast

Re: [LMMS-devel] 1.0.3 release...

You now should have access. 2014-07-22 14:33 GMT+02:00 Tres Finocchiaro : > Thanks Lukas. The Release notes on the front page as well as the Downloads > page should probably be > updated as well. > > I'd be happy to do this if you figure out how to gra

Re: [LMMS-devel] 1.0.3 release...

Thanks Lukas. The Release notes on the front page as well as the Downloads page should probably be updated as well. I'd be happy to do this if you figure out how to grant access. -Tres - tres.finocchi...@gmail.com On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 6:50 AM, Ves

Re: [LMMS-devel] 1.0.3 release...

On 07/22/2014 01:47 PM, Lukas W. wrote: > As I wrote elsewhere, I was away from home the past 5 days. I updated > the homepage and will try to give Tres access. > I did not upload the files to SourceForge yet, I'd try to avoid that. > Is there a way to link to the GitHub files instead or should I j

Re: [LMMS-devel] 1.0.3 release...

As I wrote elsewhere, I was away from home the past 5 days. I updated the homepage and will try to give Tres access. I did not upload the files to SourceForge yet, I'd try to avoid that. Is there a way to link to the GitHub files instead or should I just upload it on SF as well? - Lukas 2014-07-

Re: [LMMS-devel] 1.0.3 release...

On 07/21/2014 03:23 PM, Tres Finocchiaro wrote: > Should we scratch the 1.0.3 release in lieu of 1.1.0? This has been > 19 days now without help posting to our sf page. No, the release is already released... the binaries are already available via git. It's already public. Just that our homepage,

Re: [LMMS-devel] 1.0.3 release...

Should we scratch the 1.0.3 release in lieu of 1.1.0? This has been 19 days now without help posting to our sf page. - tres.finocchi...@gmail.com On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 3:08 PM, Tres Finocchiaro < tres.finocchi...@gmail.com> wrote: > If someone (eagles051387, lukas-w, pgib, tobydox) would be

Re: [LMMS-devel] 1.0.3 release...

If someone (eagles051387, lukas-w, pgib, tobydox) would be willing to give "tresf" access to SF, I would be happy to update the downloads area as well as the home page. :) *LMMS 1.0.3 Release Notes* ** *Fixed SF2 velocity/panning bug* *Updated Itialian translation* *Updated German translation* *Ad

Re: [LMMS-devel] 1.0.3 release...

Nitpicking but the 0710 name suffix was to differentiate from the other botched 1.0.3 versions and should probably be removed. :) -- Want fast and easy access to all the code in your enterprise? Index and search up to 200,

Re: [LMMS-devel] 1.0.3 release...

On 07/15/2014 03:41 AM, Tres Finocchiaro wrote: > > @Vesa: > > https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B4PpvIwHd1U0elJWaE81NF9Vam8/edit?usp=docslist_api > > https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B4PpvIwHd1U0MFoteHNqa0Vkbm8/edit?usp=docslist_api > Thanks, uploading now. -

Re: [LMMS-devel] 1.0.3 release...

@Vesa: https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B4PpvIwHd1U0elJWaE81NF9Vam8/edit?usp=docslist_api https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B4PpvIwHd1U0MFoteHNqa0Vkbm8/edit?usp=docslist_api -- Want fast and easy access to all the code in yo

Re: [LMMS-devel] 1.0.3 release...

On 07/15/2014 03:33 AM, Tres Finocchiaro wrote: > > @vesa, you could also upload the win32 release on there if you feel so > inclined. :) > Sure, can you link them for me again? The homepage & SF still need to be updated, as well. -

Re: [LMMS-devel] 1.0.3 release...

@vesa, you could also upload the win32 release on there if you feel so inclined. :) -- Want fast and easy access to all the code in your enterprise? Index and search up to 200,000 lines of code with a free copy of Black Duc

Re: [LMMS-devel] 1.0.3 release...

On 07/14/2014 09:29 PM, Lukas W. wrote: > There is not even a 1.0.3 release in the > source: https://github.com/LMMS/lmms/releases > This should be done first. Oh, I didn't know we track releases on github. It's done now. ---

Re: [LMMS-devel] 1.0.3 release...

There is not even a 1.0.3 release in the source: https://github.com/LMMS/lmms/releases This should be done first. 2014-07-12 2:30 GMT+02:00 Vesa : > Jonathan, Lukas or anyone else who has access to the SF site. Can you > upload the 1.0.3 windows-installers on SF, as well as a tarball of the > c

Re: [LMMS-devel] 1.0.3 release...

Jonathan, Lukas or anyone else who has access to the SF site. Can you upload the 1.0.3 windows-installers on SF, as well as a tarball of the current stable-1.0 branch (and name it 1.0.3). These are the latest windows builds of 1.0.3 built by Tres: * **1.0.3 Win32: *https://drive.goog

Re: [LMMS-devel] 1.0.3 release...

Here are the latest RC builds: 32-bit: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B4PpvIwHd1U0U3piYW5lUTNwWXM/edit?usp=sharing 64-bit: (suffers #962 ) https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B4PpvIwHd1U0QUctM2lhYTFINTQ/edit?usp=sharing If someone would like to upload them

Re: [LMMS-devel] 1.0.3 release...

On 07/09/2014 10:16 PM, Tres Finocchiaro wrote: > > On that note, we should also start working on the first RC release... > > > It seems the most recent builds (from both stable-1.0 and stable-1.1 > branches) have a VST issue which affects at least 32-bit VSTs on > 64-bit hosts. I'm not certai

Re: [LMMS-devel] 1.0.3 release...

> > On that note, we should also start working on the first RC release... > It seems the most recent builds (from both stable-1.0 and stable-1.1 branches) have a VST issue which affects at least 32-bit VSTs on 64-bit hosts. I'm not certain but this may be one of the possible regressions Toby warn

Re: [LMMS-devel] 1.0.3 release...

On 07/09/2014 07:03 PM, Tres Finocchiaro wrote: > > As far as the rest, I believe they are usability improvements that are > part of the future roadmap that we're aiming for so having such a > large amount of bug reports specifically named "1.0.3" makes it look > like we have more bugs open for thi

Re: [LMMS-devel] 1.0.3 release...

> > #947 not in 1.0.2 > And not reproducible by others. Please close and reopen once you are able to reproduce. > #945 also in 1.0.2 > #944 not in 1.0.2 > You stated yourself that you cannot reproduce this. Please close and reopen once you are able to reproduce. > #943 also in 1.0.2 > #942 al

Re: [LMMS-devel] 1.0.3 release...

Tres Finocchiaro wrote > If you have time to do this I expect to get it done for all main-components, propl not individual instruments, but we will see for 1.0.2 with winxp 32bit -this was the results : #947 not in 1.0.2 #945 also in 1.0.2 #944 not in 1.0.2 #943 also in 1.0.2 #942 also in 1.0.2

Re: [LMMS-devel] 1.0.3 release...

> 'WITs' should be done before 1.1 (most for larger components are done) If you have time to do this, great. Otherwise it may not make it. - tres.finocchi...@gmail.com On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 9:51 AM, musikbear wrote: > oki i will dl newest official 02 and install that - but 'WITs' should be

Re: [LMMS-devel] 1.0.3 release...

oki i will dl newest official 02 and install that - but 'WITs' should be done before 1.1 (most for larger components are done) about 103 #929 https://github.com/LMMS/lmms/issues/929 should be fixed before release. It is even a crasher in some weird circumstances -- View this message in context

Re: [LMMS-devel] 1.0.3 release...

Thanks for testing. Can you verify whether or not these issues exist in 1.0.2? As far as the latest builds of 1.0.92 as well as 1.0.3, 32-bit VSTs on 64-bit Windows seem to be broken. I'm waiting to hear back from Toby to see if this is related to the recent mingw updates. ---

Re: [LMMS-devel] 1.0.3 release...

Not very important, but Mallet 1.0.3 seams to have issues General: all tooltip missing Select-wave Marimba..tubular bells : ok, but option 'Bowed' not selectable Uniform Bar -only 'bowed' -static signal -observe visualization! Tuned bar -only 'bowed' -very low vol. -static

Re: [LMMS-devel] 1.0.3 release...

Ok. Here is the latest win32 builds which use Toby's newly fixed build scripts/PPA items (replaces pthreads with winpthreads, new fftw dlls). *32-bit:* https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B4PpvIwHd1U0NjVhdldzUUJmTU0/edit?usp=sharing *64-bit:* https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B4PpvIwHd1U0akwxSWhSZnZ

Re: [LMMS-devel] 1.0.3 release...

On 07/07/2014 06:50 PM, Tres Finocchiaro wrote: > Do we postpone this release until the SF2 bug is reported as fixed or > go ahead and release? Let's just release it now. If the current SF2 fix doesn't work (I don't see why it wouldn't though, unless there's something wrong with the build, just ma

Re: [LMMS-devel] 1.0.3 release...

I would go ahead and release we could always then release a 1.0.4 version. On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 5:50 PM, Tres Finocchiaro wrote: > Do we postpone this release until the SF2 bug is reported as fixed or go > ahead and release? > > -Tres > > > > --

Re: [LMMS-devel] 1.0.3 release...

Do we postpone this release until the SF2 bug is reported as fixed or go ahead and release? -Tres -- Open source business process management suite built on Java and Eclipse Turn processes into business applications with Bo

Re: [LMMS-devel] 1.0.3 release...

> > The weirdnes-file.. Does it do that for you too? > No, per the bug report, I was unable to reproduce. What absolute must /not/ happend, is that some of these are fixed, and then > apear again in 1.1 - This could be said about any 1.0.x patch. Vesa and Toby are pretty good about bringing p

Re: [LMMS-devel] 1.0.3 release...

Tres Finocchiaro wrote > Almost all of these are long standing issues. Which ones do you think > need > to be "killed" before release? The only ones i think is annoying and could confure user is ctrl+LMB does not change pencil to fast-select (as in Piano-roll) and Using sh+LMB as MID-mouse for th

Re: [LMMS-devel] 1.0.3 release...

Almost all of these are long standing issues. Which ones do you think need to be "killed" before release? Furthermore, most of these are general usability improvements and consistancy recommendations with the Piano Roll and Song Editor which could probably be lumped into a single enhancement requ

Re: [LMMS-devel] 1.0.3 release...

added 8 new issues to gitHub, for 103 on xp - most are /very minor,/ glitches - a few annying or odd. Those odds should be killed, before release. I have been through 'most' -not all yet, -specifically not all instruments, but they come next I have a complete test-scheme for everything- want it?

Re: [LMMS-devel] 1.0.3 release...

Tres Finocchiaro wrote > Please continue to test and report any anomalies. I'm mostly concerned > with Win32 because we need to vet out these strange bugs now so that the > win32 builds by the community are just as reliable as those we are use to. Ok, i will then work on a 'mockup project' with 1

Re: [LMMS-devel] 1.0.3 release...

So ZASFX is as good as it is going to get and SF2 is not fixed. Got it. I believe Vesa committed that patch so perhaps we should reopen the bug report and discuss there. Please continue to test and report any anomalies. I'm mostly concerned with Win32 because we need to vet out these strange bu

Re: [LMMS-devel] 1.0.3 release...

uhoh think i understand that bullet out thing - you mean from this list -right? Fixed SF2 velocity/panning bug Updated translations (Italian, German) Added lib64 to LADSPA search paths (Linux) (There is some Apple compat stuff but I don't think that's worth mentioning yet) I have *

Re: [LMMS-devel] 1.0.3 release...

Tres Finocchiaro wrote > Did you uninstall the old version first?... > ...Can you clarify you are working from a clean > slate and bullet out the fixes you have tested? Yes i have uninstalled everything before install of 1.0.3, and there is only 'old' installation-items in the folders (eg no monst

Re: [LMMS-devel] 1.0.3 release...

And yes, 1.0.3 = old FX mixer, old Zyn version. -- Open source business process management suite built on Java and Eclipse Turn processes into business applications with Bonita BPM Community Edition Quickly connect people,

Re: [LMMS-devel] 1.0.3 release...

Did you uninstall the old version first? Strange things can happen (i.e Monstro and Watsyn showing up) if you don't. This is something we should seriously consider addressing from the NSIS installer (check for other versions, force user to uninstall) because overwriting one installation with anot

Re: [LMMS-devel] 1.0.3 release...

and just to compare This http://snag.gy/DMGMV.jpg is SF2 panning of general-user using the diel in song-editor - Here its perfect, in contast to piano-roll-stick-bars :/ *c**p* -- View this message in context: http://linux-multimedia-studio-lmms.996328.n3.nabble.com/1-0-3-release-tp9457p9471.ht

Re: [LMMS-devel] 1.0.3 release...

winXP 32 1.3 is suposed to have old FX-mixer -Right? The zasfx bug #892 is ok here, but that would be expected, because it is not the updated zasfx #704 persists (also expected, as this is same version as with #704) What exactly does we need to know else from XP tests? Currently im working on wit

Re: [LMMS-devel] 1.0.3 release...

Sorry for the multiple emails, here's the fixed version: *Win32:* https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B4PpvIwHd1U0R25Ta1o3aDUxeGs/edit?usp=sharing *Win64:* https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B4PpvIwHd1U0dFljeTVlUG5kSUE/edit?usp=sharing @Vesa, as far as the changelog, these are the only changes I ca

Re: [LMMS-devel] 1.0.3 release...

Before testing these, it appears these have the Zyn GUI hard crash problem that surfaced in my 1.0.9x installers. I can patch CMakeFiles.txt to circumvent it like we did in the stable-1.1 branch but I'm concerned why this doesn't happen for Toby's installers. Toby, any idea? -Tres - tres.finocc

Re: [LMMS-devel] 1.0.3 release...

Here are the installers. Testers, please uninstall the old version prior to installing the new version. This may suffer regression of #892 for XP users which is planned to be corrected in 1.1. I haven't tested these myself so please let me know right awa

Re: [LMMS-devel] 1.0.3 release...

Also, Tres: the 1.0 branch has been bumped up to 1.0.3, it's ready for the windows builds. I can whip up some kind of changelog later. -- Open source business process management suite built on Java and Eclipse Turn process

Re: [LMMS-devel] 1.0.3 release...

On 07/03/2014 12:55 AM, Tobias Doerffel wrote: > Hi, > > 2014-07-02 20:34 GMT+02:00 Vesa : >> The version numbers have to be updated in the branch, after which we'd >> need windows builds done... and source tarballs, do we still host those? > Yes, that's what we used to do. I did this by running cm

Re: [LMMS-devel] 1.0.3 release...

Hi, 2014-07-02 20:34 GMT+02:00 Vesa : > The version numbers have to be updated in the branch, after which we'd > need windows builds done... and source tarballs, do we still host those? Yes, that's what we used to do. I did this by running cmake in-tree on a fresh git clone and run "make dist" af

Re: [LMMS-devel] 1.0.3 release...

> and source tarballs, do we still host those? Yes, historically Toby seems to provide a tarball copy for each official release, probably for snapshot purposes as the tarballs seem to still be favored for many distribution types. If Toby's not available for some reason I can provide the win32 ins

[LMMS-devel] 1.0.3 release...

I think it's time to do a 1.0.3 release, particularly since there's a whole page of stuff in 1.0 branch after 1.0.2, which includes a backported SF2 fix. The version numbers have to be updated in the branch, after which we'd need windows builds done... and source tarballs, do we still host those?