Hi,
Suppose I have pkt1 and pk2 which are instances of odp_packet_t.
Now I have two questions -
1. what is the way to chain the buffers of pkt1 and pkt2 into pkt1 so
that from now on I can just use pkt1 for transmission via, say, odp_pktio_send
API
2. if I create a new
Signed-off-by: Jerin Jacob jerin.ja...@caviumnetworks.com
---
helper/include/odph_ip.h | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/helper/include/odph_ip.h b/helper/include/odph_ip.h
index 272fd96..f2638ba 100644
--- a/helper/include/odph_ip.h
+++ b/helper/include/odph_ip.h
@@ -167,6
On 01/16/2015 03:58 PM, Maxim Uvarov wrote:
Correctly remove queue from packet i/o and remove it from scheduler.
Signed-off-by: Maxim Uvarov maxim.uva...@linaro.org
---
v8: fixed Stuart comments and added test. Implementation of
odp_pktio_inq_remdef
also fixes segfault in existance
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 06:13:42AM -0600, Bill Fischofer wrote:
Two questions:
1. We previously said we didn't need SCTP support for ODP v1.0, so why
is this needed?
Then there is a disconnect, exiting API has reference to SCTP
/**
* Check for SCTP
*
* @param pkt Packet handle
*
Bah, almost...
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 02:14:50PM +0100, Anders Roxell wrote:
Signed-off-by: Anders Roxell anders.rox...@linaro.org
debian/libodp0-dev.dirs| 2 ++
debian/libodp0-dev.install | 4
debian/libodp0.dirs| 1 +
debian/libodp0.install | 1 +
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 06:09:34AM -0600, Bill Fischofer wrote:
I think Petri should weigh in on these questions. For the first one, what
problems do you anticipate some platforms having with that equation?
I have two issues around the unit test case,
1) packet_len =
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 10:00 AM, Jerin Jacob
jerin.ja...@caviumnetworks.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 09:26:08AM -0600, Bill Fischofer wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 7:22 AM, Jerin Jacob
jerin.ja...@caviumnetworks.com
wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 06:09:34AM -0600, Bill
For next 0.9.0 release I created tempory branch with current patches.
Main reason is that events show go to repo first, then all other things.
Branch is here:
https://git.linaro.org/people/maxim.uvarov/odp.git/shortlog/refs/heads/odp_0.9.0
Maxim.
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 09:26:08AM -0600, Bill Fischofer wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 7:22 AM, Jerin Jacob jerin.ja...@caviumnetworks.com
wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 06:09:34AM -0600, Bill Fischofer wrote:
I think Petri should weigh in on these questions. For the first one,
what
On 01/19/2015 02:44 PM, Jerin Jacob wrote:
Signed-off-by: Jerin Jacob jerin.ja...@caviumnetworks.com
---
helper/include/odph_ip.h | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/helper/include/odph_ip.h b/helper/include/odph_ip.h
index 272fd96..f2638ba 100644
---
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 7:22 AM, Jerin Jacob jerin.ja...@caviumnetworks.com
wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 06:09:34AM -0600, Bill Fischofer wrote:
I think Petri should weigh in on these questions. For the first one,
what
problems do you anticipate some platforms having with that equation?
Are you suggesting that the issue here that some platforms may not be able
to allow applications precise control over the number of buffers in a
pool? For example, they might have a minimum number of buffers or a
minimum buffer count granularity? Do we need additional ODP_CONFIG values
to
I think Petri should weigh in on these questions. For the first one, what
problems do you anticipate some platforms having with that equation?
I think the cleanest solution would be to have the platform segment size
for a given pool accessible as pool metadata, e.g.,
odp_pool_seg_size(pool), but
On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 09:45:12AM -0600, Bill Fischofer wrote:
Application-visible sizes refer to application-visible data. Metadata is
always implementation-specific and not included in such counts. Metadata
is off books data that is associated with the packet but is not part of
any
On 17 January 2015 at 16:28, Bill Fischofer bill.fischo...@linaro.org wrote:
In the new model no buffers are queueable. Only events are queueable.
But you can convert a buffer handle to the corresponding event handle
and enqueue the event. Thus buffers must have the metadata that allows
them to
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 11:26:04AM +0100, Ola Liljedahl wrote:
On 17 January 2015 at 16:28, Bill Fischofer bill.fischo...@linaro.org wrote:
In the new model no buffers are queueable. Only events are queueable.
But you can convert a buffer handle to the corresponding event handle
and enqueue
From: Yan Sonming yan.songm...@linaro.org
Free all resource of odp which include share memory, queue and buffer pool.
Fix the bug of odp_shm_free.
Signed-off-by: Yan Songming yan.songm...@linaro.org
---
platform/linux-generic/include/odp_internal.h | 10 +++
Added odp_errno.c and odp_errno.h
Changed odp_packet_io and odp_timer to use it.
Signed-off-by: Mario Torrecillas Rodriguez mario.torrecillasrodrig...@arm.com
---
(This code contribution is provided under the terms of agreement LES-LTM-21309)
Changes from previous version:
* Moved __odp_errno
No, I was considering the abstraction for the fixed size buffer pool only.
The new type can used to allocate a buffer pool from hardware fixed size
buffer manager
without any metadata for queueable. something like,
pool = odp_buffer_pool_create();
odp_buffer_t x = odp_buffer_alloc(pool);
On 17 January 2015 at 23:22, Taras Kondratiuk
taras.kondrat...@linaro.org wrote:
On 01/17/2015 01:29 PM, Jerin Jacob wrote:
odp_packet_seg_t is an opaque type, based on the implementation, the return
value of odp_packet_last_seg can be changed after headroom/tailroom push/pull
operation.
No.
Two questions:
1. We previously said we didn't need SCTP support for ODP v1.0, so why
is this needed?
2. This is a helper, so it's not necessarily constrained by what may be
covered by ODP v1.0, but in that case why limit this to SCTP? There are
lots of other IP protocols that
On 1/19/15, 10:44 AM, Zoltan Kiss zoltan.k...@linaro.org wrote:
Hi,
I've found this in the README:
A new feature for pktgen and DPDK is to run multiple instances of
pktgen. This
allows the developer to share ports on the same machine.
But nothing more about running it in multiple instances.
Hi,
I've found this in the README:
A new feature for pktgen and DPDK is to run multiple instances of
pktgen. This
allows the developer to share ports on the same machine.
But nothing more about running it in multiple instances.
I've tried to run the latest version with 1.8 DPDK, but it
There appear to be a lot of whitespace changes, I assume they are
checkpatch cleanups in a number of cases.
Can we move all the non functional whitespace changes to their own patch so
that the logic of the change is more apparent in a single patch.
On 19 January 2015 at 06:34, Yan Songming
Ping!
Maxim.
On 12/29/2014 05:58 PM, Maxim Uvarov wrote:
v4: check issues after v3 discusstions: (spell, remote uint32_t, remove
Octeon code).
Maxim Uvarov (2):
linux-generic: remove octeon specific code from
odp_atomic_fetch_inc_u32
configure.ac check for atomic operations
25 matches
Mail list logo
