On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 10:47 PM Honnappa Nagarahalli <
honnappa.nagaraha...@linaro.org> wrote:
> On 28 March 2017 at 22:27, Bill Fischofer
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 10:11 PM, Honnappa Nagarahalli
> > wrote:
> >>
>
On 28 March 2017 at 22:27, Bill Fischofer wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 10:11 PM, Honnappa Nagarahalli
> wrote:
>>
>> On 27 March 2017 at 08:36, Ola Liljedahl wrote:
>> > On 27 March 2017 at 07:58,
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 10:28 PM, Honnappa Nagarahalli <
honnappa.nagaraha...@arm.com> wrote:
> I had run the checkpatch.pl, but I did not see these issues. May be it
> was to do with the way I generated the patch. I will address the ones that
> make sense.
>
I did a git am for your patches and
I had run the checkpatch.pl, but I did not see these issues. May be it was to
do with the way I generated the patch. I will address the ones that make sense.
Do we have to compile for 32b with gcc?
From: Bill Fischofer [mailto:bill.fischo...@linaro.org]
Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2017 10:01 PM
On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 10:11 PM, Honnappa Nagarahalli <
honnappa.nagaraha...@linaro.org> wrote:
> On 27 March 2017 at 08:36, Ola Liljedahl wrote:
> > On 27 March 2017 at 07:58, Honnappa Nagarahalli
> > wrote:
> >> My answers inline. I
On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 9:21 AM, Maxim Uvarov
wrote:
> Options becomes stable and not need any entry in main
> configure for platform specific pktio.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maxim Uvarov
>
Reviewed-by: Bill Fischofer
>
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 11:50 AM, Maxim Uvarov
wrote:
> bash -lt syntax expects 2 integer values, not strings.
> Also return code of piped command needs to be get in
> a little bit different way.
> https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2872
>
> Signed-off-by: Maxim
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 12:08 PM, Maxim Uvarov
wrote:
> Check unmap return code
> https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2831
>
> Signed-off-by: Maxim Uvarov
>
Reviewed-by: Bill Fischofer
> ---
>
First off, I'm not sure why you're seeing HTML since Gmail is set to plain
text mode for me.
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 9:18 PM, Brian Brooks wrote:
> On 03/28 18:50:32, Bill Fischofer wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> On Tue,
> Mar 28,
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 2:23 PM, Brian Brooks wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Brian Brooks
> ---
> include/odp/api/spec/queue.h | 5 +
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/odp/api/spec/queue.h b/include/odp/api/spec/queue.h
> index
On 28 March 2017 at 20:32, Bill Fischofer wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 11:18 AM, Honnappa Nagarahalli
> wrote:
>> On 28 March 2017 at 07:21, Bill Fischofer wrote:
>>> On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 7:19 AM,
Signed-off-by: Brian Brooks
---
include/odp/api/spec/queue.h | 5 +
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/odp/api/spec/queue.h b/include/odp/api/spec/queue.h
index 7972feac..1cec4773 100644
--- a/include/odp/api/spec/queue.h
+++
From: Ola Liljedahl
Signed-off-by: Ola Liljedahl
Reviewed-by: Brian Brooks
---
platform/linux-generic/pktio/ring.c | 30 ++
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
mode change 100644 =>
From: Ola Liljedahl
Signed-off-by: Ola Liljedahl
Reviewed-by: Brian Brooks
Reviewed-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli
---
helper/cuckootable.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 11:18 AM, Honnappa Nagarahalli
wrote:
> On 28 March 2017 at 07:21, Bill Fischofer wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 7:19 AM, Verma, Shally
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> -Original
On 28 March 2017 at 07:21, Bill Fischofer wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 7:19 AM, Verma, Shally
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: lng-odp [mailto:lng-odp-boun...@lists.linaro.org] On Behalf Of Bill
>> Fischofer
>> Sent:
ping
On 03/21/17 19:50, Maxim Uvarov wrote:
> bash -lt syntax expects 2 integer values, not strings.
> Also return code of piped command needs to be get in
> a little bit different way.
> https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2872
>
> Signed-off-by: Maxim Uvarov
> ---
ping
On 03/21/17 20:08, Maxim Uvarov wrote:
> Check unmap return code
> https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2831
>
> Signed-off-by: Maxim Uvarov
> ---
> platform/linux-generic/pktio/socket_mmap.c | 12 +---
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
On 27 February 2017 at 13:18, Matias Elo wrote:
> Previously packet_test_concatsplit() could fail on some pool
> implementations as the pool ran out of buffers. Increase default pools size
> and use capability to make sure the value is valid.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matias Elo
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 7:21 AM, Bogdan Pricope
wrote:
> There are two aspects to consider:
> 1. How to process odp_ipsec_in(), odp_ipsec_out(),etc. with explicit
> SA reference after an odp_ipsec_sa_disable() (or after
> odp_ipsec_sa_destroy())?
> 2. When is safe to
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 7:19 AM, Verma, Shally wrote:
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: lng-odp [mailto:lng-odp-boun...@lists.linaro.org] On Behalf Of Bill
> Fischofer
> Sent: 28 March 2017 16:44
> To: Ola Liljedahl
> Cc: nd
On 28/03/17 12:13, Bill Fischofer wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 4:10 AM, Ola Liljedahl
> wrote:
>> On 28 March 2017 at 10:41, Joe Savage wrote:
>>> Hey,
>>>
>>> I just wanted to clarify something about the expected behaviour of
>>> odp_queue_enq.
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 6:39 AM, Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo)
wrote:
> It's a mandatory feature when forwarding: "Forwarded packets need to maintain
> original, end-to-end checksum value.". A box in the middle must not
> re-compute e.g. L4 checksum.
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 4:58 AM, Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo)
wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Bill Fischofer [mailto:bill.fischo...@linaro.org]
>> Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2017 4:32 AM
>> To: Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo)
It's a mandatory feature when forwarding: "Forwarded packets need to maintain
original, end-to-end checksum value.". A box in the middle must not re-compute
e.g. L4 checksum. If it would do that, it could introduce an error in payload
data and update the checksum accordingly. The receiving end
These look good, but shouldn't these be documented as advisory? When
dealing with well-formed packets, it should not matter if HW always
recomputes checksums on transmit. The only time you'd need to suppress
checksum generation would be in diagnostic packet generators that are
intentionally
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 4:10 AM, Ola Liljedahl wrote:
> On 28 March 2017 at 10:41, Joe Savage wrote:
>> Hey,
>>
>> I just wanted to clarify something about the expected behaviour of
>> odp_queue_enq. In the following code snippet, is it acceptable
Checksum insertion has pktio interface level configuration
options. Per packet override is needed for example when
L4 checksumming is enabled and application forwards packets.
Forwarded packets need to maintain original, end-to-end checksum
value.
Signed-off-by: Petri Savolainen
Signed-off-by: Bogdan Pricope
---
example/generator/odp_generator.c | 136 +++---
1 file changed, 84 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)
diff --git a/example/generator/odp_generator.c
b/example/generator/odp_generator.c
index
Signed-off-by: Bogdan Pricope
---
example/generator/odp_generator.c | 23 +--
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/example/generator/odp_generator.c
b/example/generator/odp_generator.c
index 452fa8b..9305aa9 100644
---
Signed-off-by: Bogdan Pricope
---
example/generator/odp_generator.c | 28 ++--
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/example/generator/odp_generator.c
b/example/generator/odp_generator.c
index a9b07e5..452fa8b 100644
Signed-off-by: Bogdan Pricope
---
example/generator/odp_generator.c | 130 +-
1 file changed, 113 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/example/generator/odp_generator.c
b/example/generator/odp_generator.c
index
Signed-off-by: Bogdan Pricope
---
example/generator/odp_generator.c | 74 ---
1 file changed, 53 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/example/generator/odp_generator.c
b/example/generator/odp_generator.c
index
Improve performance of "odp_generator" example application.
Bogdan Pricope (5):
test: generator: compose sending packets from reference packet plus
differences
test: generator: send UDP packets in bursts
test: generator: receive packets in bursts
test: generator: use multiple RX queue
> -Original Message-
> From: Bill Fischofer [mailto:bill.fischo...@linaro.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2017 4:32 AM
> To: Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo) labs.com>
> Cc: lng-odp-forward
> Subject: Re: [lng-odp] [API-NEXT
On 28 March 2017 at 10:41, Joe Savage wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I just wanted to clarify something about the expected behaviour of
> odp_queue_enq. In the following code snippet, is it acceptable for the assert
> to fire? (i.e. for a dequeue after a successful enqueue to fail, with
Hey,
I just wanted to clarify something about the expected behaviour of
odp_queue_enq. In the following code snippet, is it acceptable for the assert
to fire? (i.e. for a dequeue after a successful enqueue to fail, with only a
single thread of execution)
odp_queue_t queue;
Ping.
> On 27 Feb 2017, at 14:18, Matias Elo wrote:
>
> Previously packet_test_concatsplit() could fail on some pool
> implementations as the pool ran out of buffers. Increase default pools size
> and use capability to make sure the value is valid.
>
> Signed-off-by:
Ping.
> On 17 Mar 2017, at 14:16, Matias Elo wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: Matias Elo
> ---
> platform/linux-generic/Makefile.am | 1 +
> platform/linux-generic/include/odp_thread_internal.h | 20
>
Ping.
> On 22 Mar 2017, at 17:29, Matias Elo wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: Matias Elo
> ---
> example/generator/odp_generator.c | 4 ++--
> example/ipsec/odp_ipsec_stream.c | 6 +++---
> helper/include/odp/helper/ip.h
41 matches
Mail list logo