On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 06:49:35PM +0300, Maxim Uvarov wrote:
On 01/19/2015 02:44 PM, Jerin Jacob wrote:
Signed-off-by: Jerin Jacob jerin.ja...@caviumnetworks.com
---
helper/include/odph_ip.h | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/helper/include/odph_ip.h
I'd agree if it's to be added it should be to the odp helper file.
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 9:00 AM, Mike Holmes mike.hol...@linaro.org wrote:
On 20 January 2015 at 09:52, Jerin Jacob jerin.ja...@caviumnetworks.com
wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 06:49:35PM +0300, Maxim Uvarov wrote:
On
Signed-off-by: Jerin Jacob jerin.ja...@caviumnetworks.com
---
helper/include/odph_ip.h | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/helper/include/odph_ip.h b/helper/include/odph_ip.h
index 272fd96..f2638ba 100644
--- a/helper/include/odph_ip.h
+++ b/helper/include/odph_ip.h
@@ -167,6
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 06:13:42AM -0600, Bill Fischofer wrote:
Two questions:
1. We previously said we didn't need SCTP support for ODP v1.0, so why
is this needed?
Then there is a disconnect, exiting API has reference to SCTP
/**
* Check for SCTP
*
* @param pkt Packet handle
*
On 01/19/2015 02:44 PM, Jerin Jacob wrote:
Signed-off-by: Jerin Jacob jerin.ja...@caviumnetworks.com
---
helper/include/odph_ip.h | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/helper/include/odph_ip.h b/helper/include/odph_ip.h
index 272fd96..f2638ba 100644
---
Two questions:
1. We previously said we didn't need SCTP support for ODP v1.0, so why
is this needed?
2. This is a helper, so it's not necessarily constrained by what may be
covered by ODP v1.0, but in that case why limit this to SCTP? There are
lots of other IP protocols that
