My apologies-- this time with Logging General CCed correctly...
> I would like to propose we move the log4cxx component to the attic.
> ...
>
> I have hoped that there were a couple of people coming back to the
> project when they see somebody is committing their patches. But it
> hasn't happened.
> I would like to propose we move the log4cxx component to the attic.
> ...
>
> I have hoped that there were a couple of people coming back to the
> project when they see somebody is committing their patches. But it
> hasn't happened...
JIRA contains unresolved issues with patches multiple years o
Hi.
We are also using log4cxx in one of our products and we are currently migrating
this product from a 32-bit to a 64-bit platform.
I am very excited to see what impact that will have on log4cxx.
If our tests fail we can always try to run those applications in 32-bit mode.
We are using version 0
We are using this library, a lot.
This is kind of a well stable product, and seems small amount of
changes,enhancements.
So it seems inactive, but NOT.
Some custom appenders been developed, but not in code base.
i feel, we *cant *consider this as dead. :(
regards,
*Chand Priyankara* [image: Fa
We use log4xx extensively ...
There are few changes I wanted to push, but I had no time ...
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 7:43 AM, Andrew Lazarus wrote:
> It's doing everything I want! So I haven't had any need to develop further.
>
> On Feb 06, 2013, at 09:31 PM, Christian Grobmeier
> wrote:
>
> Hel
We use log4xx extensively ...
There are few changes I wanted to push, but I had no time ...
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 7:43 AM, Andrew Lazarus wrote:
> It's doing everything I want! So I haven't had any need to develop further.
>
> On Feb 06, 2013, at 09:31 PM, Christian Grobmeier
> wrote:
>
> Hel