Chris, thanks for the submission. I have not had a chance to review, but I
hope to soon. Anyone else have comments?
-Mark
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 5:11 PM
> To: Log4J Developers List
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED
: Niclas Hedhman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thu 10/3/2002 9:16 PM
> To: Log4J Developers List
> Cc:
> Subject: Re: Proposed architecture changes to log4j for improved memory
> usage
>
>
> On Friday 04 October 2002 06:58, Bauman, Ni
needed it.
-Original Message-
From: Niclas Hedhman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thu 10/3/2002 9:16 PM
To: Log4J Developers List
Cc:
Subject: Re: Proposed architecture changes to log4j for improved memory usage
May I add to the "Date thread", that in my own "ancient proprietary" logging
system (back in 97, I think), one of the best speed improvements were a small
detail that is easy to forget.
Reviewing the log, it is important to know the time rather well, and that the
order of the events are corre
On Friday 04 October 2002 06:58, Bauman, Nick wrote:
> Chris, your input is very helpful.
>
> You say that per day, you're logging ~1 GB. What is that, something like,
> 1.15 MB per second? Isn't that too much?
You just failed your 3rd grade math exam ;o)
1,000,000,000 per day / 24 hours =
k.com> cc:
Subject: RE: Proposed architecture
changes to log4j for improved memory usage
el and get more
information.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thu 10/3/2002 2:35 PM
To: Log4J Developers List
Cc:
Subject: RE: Proposed architecture changes to log4j for improved memory usage
I'm glad to see the feed
I'm glad to see the feedback and interest on the message I posted. I will
try to start responding to specific questions early next week.
For memory and object count I used JProbe 4.0.
I very much appreciate the functionality of Log4J. I am sold on the API.
Any changes I am proposing I believe
Hi,
First of all - this was the most thought provoking message I'd seen on a
dev list for a long time, so thank you ;)
>Your results are somewhat surprising. I knew memory usage could be
>improved but hadn't realized the extent...
Same here. But to preface, I value speed and reliability far far
Hi Chris,
Object reuse and optimizing memory usage was one of the themes I was
seriously considering for future log4j releases.
Your results are somewhat surprising. I knew memory usage could be
improved but hadn't realized the extent...
More comments below.
At 10:42 03.10.2002 -0500, [EMAIL P
10 matches
Mail list logo
