At 16:12 20.01.2003 +0100, Alexander Erk wrote:
First I've tried to refactor the Category into Logger, which worked fine,
but then I saw that I also have to change it from
public Logger getInstance (String name)
also to
public Logger getLogger(String name)
and in order to keep up backwards c
Ceki Gülcü wrote:
At 15:37 20.01.2003 +0100, Alexander Erk wrote:
Hello dear log4j developers,
I've modified the log4jME source in a form that it is in the line with
the log4j stuff.
This means an application can do:
static Logger myLogger = Logger.getLogger("foo.bar.FooBar");
BTW: I've mod
At 15:37 20.01.2003 +0100, Alexander Erk wrote:
Hello dear log4j developers,
I've modified the log4jME source in a form that it is in the line with the
log4j stuff.
This means an application can do:
static Logger myLogger = Logger.getLogger("foo.bar.FooBar");
BTW: I've modified the Hierarchy
Hello dear log4j developers,
I've modified the log4jME source in a form that it is in the line with
the log4j stuff.
This means an application can do:
static Logger myLogger = Logger.getLogger("foo.bar.FooBar");
...
...
...
myLogger.info("initXlet log4j");
...
...
...
BTW: I've modified the
Hi Alexander,
I had myself already taken a look at log4jME to notice the same thing.
Personaly, I wouldn't use any deprecated class in my new projects so I
decided to use log4j and then siwtch to log4jME when an up-to-date version
is available (they are said to be compatible).
Lately anyway, I ha
Hi logj4 people,
I am planing to use the log4jME in one of my projects. First I've looked
for a small version of log4j and the workplan for log4j 1.2 showed me,
that there is log4jME available.
When I look into the code, I see that log4jME is still using the
Category class. But logj4 itself mov
