RE: Proposed architecture changes to log4j for improved memory usage

2003-01-23 Thread mwomack
Chris, thanks for the submission. I have not had a chance to review, but I hope to soon. Anyone else have comments? -Mark > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 5:11 PM > To: Log4J Developers List > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16229] - Convenience methods to cut object allocations in application code

2003-01-23 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16229] - Convenience methods to cut object allocations in application code

2003-01-23 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16360] New: - Lack of properties on LoggingEvent

2003-01-23 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: cvs commit: jakarta-log4j/src/java/org/apache/log4j/servlet InitServlet.java InitContextListener.java

2003-01-23 Thread Jacob Kjome
Hi Mark, Looks like you committed the correct code and added the change that I suggested, so all looks good! The only problem with the names might be that we might want to have multiple initializer servlets and servlet context listeners. Not sure if that is in the plans, but if it is, then n

RE: InitServlet.java InitContextListener.java

2003-01-23 Thread Mark Womack
Hey Jake, > Looks like you committed the correct code and added the change that I > suggested, so all looks good! Yeah! > The only problem with the > names might be > that we might want to have multiple initializer servlets and servlet > context listeners. Not sure if that is in the plans,