cvs commit: jakarta-log4j/src/java/org/apache/log4j/chainsaw/prefs default.properties

2003-12-12 Thread sdeboy
sdeboy 2003/12/12 01:05:03 Modified:src/java/org/apache/log4j/chainsaw ChainsawToolBarAndMenus.java ApplicationPreferenceModelPanel.java src/java/org/apache/log4j/chainsaw/prefs default.properties Log: * Updated responsi

RE: [PROPOSAL] Logging services top level project

2003-12-12 Thread Ceki Gülcü
At 01:03 PM 12/11/2003 -0800, Mark Womack wrote: Sorry for the delay and my general absence from the discussions. Things are still crazy here at work. +1 My comments on the subject: 1) If the "sister" projects decide to not particpate, then I think the need/momentum for this TLP dissipates. So,

cvs commit: jakarta-log4j/src/java/org/apache/log4j/chainsaw ChainsawToolBarAndMenus.java

2003-12-12 Thread psmith
psmith 2003/12/12 02:27:47 Modified:src/java/org/apache/log4j/chainsaw ChainsawToolBarAndMenus.java Log: Active tab menu is now disabled if there is no active tab selected Revision ChangesPath 1.24 +3 -53 jakarta-log4j/src/java/org/apach

cvs commit: jakarta-log4j/src/java/org/apache/log4j/chainsaw ModifiableListModel.java LoggerNameTreePanel.java

2003-12-12 Thread psmith
psmith 2003/12/12 02:28:21 Modified:src/java/org/apache/log4j/chainsaw LoggerNameTreePanel.java Added: src/java/org/apache/log4j/chainsaw ModifiableListModel.java Log: Moved some inner classes to Top level classes Revision ChangesPath 1.16 +64 -9 jakart

cvs commit: jakarta-log4j/src/java/org/apache/log4j/chainsaw CheckListCellRenderer.java

2003-12-12 Thread psmith
psmith 2003/12/12 02:30:52 Added: src/java/org/apache/log4j/chainsaw CheckListCellRenderer.java Log: (last commit msg included wrong file to match the comment) Log Tree panel now has a displayed ignore list with check boxes. You can DBL click an ent

cvs commit: jakarta-log4j/src/java/org/apache/log4j/chainsaw LogPanelPreferencePanel.java

2003-12-12 Thread psmith
psmith 2003/12/12 02:31:37 Modified:src/java/org/apache/log4j/chainsaw LogPanelPreferencePanel.java Log: inner class has been moved to top level. Revision ChangesPath 1.12 +0 -65 jakarta-log4j/src/java/org/apache/log4j/chainsaw/LogPanelP

cvs commit: jakarta-log4j/src/java/org/apache/log4j/chainsaw LogUI.java

2003-12-12 Thread psmith
psmith 2003/12/12 02:32:40 Modified:src/java/org/apache/log4j/chainsaw LogUI.java Log: New app pref frame was not receiving L&F change notification and so stayed in the Metal L&F. Revision ChangesPath 1.51 +1 -0 jakarta-log4j/src/java/org/apache/log4j/chainsa

Re: [PROPOSAL] Logging services top level project

2003-12-12 Thread Ceki Gülcü
At 08:00 AM 12/12/2003 +1100, Paul Smith wrote: Could I ask when would this proposal be submitted to the board? I'd like to submit it as soon as we have the OK of the log4j-dev committers. We also need to decide who the chairman for Logging Services PMC will be. Any volunteers? I would also dearly

Logging Services project at Apache

2003-12-12 Thread Ceki Gülcü
Hello, This message is to inform you that we, the log4j developers, are actively considering the creation of a top level Apache project offering a wide-range of cross-language Logging Services. You are invited to join the discussion at the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list. You can also follow the th

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25475] New: - ErrorHandler does not work for SocketAppender

2003-12-12 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Logging Services project at Apache

2003-12-12 Thread Jacob Kjome
At 12:34 PM 12/12/2003 +0100, you wrote: Please note that joining the Logging Services project would necessarily mean changing your existing license to the Apache Software License. I know licences like GPL and LGPL have been said to be "viral", but isn't Apache being a bit viral? The Apache point

RE: commons-logging (was [PROPOSAL] Logging services top levelproject)

2003-12-12 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Howdy, I'm not a big fan of commons-logging: I agree it's nice in theory but not at all in practice. However, its usage appears to be increasing rather than decreasing. The tomcat 5 branch is much more heavily dependent on commons-logging than the tomcat 4 branch ;( Yoav Shapira Millennium Chem

Re: Logging Services project at Apache

2003-12-12 Thread Ceki Gülcü
You raise interesting questions. The licensing wars are indeed getting tiresome. Nevertheless, qualifying the Apache license as viral is highly inaccurate. The ASF asks you to adopt the Apache Software License if you decide to live under its roof. That is the rule. The proposal was for the Logging

RE: ApacheCon

2003-12-12 Thread Wolf Siberski
It's great to hear that ApacheCon was such a success. Given that it's soon a month since it took place, IMHO it would be the right time now to publish the slides, and - maybe even more important - the source code for the logging domain proposal (or is it already in the CVS?). Ceki Gülcü wrote: >

Log4j Domains

2003-12-12 Thread Bruce Deen
I have a question about Log4J Domains, I noticed this is on the planning page for Log4J 1.3.  Will the Log4J Domain allow change to what is currently conceived as a Category?   My current issue is that I have a JRun 4 application server, on this server I have multiple web applications wit

RE: Log4j Domains

2003-12-12 Thread Scott Deboy
Title: Message I can't really answer your question on domains, but I have something that will help you not have to munge the loggers:  Chainsaw v2.   It makes examining information such as a userid in the MDC much simpler (for example, you can tell Chainsaw to send events for each unique mdc

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24159] - Log4J can create deadlock conditions

2003-12-12 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: jakarta-log4j/src/java/org/apache/log4j/chainsaw/icons ChainsawIcons.java

2003-12-12 Thread psmith
psmith 2003/12/12 13:40:36 Modified:src/java/org/apache/log4j/chainsaw/icons ChainsawIcons.java Log: added reference to a Focus On and an ignore icon Revision ChangesPath 1.8 +3 -0 jakarta-log4j/src/java/org/apache/log4j/chainsaw/icons/ChainsawIcons.java

cvs commit: jakarta-log4j/src/java/org/apache/log4j/chainsaw LoggerNameTreePanel.java

2003-12-12 Thread psmith
psmith 2003/12/12 13:44:58 Modified:src/java/org/apache/log4j/chainsaw LoggerNameTreePanel.java Log: beginnings of some work to improve usability of the focus on, ignore logger. within the Logger name tree panel. If you hold down CTRL the mouse icon changes to a Focus On icon

Re: Logging Services project at Apache

2003-12-12 Thread Jacob Kjome
At 03:49 PM 12/12/2003 +0100, you wrote: You raise interesting questions. The licensing wars are indeed getting tiresome. Nevertheless, qualifying the Apache license as viral is highly inaccurate. The ASF asks you to adopt the Apache Software License if you decide to live under its roof. That is t

cvs commit: jakarta-log4j/src/java/org/apache/log4j/chainsaw/rule AbstractRule.java

2003-12-12 Thread sdeboy
sdeboy 2003/12/12 18:57:23 Modified:src/java/org/apache/log4j/chainsaw LogUI.java LogPanel.java src/java/org/apache/log4j/chainsaw/color ColorPanel.java RuleColorizer.java src/java/org/apache/log4j/chainsaw/rule AbstractRule.java L

cvs commit: jakarta-log4j/src/java/org/apache/log4j/chainsaw/icons ChainsawIcons.java

2003-12-12 Thread psmith
psmith 2003/12/12 22:46:19 Modified:src/java/org/apache/log4j/chainsaw LoggerNameTreePanel.java src/java/org/apache/log4j/chainsaw/icons ChainsawIcons.java Log: "improved" the Logger name mouse-based ignoring. Not perfect, but getting better. Revision Changes