I would imagine most people extend from AbstractLayout or
AbstractStringLayout if they even make custom layouts.
On 4 April 2016 at 12:31, Gary Gregory wrote:
> And I imagine that _moving_ Layout is too much of a BC break even though
> it is in Core?
>
> Gary
>
> On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 10:40 AM,
And I imagine that _moving_ Layout is too much of a BC break even though it
is in Core?
Gary
On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 10:40 AM, Gary Gregory
wrote:
> IMO, the oddness is that Layout is NOT in the layout package. So I would
> leave all layout items in layout...
>
> Gary
>
> On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at
IMO, the oddness is that Layout is NOT in the layout package. So I would
leave all layout items in layout...
Gary
On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 8:00 AM, Remko Popma wrote:
> What package should the Encoder and ByteBufferDestination interfaces live
> in?
>
> Currently they are both in org.apache.loggin
What package should the Encoder and ByteBufferDestination interfaces live
in?
Currently they are both in org.apache.logging.log4j.core.layout, but
o.a.l.l.core.Layout extends Encoder and it seems a bit strange to have
Layout's super interface live in a subpackage.
I think there are pros and cons
