I plan on building the release with Java 7. I will give the site build a shot
with Java 8 and see how it comes out. I am hopeful I can do the 2.4 release
over the holiday weekend.
Ralph
> On Jun 30, 2015, at 8:51 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> Well, it's all at the RM's discretion but you could
Well, it's all at the RM's discretion but you could build the distro with
Java 7 and the site with 8.
Gary
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 8:16 AM, Remko Popma wrote:
> You mean we will use the maven.compile.* properties to compile with java7,
> and use some different mechanism (not sure what) to creat
You mean we will use the maven.compile.* properties to compile with java7,
and use some different mechanism (not sure what) to create the javadoc with
java8? That would work for me.
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 11:19 AM, Gary Gregory
wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 5:13 PM, Remko Popma
> wrote:
>
>
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 5:13 PM, Remko Popma wrote:
> Yes, we need to be careful: if we compile with java8 the class version
> will be such that a java 7 JRE will refuse to load our jar ("Incompatible
> class version").
>
No, it will not. We define the maven.compile.* properties to deal with tha
Yes, we need to be careful: if we compile with java8 the class version will be
such that a java 7 JRE will refuse to load our jar ("Incompatible class
version").
I also like the java8 Javadoc though.
Sent from my iPhone
> On 2015/06/30, at 8:38, Ralph Goers wrote:
>
> That would be the site
That would be the site build. I always build the artifacts with the idk we are
targeting just to be safe.
Ralph
> On Jun 29, 2015, at 4:24 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> Mostly to RG: Any thoughts on building with Java 8 to get the nicer looking
> Javadocs?
>
> Gary
>
> --
> E-Mail: garydgreg
