[jira] Created: (LOG4J2-25) TopicConnection is not closed

2008-08-13 Thread Hao Zhong (JIRA)
TopicConnection is not closed - Key: LOG4J2-25 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-25 Project: Log4j 2 Issue Type: Bug Reporter: Hao Zhong In the code snippet [1], public JMSSink( Stri

Re: log4j 1.2.16 release plan

2008-08-13 Thread Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen
Curt Arnold skrev den 13-08-2008 07:16: I've thinking it is likely that we may run into problems with the geronimo artifacts on earlier JVM's. May have to hack the pom.xml and rebuild to get compatible bytecode. The geronimo artifacts are only used for building, not running. Shouldn't that

Re: log4j 1.2.16 release plan

2008-08-13 Thread Paul Smith
On 13/08/2008, at 19:27, Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Curt Arnold skrev den 13-08-2008 07:16: I've thinking it is likely that we may run into problems with the geronimo artifacts on earlier JVM's. May have to hack the pom.xml and rebuild to get compatible byt

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40246] HierarchyDynamicMBean missing unregister MBean

2008-08-13 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40246 Paul Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|NEW -- Config

Re: log4j 1.2.16 release plan

2008-08-13 Thread Paul Smith
On 13/08/2008, at 3:16 PM, Curt Arnold wrote: I'd like to address the following bugs and then get an RC1 for log4j 1.2.16 out For consideration: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43282 (OSGI packaging info - seems trivial.. ?) https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43313] log4j 1.2.16 release considerations and discussion

2008-08-13 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43313 Hugues Pisapia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECT

Re: log4j 1.2.16 release plan

2008-08-13 Thread Curt Arnold
On Aug 13, 2008, at 4:27 AM, Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen wrote: Curt Arnold skrev den 13-08-2008 07:16: I've thinking it is likely that we may run into problems with the geronimo artifacts on earlier JVM's. May have to hack the pom.xml and rebuild to get compatible bytecode. The geronimo ar

[jira] Resolved: (LOG4J2-25) TopicConnection is not closed

2008-08-13 Thread Curt Arnold (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-25?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Curt Arnold resolved LOG4J2-25. --- Resolution: Invalid This JIRA is for log4j 2.0 development. To report a bug against log4j 1.2, pleas

svn commit: r685618 - /logging/log4j/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/log4j/spi/LocationInfo.java

2008-08-13 Thread carnold
Author: carnold Date: Wed Aug 13 10:40:34 2008 New Revision: 685618 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=685618&view=rev Log: Bug 45039: Rework to work from bottom down and explicitly format fullinfo Modified: logging/log4j/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/log4j/spi/LocationInfo.java Modified

svn commit: r685646 - in /logging/log4j/trunk: pom.xml src/changes/changes.xml

2008-08-13 Thread carnold
Author: carnold Date: Wed Aug 13 12:27:27 2008 New Revision: 685646 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=685646&view=rev Log: Bug 43282: Add OSGi packaging info Modified: logging/log4j/trunk/pom.xml logging/log4j/trunk/src/changes/changes.xml Modified: logging/log4j/trunk/pom.xml URL:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43282] Add OSGi packaging info to log4j and companions

2008-08-13 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43282 Curt Arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|ASSIGNED ---

svn commit: r685684 - in /logging/log4j/trunk: src/changes/ src/main/java/org/apache/log4j/ src/main/java/org/apache/log4j/helpers/ src/main/java/org/apache/log4j/net/ src/main/java/org/apache/log4j/s

2008-08-13 Thread carnold
Author: carnold Date: Wed Aug 13 14:35:05 2008 New Revision: 685684 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=685684&view=rev Log: Bug 44157: InterruptedIOException ignored by log4j Modified: logging/log4j/trunk/src/changes/changes.xml logging/log4j/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/log4j/Daily

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 44157] InterruptedIOException ignored by log4j

2008-08-13 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44157 Curt Arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

Re: log4j 1.2.16 release plan

2008-08-13 Thread Paul Smith
The recent release build environment is a JDK 1.4 javac targeting JDK 1.1 bytecode. If the Geronimo jars contain JDK 1.5 bytecode, they won't work with JDK 1.4 compilers. Not sure, but I suspect that might be the case. Compilers in later JDKs don't support generating JDK 1.1 bytecode

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 44157] InterruptedIOException ignored by log4j

2008-08-13 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44157 --- Comment #4 from Jared Oberhaus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-08-13 16:40:00 PST --- This is great, thank you! I took a look at the change, and here's what I observed: * java/org/apache/log4j/PropertyConfigurator.java * java/org/apache/

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 45629] New: TopicConnection is not closed

2008-08-13 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45629 Summary: TopicConnection is not closed Product: Log4j Version: unspecified Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows 2000 Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2

Re: log4j 1.2.16 release plan

2008-08-13 Thread Curt Arnold
On Aug 13, 2008, at 5:34 PM, Paul Smith wrote: The recent release build environment is a JDK 1.4 javac targeting JDK 1.1 bytecode. If the Geronimo jars contain JDK 1.5 bytecode, they won't work with JDK 1.4 compilers. Not sure, but I suspect that might be the case. Compilers in late