Re: [VOTE] Log4j 2.6.2 rc1

2016-07-07 Thread Gary Gregory
On Jul 7, 2016 3:29 AM, "Mikael Ståldal" wrote: > > Now I see that the latest (post 2.6.2) addition lacks type as well: > > > Update Jackson from 2.7.5 to 2.8.0. > My bad, I'll fix that today. Gary > > On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 8:03 AM, Ralph Goers

Re: [VOTE] Log4j 2.6.2 rc1

2016-07-07 Thread Ralph Goers
The web site is corrected. It had the 4 items but with an odd icon. I’ve updated changes.xml and RELEASE_NOTES.txt. While they won’t be in the release distribution RELEASE_NOTES.txt is used for the announcement email. Ralph > On Jul 6, 2016, at 8:23 AM, Ralph Goers

[jira] [Commented] (LOG4J2-1459) [PatternLayout] Add an ANSI option to %message

2016-07-07 Thread JIRA
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1459?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15365750#comment-15365750 ] Mikael Ståldal commented on LOG4J2-1459: If we define the syntax for this, why do we name it

Build failed in Jenkins: Log4j 2.x #2092

2016-07-07 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
See Changes: [rgoers] Fix changes.xml and update release notes -- Started by an SCM change [EnvInject] - Loading node environment variables. Building remotely on ubuntu3 (Ubuntu ubuntu

[jira] [Commented] (LOG4J2-1459) [PatternLayout] Add an ANSI option to %message

2016-07-07 Thread Gary Gregory (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1459?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15365759#comment-15365759 ] Gary Gregory commented on LOG4J2-1459: -- Since the output is ANSI, it seems to me that saying "ANSI"

[jira] [Commented] (LOG4J2-1459) [PatternLayout] Add an ANSI option to %message

2016-07-07 Thread JIRA
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1459?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15365851#comment-15365851 ] Mikael Ståldal commented on LOG4J2-1459: Isn't the ANSI part of the output just an implementation

Re: [VOTE] Log4j 2.6.2 rc1

2016-07-07 Thread Remko Popma
+1 Remko > On 2016/07/06, at 14:53, Ralph Goers wrote: > > This is a vote to release Log4j 2.6.2, the next version of the Log4j 2 > project. > > Please download, test, and cast your votes on the log4j developers list. > [] +1, release the artifacts > [] -1,

Re: [VOTE] Log4j 2.6.2 rc1

2016-07-07 Thread Mikael Ståldal
Now I see that the latest (post 2.6.2) addition lacks type as well: Update Jackson from 2.7.5 to 2.8.0. On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 8:03 AM, Ralph Goers wrote: > The web site is corrected. It had the 4 items but with an odd icon. I’ve > updated

Start configuration snippet for log4j2.properties?

2016-07-07 Thread Ole Ersoy
Hi, Hope it's OK that I ask about this here. If not just say USER LIST! http://stackoverflow.com/questions/38254220/start-configuration-snippet-for-log4j2-properties I think Stackoverflow, given it's QA guidelines and voting features, are a great way to speed up adoption and get Log4J2 in

Re: Start configuration snippet for log4j2.properties?

2016-07-07 Thread Ralph Goers
Remko and I try to answer questions on stackoverflow as quickly as possible. I just responded to yours. But to be honest, you probably could have gotten this from the manual online. All I really did was take the example from the manual and tailor it a little bit for use in a Maven build.

Re: Start configuration snippet for log4j2.properties?

2016-07-07 Thread Ole Ersoy
Great thanks - good to know. I usually just grab the source and look at tests, but I find it refreshing when the answer is readily available on SO. SO is becoming my cheat sheet :). Thanks again, Ole On 07/07/2016 10:22 PM, Ralph Goers wrote: Remko and I try to answer questions on

Re: Start configuration snippet for log4j2.properties?

2016-07-07 Thread Remko Popma
Agree with everything said here. Also, just wanted to point out that I wouldn't object if people want to upvote my answers. Don't mind that at all. :-) Remko Sent from my iPhone > On 2016/07/08, at 13:04, Ole Ersoy wrote: > > Great thanks - good to know. I usually

Re: Start configuration snippet for log4j2.properties?

2016-07-07 Thread Ole Ersoy
Incidentally YAML feels more modern and user friendly, but it seems like a lot of the current articles focus on the XML format. I think the YAML support is a big plus. There's a nice comparison of the two formats for log4j2 here: