[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-6?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12867818#action_12867818
]
Ralph Goers commented on LOG4J2-6:
--
In my experimental branch I provide the methods such as
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-7?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12867817#action_12867817
]
Ralph Goers commented on LOG4J2-7:
--
In my experimental branch I make heavy use of Java 5 con
Den 15/05/10 08.29, Ralph Goers (JIRA) skrev:
My experimental branch uses annotations for Logj components, but still does not
address my desire to allow applications to inject logging.
Annotations are just meta-information. You will need the classloader to
take special action on them for a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-9?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12867816#action_12867816
]
Ralph Goers commented on LOG4J2-9:
--
In my experimental branch the configuration is pluggable
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-14?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12867815#action_12867815
]
Ralph Goers commented on LOG4J2-14:
---
Isn't this done?
> log4j 2.0 development initation
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-17?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12867814#action_12867814
]
Ralph Goers commented on LOG4J2-17:
---
In my experimental branch I have enhanced Filters so
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-19?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12867813#action_12867813
]
Ralph Goers commented on LOG4J2-19:
---
In my experimental branch I used plugins to accomplis
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-20?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12867812#action_12867812
]
Ralph Goers commented on LOG4J2-20:
---
In my experimental branch the configuration is separa
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-21?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12867811#action_12867811
]
Ralph Goers commented on LOG4J2-21:
---
In my experimental branch the log message is an objec
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-23?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12867810#action_12867810
]
Ralph Goers commented on LOG4J2-23:
---
My experimental branch provides a default configurati
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-24?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12867809#action_12867809
]
Ralph Goers commented on LOG4J2-24:
---
If I understand the issue correctly, this can be addr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-30?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12867808#action_12867808
]
Ralph Goers commented on LOG4J2-30:
---
I have removed author tags for the classes in my expe
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-32?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12867806#action_12867806
]
Ralph Goers commented on LOG4J2-32:
---
My experimental branch provides the layout for RFC 54
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-31?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12867807#action_12867807
]
Ralph Goers commented on LOG4J2-31:
---
This is implemented on my experimental branch
> The
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-33?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12867805#action_12867805
]
Ralph Goers commented on LOG4J2-33:
---
My experimental branch uses annotations for Logj comp
I think I'm in the home stretch of the features I'd like to get in to this
Chainsaw release, so I have cycles to help get companions out the door if
needed.
Anything I can help with?
Scott
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 7:16 PM, Curt Arnold wrote:
> Need to back port some of the later fixes in the log
On May 14, 2010, at 8:41 PM, Ralph Goers wrote:
> See below.
>
> On May 14, 2010, at 7:07 AM, Curt Arnold wrote:
>
>> Could you review the "bugs" in the log4j2 JIRA and give a quick comments
>> about your submission and the bug.
>
> Sure. I'll try to do this asap but my time to work on Log4j
See below.
On May 14, 2010, at 7:07 AM, Curt Arnold wrote:
> Could you review the "bugs" in the log4j2 JIRA and give a quick comments
> about your submission and the bug.
Sure. I'll try to do this asap but my time to work on Log4j isn't very
consistent.
>
> If there are any significant desi
Could you review the "bugs" in the log4j2 JIRA and give a quick comments about
your submission and the bug.
If there are any significant design decisions or requirements that came out
from this work, could you file them as new bugs.
Did you use or consider the earlier pattern layout stuff I did
On May 14, 2010, at 2:01 AM, Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen wrote:
> Den 14/05/10 09.22, Ralph Goers skrev:
>> 2. I don't like the way Logback binds to the implementation. I used a
>> technique I had used in a previous logging framework and used a file to
>> define the implementation class. In theory,
Den 14/05/10 09.22, Ralph Goers skrev:
2. I don't like the way Logback binds to the implementation. I used a technique
I had used in a previous logging framework and used a file to define the
implementation class. In theory, the API could be modified to support multiple
logging implementation
Thanks for trying it out. I hadn't actually built from the root - I've built
the api and core separately - so I'm glad you were able to fix those problems.
I didn't want to commit code until I had the core of something that actually
functioned. I struggled for a couple of weeks over how to attac
22 matches
Mail list logo
