On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 8:39 PM, Ralph Goers
wrote:
> Does my answer to your other email make this question moot?
>
Kind of but not really :-) We can pause this thread and continue the more
meaty discussion in the other thread.
Thank you,
Gary
>
> Ralph
>
> On Sep
Does my answer to your other email make this question moot?
Ralph
> On Sep 16, 2016, at 11:55 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> Right now, we can say:
>
> @PluginFactory
> public static ConcurrentMap createAppenders(
>
See AbstractConfiguration.createPluginObject() along with createPluginMap().
On 16 September 2016 at 15:11, Matt Sicker wrote:
> There's some sort of support already for Map and Collection as a
> @PluginElement, though I've never actually used it.
>
> On 16 September 2016 at
There's some sort of support already for Map and Collection as a
@PluginElement, though I've never actually used it.
On 16 September 2016 at 13:55, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Right now, we can say:
>
> @PluginFactory
> public static ConcurrentMap
Right now, we can say:
@PluginFactory
public static ConcurrentMap createAppenders(
@PluginElement("Appenders") final Appender[] appenders) {
and you get an array of type Foo, which is really neat.
What it be out of bounds to think of doing: