From that description our approaches have indeed been complimentary. I saw
problems in the fundamental core of Log4j and SLF4J/Logback that are in the
API, configuration and filtering. I've always considered the Appender and
Layout concepts to be more or less OK, except how they were infringed
On May 31, 2010, at 7:41 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> I just digged a little bit around the code. Besides the projects
> mentioned below there is ralphs stuff. How is it planned to put it all
> together?
>
You think we have a plan?
Ralph and I are going in two different, but hopefully even
, 2010, at 5:41 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> I just digged a little bit around the code. Besides the projects
> mentioned below there is ralphs stuff. How is it planned to put it all
> together?
>
>
>
> On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 5:23 AM, Curt Arnold wrote:
>>
I just digged a little bit around the code. Besides the projects
mentioned below there is ralphs stuff. How is it planned to put it all
together?
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 5:23 AM, Curt Arnold wrote:
> Moved some stuff around in the log4j2 sandbox at
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/l
Moved some stuff around in the log4j2 sandbox at
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/logging/log4j/branches/BRANCH_2_0_EXPERIMENTAL.
I fixed the test failures in the 2007 and 2008 vintage code. The were test
utility problems that had previously affected log4j 1.2 but were not addressed
in this
