After extensive trial and error I think I have things boiled down. In my
list works means that I see logging. For some there may be caveats.
All tests were run using Weblogic 10.3.6 (a Servlet 2.5 container) running
on Java 7. There were no difference when using Log4j 2.0 versus 2.0.1.
When I
Are system libraries in Weblogic loaded as OSGi bundles?
On 6 August 2014 11:39, Mike Calmus m...@calmus.org wrote:
After extensive trial and error I think I have things boiled down. In my
list works means that I see logging. For some there may be caveats.
All tests were run using Weblogic
I am investigating migrating from log4j 1 to log4j 2. A pattern that I have in
many of my applications is setting the log level based on command line
arguments. So if the -v (verbose) option is passed I set the log level to
Info. The default is set to warn.
if (line.hasOption(v))
{
This is what I have tried:
?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?
Configuration
Appenders
Console name=Console target=SYSTEM_OUT
PatternLayout pattern=%-5p [%t]: %m%n/
/Console
/Appenders
Loggers
Logger name=debug level=debug
AppenderRef
Please see
http://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/manual/configuration.html#Additivity
Ralph
On Aug 6, 2014, at 10:42 AM, Arwen Pond ap...@book.com wrote:
I am investigating migrating from log4j 1 to log4j 2. A pattern that I have
in many of my applications is setting the log level based on
I should also add that your configuration didn’t show a root logger. There is
always a root logger so I suspect you are also logging to it. If you make all
your loggers be configured with additivity=“false” that should stop happening.
Ralph
On Aug 6, 2014, at 1:13 PM, Ralph Goers
Hi,
Is there any plan to merge this patch to the main branch? This
functionality seems extremely useful when modifying config file is not an
option.
Thanks,
Ang
On 6/25/14, 12:19 AM, Phil Wray phil.w...@db.com wrote:
Classification: For internal use only
Hey Ralph.
Sure - have created:
My application takes a parameter where the user can specify the log file. I'd
like to pass this parameter to the Logger which uses a FileAppender. I am not
sure how to do this in log4j 2.
Thanks,
Arwen
This electronic mail message contains information that (a) is or
may be CONFIDENTIAL,
I don't know for sure, but based upon my reading online it appears that may
be a new feature for 12c which we are not yet using.
On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 1:33 PM, Matt Sicker boa...@gmail.com wrote:
Are system libraries in Weblogic loaded as OSGi bundles?
On 6 August 2014 11:39, Mike Calmus
I wouldn’t have asked for a patch submission if I didn’t plan to consider it.
That said, we are all volunteers here and sometimes don’t get to things as
quickly as we would like.
Ralph
On Aug 6, 2014, at 1:24 PM, Ang Xu a...@linkedin.com.INVALID wrote:
Hi,
Is there any plan to merge this
I wonder if we could write a MainArgumentsLookup that finds the main
thread and walks up the stack to the public static main(String[]) main
methods and gets the arguments from the stack...
Gary
On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 6:54 PM, Ralph Goers ralph.go...@dslextreme.com
wrote:
Well….
You would
Wouldn’t it be easier to have a Lookup that your main called and just passed
the arguments? But yeah, it should be possible to do what you are suggesting.
Ralph
On Aug 6, 2014, at 4:09 PM, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote:
I wonder if we could write a MainArgumentsLookup that finds
Yes you are right but the stack walker could be used even if you do not control
to source for main. Maybe a script calls a main and then my app plugin gets
called and I want to also follow the verbose command line setting.
Gary
div Original message /divdivFrom: Ralph Goers
I don't follow... If you walk the stack trace you can find the name of the
original class whose main() method was called, but how would that give you
access to the main method's parameter values?
Sent from my iPhone
On 2014/08/07, at 9:26, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes you
With some debug API hackery:
http://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/jdk/api/jpda/jdi/com/sun/jdi/StackFrame.html
Gary
On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 8:36 PM, Remko Popma remko.po...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't follow... If you walk the stack trace you can find the name of the
original class whose main()
Oooh... A little naughty, but a lot of fun! :-)
Thanks for the pointer!
Sent from my iPhone
On 2014/08/07, at 9:44, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote:
With some debug API hackery:
http://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/jdk/api/jpda/jdi/com/sun/jdi/StackFrame.html
Gary
On Wed,
And worse: vendor specific!
Gary
On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 9:05 PM, Remko Popma remko.po...@gmail.com wrote:
Oooh... A little naughty, but a lot of fun! :-)
Thanks for the pointer!
Sent from my iPhone
On 2014/08/07, at 9:44, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote:
With some debug
Hey, it's better than having to use sun.util.Reflection!
On 6 August 2014 20:19, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote:
And worse: vendor specific!
Gary
On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 9:05 PM, Remko Popma remko.po...@gmail.com wrote:
Oooh... A little naughty, but a lot of fun! :-)
Thanks
I'm pretty sure the root logger has an implicit default configuration if
it's missing from your config file.
On 6 August 2014 15:57, Arwen Pond ap...@book.com wrote:
Do you have to specify a root logger in the configuration?
additivity=false solved my issue. Thanks.
-Original
Oh, well that wouldn't really help things at this point as I think there
are still some strange issues in the OSGi support in Log4j anyhow. I'll see
if I can take a look at this since we use the same version of Weblogic at
my work (thus I actually know a little bit about this application).
On 6
20 matches
Mail list logo
